RoadHazard
Gold Member
i really need to get to mario odyssey. is it really as good as the rating suggests?
It's worse than Super Mario 64, Super Mario Galaxy, Super Mario Galaxy 2, Super Mario 3D World. But yes, it's a really good game.
i really need to get to mario odyssey. is it really as good as the rating suggests?
It has the same score as Mario Odyssey. I think you mean it's tied for the highest rated game of all time on opencritic.
Checkmate Souls nerds.
It wont gain wide appeal because it's too hard.
People will say oh yes, but it's more accessible than previous games. Yes, but there are still absolute roadblock bosses throughout the game that will crush the hope of most casual players from ever going deeper.
Still, it earned every point of it's score. It's easily in my top 3 games of all time. I saw someone in another thread say it's an Ocarina of time benchmark game and honestly that is a very large boot to fill but I cant remember the last time I felt such a sense of complete and utter immersion as playing through this. I literally forgot to eat for an entire day. I think it's been 15 years since I did that with a game.
to each their own i supposeGoing to have to express EXTREME disagree with that...
it's a solid 80, but if you want an actual platforming masterpiece that deserves its rating consider Ratchet and Clank 1 (for the PS2, not the reboot) or if you just want more mario play 64 insteadi really need to get to mario odyssey. is it really as good as the rating suggests?
Can we officially say that Elden Ring is going to snuff the demand for a Bloodbourne remake?
Not for me, I really didnt enjoy Galaxy 1 and 2, I respect they are great games but not my prefered type of Mario Platforming.Galaxy is still the GOAT.
I know ratings are not everything , but they signal to me to buy a game when they are this high.
That’s gaming I guess; different strokes for different folks! I didn’t like Undertale at all but P5R is in my top 5 of all time.to each their own i suppose
Not for me, I really didnt enjoy Galaxy 1 and 2, I respect they are great games but not my prefered type of Mario Platforming.
But Ive learnt they are classed as different types of 3D Mario games.
Mario 64, Sunshine and Odyssey - Sandbox
Galaxy 1 and 2 - Linear
Mario 3D Land etc - Cant remember what they are called lol
I can express extreme AGREEMENT with this!it's a solid 80, but if you want an actual platforming masterpiece that deserves its rating consider Ratchet and Clank 1 (for the PS2, not the reboot) or if you just want more mario play 64 instead
They matter yesReviews matter now?
Depends on the game and scoreBecause gaming journalists reviews are really indicative of quality.
With ED and Hades in the top 10, maybe a new generation of gamers is inspired to apply themselves a little. casuals have diluted the culture enough.
I feel like From will let us enjoy ER for a few months , and drop a Bloodborne remake bomb out of no where.Can we officially say that Elden Ring is going to snuff the demand for a Bloodbourne remake?
Hey look he's here in another ER thread to shit on it!It has the same score as Mario Odyssey. I think you mean it's tied for the highest rated game of all time on opencritic.
Checkmate Souls nerds.
With ED and Hades in the top 10, maybe a new generation of gamers is inspired to apply themselves a little. casuals have diluted the culture enough.
Probably not in the long run though. Why not remake it?Can we officially say that Elden Ring is going to snuff the demand for a Bloodbourne remake?
I'm not saying they won't. I"m just thinking that this game will be much more popular over the long haul.Probably not in the long run though. Why not remake it?
That's Sony's decision to make.I feel like From will let us enjoy ER for a few months , and drop a Bloodborne remake bomb out of no where.
Edit: Or a sequel!
At least it holds its own. It'll likely do another 20 million. 2022 is exceptional alreadyHorizon keeps releasing alongside literal GOATS
Probably. I think a bit of its hype is centered around it being an exclusive.I'm not saying they won't. I"m just thinking that this game will be much more popular over the long haul.
This is hard to say man. On one hand, the success of Elden Ring means Sony would have to offer a buttload of money to From in order to make a new Bloodborne. Because if you could make money off your own franchise, why would you put effort on others?Can we officially say that Elden Ring is going to snuff the demand for a Bloodbourne remake?
Souls games haven't this high so we will see. but All others in the top 10 are multi-million sellers.do sales line up with critical praise?
Can we officially say that Elden Ring is going to snuff the demand for a Bloodbourne remake?
I am a primary PS5 owner but also own a swith. Odyssey deserves all that praise. The game is platform perfection.
This is from the tweet in the op, but yes for some inexplicable reason Odyssey is a 97. It's hilarious.
Edit - welp, Elden Ring is a 96 now.
You were nailing this until you ended with "until you are dead" instead of "until there is a remake."Temporarily, for how long who knows, but they'll start up soon enough.
They can't be reasoned with, they can't be bargained with. They don't feel pity or remorse or fear and they absolutely will not stop. Ever. Until you are dead.
You were nailing this until you ended with "until you are dead" instead of "until there is a remake."
Dang it Farley.
why would one great game eliminate demand for a remake of a similar yet different great gameCan we officially say that Elden Ring is going to snuff the demand for a Bloodbourne remake?
Doubt itIF I don't like Dark Souls and just think Bloodbourne is alright, will I like Elden Ring.
My opinion is when its a game in a genre I’ve enjoyed before, and a 9 is the low outlier, they matter quite a bit to me.Reviews matter now?