Lisa Su, why do you do this to us??
It does?
Keep in mind 3080s barely exist at all, let alone at MSRP. We'll have to see how it actually pans out over the next 6 months. And remember, you can't expect the same level of performance from Nvidia past a card's 2 years. etc etc
www.techspot.com
Keep in mind 3080s barely exist at all, let alone at MSRP. We'll have to see how it actually pans out over the next 6 months. And remember, you can't expect the same level of performance from Nvidia past a card's 2 years. etc etc
That's extreme though.
Ray Tracing & DLSS with the GeForce RTX 3080
With Nvidia's GeForce RTX 3080 out the door, it's time we take a deep dive into ray tracing and DLSS performance to show you just how fast...
You guys sound as if RDNA2 and
6GB more ram, lower power consumption, same arch as consoles for $50 less.
Lisa Su, why do you do this to us??
Since when is raytracing a dealbreaker for PC gaming? People wants to play 60fps in 4k at ultra settings
Let's wait here. You can't just take FPS numbers from other websites without knowing how AMD measured that result. Metro Exodus performs significantly worse in the in-game benchmark, so if AMD used the benchmark to gauge performance while the 3080 numbers are from a lighter region of the game, well... that would render that comparison completely pointless.
Lisa Su, why do you do this to us??
People are surprised that AMD first gen raytracing isnt as good? Since when.
AMDs first gen raytracing solution will be great but not as great at nvidia's second crack at it. It's what we expected...you cant expect AMD to jump ahead a generation and compete head to head in rasterization, whoop nvidia's ass in perf/watt, whoop them at lower resolutions, AND match them in RT in one generation. We saving the RT ass whooping for RDNA 3 next year babe
Never seen a fanboy as worse as him. Literally turns the blind eye to facts, and even when the whole entire thread he created, laughs at him in regards to DLSS comparison of Death Stranding, he still doubles down. Delusion is a serious thing.
They have more cards releasing next year?AMDs first gen raytracing solution will be great but not as great at nvidia's second crack at it. It's what we expected...you cant expect AMD to jump ahead a generation and compete head to head in rasterization, whoop nvidia's ass in perf/watt, whoop them at lower resolutions, AND match them in RT in one generation. We saving the RT ass whooping for RDNA 3 next year babe
I doubt AMD has much to be concerned about with DirectX 11 titles, since they should have a big fillrate and geometry advantage.
This is coming from someone that looked at a DLSS screenshot from literally the first implementation and formed an unshakable opinion that completely ignores the fact that current DLSS is fantastic, and in some cases, quite literally better than native resolution. But, if you want to continue to be ignorant on purpose to try and spread false info, you do you.
It's always funny to me that when it's nVidia, nobody cares about power consumption. But when it was the R9 290X, the R9 390X, the R9 Fury, the RX480, the RX580, the Vega 56/64, the Radeon VII and the 5700XT, suddenly power consumption becomes a primary concern. And yes, between them there are differences of lower than 20W compared to nVidia...
Tomorrow apparently. I also thought it was supposed to be today.
I read somewhere that the 5nm node would be available to amd sometime next year but It could've been bs idk.
Next year will be the 40CU equivalent. And maybe by the end of next year we get RDNA3, which allegedly will have another 50% bump in performance per watt and improved ray tracing.
Yeah but they're under NDA.
Brace yourself boys, it still isn't going to be enough stock, IMHO.
I remember telling people about my experiences with VRAM requirements in my own development side as well as testing on the games with my PC. I declared that 10G of VRAM was too little for this generation. Instead of hearing me out, I got backlash on "usage" doesn't mean "allocation" over and over again to justify some invisible number that a person THINKS the graphics engine is using.
Bottom Line - 16G or more of VRAM is required for good cohesive FPS and streamlined pipeline. It'd be nice if people actually listened and asked questions instead of strong arming my recommendations only to be proven wrong by some random website.
From what I heard embargo lifts exactly on release.
Same as every game or tech product these days. It is industry standard
The only thing 6800xt has is vram which is not needed yet and it's hard to say if it will be needed in less than 2 years
RAGE MODE!!!!!
Sheeit.
Yeah, like blur, or loss of detail.
Oh wait.
But sure John.
