• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

AMD Announced AMD Radeon PRO W7000 with up to 48GB of VRAM

Draugoth

Gold Member



AMD (NASDAQ: AMD) today announced the AMD Radeon™ PRO W7000 Series graphics, its most-powerful workstation graphics cards to date. The AMD Radeon™ PRO W7900 and AMD Radeon™ PRO W7800 graphics cards are built on groundbreaking AMD RDNA™ 3 architecture, delivering significantly higher performance than the previous generation and exceptional performance-per-dollar compared to the competitive offering. The new graphics cards are designed for professionals to create and work with high-polygon count models seamlessly, deliver incredible image fidelity and color accuracy, and run graphics and compute-based applications concurrently without disruption to workflows.

AMD Radeon PRO W7000 Series graphics cards feature the world’s first workstation GPU architecture based on AMD’s advanced chiplet design, providing real-world multi-tasking performance and incredible power efficiency. The new graphics cards are also the first professional workstation GPUs to offer the new AMD Radiance Display Engine™ featuring DisplayPort™ 2.1 that delivers a superior visual experience, higher resolutions and more available colors than ever before.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 graphics card, designed for extreme workloads, features 61 TFLOPS (FP32) peak single precision performance, offering 1.5X higher geomean performance on the SPECviewperf 2020 benchmark. It also includes 48GB of GDDR6 memory, which is 1.5X larger memory capacity than the 32GB available on the previous-generation graphics card. Created for heavy workloads, the AMD Radeon PRO W7800 graphics card features 45 TFLOPS (FP32) peak single precision performance and 32GB of GDDR6 memory.
 

AV

We ain't outta here in ten minutes, we won't need no rocket to fly through space
Who's gonna be the first person in this thread to call it a gaming card?
 

HeisenbergFX4

Gold Member
Who's gonna be the first person in this thread to call it a gaming card?
Kombucha No But GIF
 
This is like playing games on a Quadro. It's not for gamers.

Cool on AMD though. The more competition they give Nvidia the better.

PS5 finally dethroned?
PS5 is old news in terms of hardware specs. Slow SSD (5.5gb/s), limited Raytracing, 10.3TF gpu and 16GB RAM shared across cpu/gpu. all based on Zen 2 (so PCIE 4.0/DDR4)

PC has SSD with 7+ gb/s (with 12-15GB/s next year probably), can run Cyberpunk pathtracing at 70+fps, 30-80TF gpus, and support for PCIE5.0/DDR5. GPUs come with up to 24GB VRAM and of course you can have <128GB RAM.
 
Last edited:

ToTTenTranz

Banned
That Radeon Pro W7800 256bit 32GB.. is it a Navi 31 with two MCDs disabled or could this be the first appearance of Navi 32?

If it's the second, then the Radeon 7800XT should be close to release.


EDIT: The W7800's page says the chip's transistor count is the same 57.7B as the W7900 and the 7900XTX, so this should be a Navi 31 with only 4 MCDs from the 6 maximum, and a whopping 26CUs disabled.
If true, this does not bode well for the state of Navi 32. It could still be a typo, though.


Another disappointment here is how they didn't stack additional Infinity Cache chips on top of the MCDs. One would assume they'd put the additional cache for these highly expensive SKUs, but they didn't.
 
Last edited:

Imtjnotu

Member
This is like playing games on a Quadro. It's not for gamers.

Cool on AMD though. The more competition they give Nvidia the better.


PS5 is old news in terms of hardware specs. Slow SSD (5.5gb/s), limited Raytracing, 10.3TF gpu and 16GB RAM shared across cpu/gpu. all based on Zen 2 (so PCIE 4.0/DDR4)

PC has SSD with 7+ gb/s (with 12-15GB/s next year probably), can run Cyberpunk pathtracing at 70+fps, 30-80TF gpus, and support for PCIE5.0/DDR5. GPUs come with up to 24GB VRAM and of course you can have <128GB RAM.
Dont Get It Fran Healy GIF by Travis
 

onQ123

Member
This is like playing games on a Quadro. It's not for gamers.

Cool on AMD though. The more competition they give Nvidia the better.


PS5 is old news in terms of hardware specs. Slow SSD (5.5gb/s), limited Raytracing, 10.3TF gpu and 16GB RAM shared across cpu/gpu. all based on Zen 2 (so PCIE 4.0/DDR4)

PC has SSD with 7+ gb/s (with 12-15GB/s next year probably), can run Cyberpunk pathtracing at 70+fps, 30-80TF gpus, and support for PCIE5.0/DDR5. GPUs come with up to 24GB VRAM and of course you can have <128GB RAM.
That post went over your head it was most likely a play on the events of the TLOU: P1 PC port thread 😂
 
Last edited:

Celcius

°Temp. member
oof at that blower cooler
I guess that's best for servers though
How much?
 
Last edited:

ToTTenTranz

Banned
oof at that blower cooler
I guess that's best for servers though
How much?

All server cards have blower coolers. They're supposed to go into server racks with substantial internal airflow and placed into rooms with powerful ACs at sub-20ºC.
This is the latest RTX 6000 Ada (RTX 4090 with 48GB):

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Graphics Card | NVIDIA


These GPUs are usually a lot more TDP-limited than their consumer counterparts, which also helps.
 

Hugare

Member
This is like playing games on a Quadro. It's not for gamers.

Cool on AMD though. The more competition they give Nvidia the better.

This is not for games, sure.

But how is it like playing in one of these?

Does it lack some features present in "gaming" cards?

Or is it just like some absurd overkill?
 

Draugoth

Gold Member
This is not for games, sure.

But how is it like playing in one of these?

Does it lack some features present in "gaming" cards?

Or is it just like some absurd overkill?

Should be like Titan RTX Card, peform a bit better than the 7900XTX with the add of extra VRAM
 
But how is it like playing in one of these?

Does it lack some features present in "gaming" cards?
I bought a RTX A2000 (6GB) since nvidia refuses to make a low power 3050/3060 for desktops and I needed a < 70W card, the pcie limit. A 1650 would have been a lesser upgrade to my iGPU, while AMD does not have anything that can be considered an upgrade in that range.
Bought used since new any of those "pro" cards are priced even more insane than regular ones, so it was even cheaper than buying a regular card that would have been slower, just without any warranty.
The chips are kind of similar, maybe more cores deactivated or something and certainly very different power draw, it's kind of like an M-card, at least the low end.
I guess the drivers will not be adapted as fast to new releases and rather be geared towards stable as fuck for the software that is supposed to run on it. But so far I ran in no problems in my rather old library of games. Just Anno in its free weekend showing some weird flickering and not really working together with the VRR monitor or whatever.

Quite a couple of videos exist of people trying P620, T2000 or A2000 or some other number of those generations and none seemed to have problems in games.
 

YCoCg

Member
I mean the result counts, you can play it like that and DLSS makes it look good, so does it matter? Computer graphics main motto is to work smart not hard.
If we start counting fake frames then the territory gets muddy, after all TVs can help consoles look smoother as well if all we're doing is counting frames.
 

M1chl

Currently Gif and Meme Champion
If we start counting fake frames then the territory gets muddy, after all TVs can help consoles look smoother as well if all we're doing is counting frames.
Today these techniques are far more mature, than back in the day with TVs
 

MikeM

Member
This is like playing games on a Quadro. It's not for gamers.

Cool on AMD though. The more competition they give Nvidia the better.


PS5 is old news in terms of hardware specs. Slow SSD (5.5gb/s), limited Raytracing, 10.3TF gpu and 16GB RAM shared across cpu/gpu. all based on Zen 2 (so PCIE 4.0/DDR4)

PC has SSD with 7+ gb/s (with 12-15GB/s next year probably), can run Cyberpunk pathtracing at 70+fps, 30-80TF gpus, and support for PCIE5.0/DDR5. GPUs come with up to 24GB VRAM and of course you can have <128GB RAM.
Compares $500 console to $3k PC

Blow Your Mind Wow GIF by Product Hunt
 
PS5 is old news in terms of hardware specs. Slow SSD (5.5gb/s), limited Raytracing, 10.3TF gpu and 16GB RAM shared across cpu/gpu. all based on Zen 2 (so PCIE 4.0/DDR4)

PC has SSD with 7+ gb/s (with 12-15GB/s next year probably), can run Cyberpunk pathtracing at 70+fps, 30-80TF gpus, and support for PCIE5.0/DDR5. GPUs come with up to 24GB VRAM and of course you can have <128GB RAM.
PC doesnt even have unified memory yet.

n64: 1
PC: 0
 

Honey Bunny

Member
This is like playing games on a Quadro. It's not for gamers.

Cool on AMD though. The more competition they give Nvidia the better.


PS5 is old news in terms of hardware specs. Slow SSD (5.5gb/s), limited Raytracing, 10.3TF gpu and 16GB RAM shared across cpu/gpu. all based on Zen 2 (so PCIE 4.0/DDR4)

PC has SSD with 7+ gb/s (with 12-15GB/s next year probably), can run Cyberpunk pathtracing at 70+fps, 30-80TF gpus, and support for PCIE5.0/DDR5. GPUs come with up to 24GB VRAM and of course you can have <128GB RAM.
True. And PC is old news at the PS5's price point.
 
So I guess you guys want Nvidia to have a monopoly on the GPU market then? Well then stop complaining about their exorbitant pricing.

Competition is good for the market. We want both AMD and Nvidia to thrive. Let Bethesda have their exclusive partnership. It’s good for business.

Edit: whoops posted this in the wrong thread
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom