...but mobile gaming is the thing nowadays.
Apple can crash and burn. I don’t want them in the gaming hardware business.
Not if Apple price it anything else like the rest of their product line. Nintendo are expensive already but imagine an Apple version. It’ll be twice the price if not more.If this is true Nintendo has one hell of a fight on its hands
Very debatable. If they can bring something new to the industry that's an overall net positive and unique, then why not? Personally I think there's a space for a 4th but it would be someone focused on some type of tight integration between console gaming and arcade/FEC (and given the state of things, theater) gaming, giving a big boon to those markets while also benefiting gaming.We don't need any more players in the console business.
I'm grossed out by this.. I've had enough of them in this industry. They came in and bulldozed with almost no effort, and then we got "gacha" gaming. Which was derived from smart phone games. I don't want Apple and games together, unless they bring some REALLY amazing games themselves that I actually like.Apple can crash and burn. I don’t want them in the gaming hardware business.
That's the scary part. The hardware is so good in terms of mobile performance they could make something that could run amazing games in a small form factor. Imagine them becoming a power player in the games industry. They would try to lock up control in yet another area ...I've said it for a while now but they would be stupid not to get involved considering how good their chips are along with apple arcade.
I would argue we are getting to a point that a lot of games are already starting to blend those lines. I am not happy about it but it is happening.Videogame software that doesn't feel like it was designed for the phone (Possible but takes time).
That wouldn't be a big deal. They have exclusives now like Fantasian.I wouldn't assume Apple can't or won't be able to make a mass market price, they have been selling $300-349 iPad forever very successfuly......
The bigger issue for them would be exclusive software.
That wouldn't be a big deal. They have exclusives now like Fantasian.
... I don't think they'd WANT exclusives, at least to their gaming device. They'd want games you could play on your iOS devices too, which means it will be just another iOS device.
To actually make a device and ecosystem that would run Nintendo out of business would require Apple to do some very un-Apple things. I think they could do it through sheer force, but it would cost more than it would be worth to them.
What's Ray Tracking?
Apple uniting Sony, Nintendo and Microsoft fanboys
Nintendo and Apple have radically different philosophies, because in the end, they have radically different origins so I don't know if I can agree that Nintendo is the Apple of the gaming world. If anything, Sony being an innovative gadget company from the beginning makes them closer to Apple than Nintendo is. But even Sony produced music and movies, so Sony already had the DNA in their company to produce entertainment. (Not to mention Sony helped Nintendo create the SNES and we all know what happened to make Playstation happen.)I'm not sure I agree with that, Nintendo is the apple of the gaming world, and they made it work. It just takes the right combination of hardware, price and games to make it a success. The history of the gaming market proves this can be done, just look at how Sony and ms started out with nothing.
It wouldn't even cost them that much, with apple brand recognition and the right software partners.
Nah... a portable of +$750 will not be a competitor to NintendoIf this is true Nintendo has one hell of a fight on its hands.
The problem with MS was they, kept trying to anticipate what Apple would do and it wasn’t what they would do, Xbox one tv - Apple TVNintendo and Apple have radically different philosophies, because in the end, they have radically different origins so I don't know if I can agree that Nintendo is the Apple of the gaming world. If anything, Sony being an innovative gadget company from the beginning makes them closer to Apple than Nintendo is. But even Sony produced music and movies, so Sony already had the DNA in their company to produce entertainment. (Not to mention Sony helped Nintendo create the SNES and we all know what happened to make Playstation happen.)
Nintendo is, at the end of the day, a toy/games company. Apple is a tech company that pushes their ecosystem on high end expensive devices. Other than both having integrated hardware/software solutions, their philosophies are very different.
For Apple to run Nintendo out of the market, they would need to outprice them (which they can do since they create their own cpus and gpus), starve Nintendo of third party content, and create compelling first party content. These are things they could do but it would cost a LOT of money. Microsoft threw a lot of money at the problem and still hasn't solved it (though Apple is probably a lot smarter than Microsoft in consumer products, admittedly).
At which point it won't work against the Switch. Like I said, they could beat the Switch and run Nintendo out of business but they'd have to very un-Apple things. An Apple hybrid device would still run iOS and be integrated into their ecosystem, and not be a gaming-focused device.The problem with MS was they, kept trying to anticipate what Apple would do and it wasn’t what they would do, Xbox one tv - Apple TV
so they lost years in that absurd quest
I am almost sure Apple will copy Nintendo switch, lately we are seeing that trend, like what they did with the air tags.
Apple will not compete with price. it will be the usual “high end Apple experience” meaning it will be expensive.
No it doesn't. Look I love Apple devices, however they are premium devices in which you pay a premium because its Apple. Apple has no gaming background, no real first party studios, and they don't have a real footprint in the gaming market outside of Apple Arcade. Nintendo has arguably the greatest franchises in all of Gaming, and continue to pump out high quality polished games that the masses eat up.If this is true Nintendo has one hell of a fight on its hands.
If this is true Nintendo has one hell of a fight on its hands.
Yes and technically they already have an hybrid, all iOS apps and games can run on M1 chips, so does on the Apple TV and now Apple supports controllers…. AAA gaming on macs been neglected for a long time.At which point it won't work against the Switch. Like I said, they could beat the Switch and run Nintendo out of business but they'd have to very un-Apple things. An Apple hybrid device would still run iOS and be integrated into their ecosystem, and not be a gaming-focused device.