RTD era had The Parting of the Ways.
Mofftat has The Wedding of River Song.
It's a two way street.
...I quite liked the Wedding of River Song.
RTD era had The Parting of the Ways.
Mofftat has The Wedding of River Song.
It's a two way street.
and my axe...I quite liked the Wedding of River Song.
There's a few episodes I'm always shocked people actually liked - I just have to raise an eyebrow at anyone claiming any great things about Gridlock or Turn Left.
...I quite liked the Wedding of River Song.
I remember showing Midnight to my family after they had watched many episodes from Series 3 and 4 and they were just shocked. It's like the anti-Doctor Who, in a good way.I would argue that Turn Left, Midnight, and The Waters of Mars are all darker and more serious episodes than anything in Moffat's run.
Turn Left is especially brilliant in deconstructing the silliness of the show.
No, not at all! Series 5 is great, Series 6 has some great episodes but a lousy continuing plot, and Series 7... I'm not sure how to feel about it. It's almost split into two different series.I am at season 4 now. I realy enjoy it. But are Moffat seasons bad overall? I hear only bad things about it.
I actually wasn't aware that there were people who didn't like Turn Left.
I think Moffat's era is much better.I am at season 4 now. I realy enjoy it. But are Moffat seasons bad overall? I hear only bad things about it.
I HATED Turn Left, and I think a lot of that had to do with the fact that I couldn't stand Donna. I decided to rewatch it awhile back, and while I still can't stand Donna, I no longer hate Turn Left. It's up there with Midnight and the Waters of Mars as being one of RTDs best.
I am at season 4 now. I realy enjoy it. But are Moffat seasons bad overall? I hear only bad things about it.
I think Series 7 as a whole was really good. The first half were all fantastic episode including the best Dalek story since Dalek, a great western adventure, Rory's Dad and an amazing Angles story. The second part was abit more hit and miss, I think they just tried to do too much in not enough time. I think Clara's story needed a full season to develop to be as amazing as it could have been. That said you still had Bells of Saint John, Journey to the Centre of the TARDIS and The Name of the Doctor as stand outs. The rest from the second half were all still pretty good though, but some of them should have been better than they were such as Cold War and Nightmare in Silver.No, not at all! Series 5 is great, Series 6 has some great episodes but a lousy continuing plot, and Series 7... I'm not sure how to feel about it. It's almost split into two different series.
Wedding of River Song was so disappointing. It suffered from Moffat yet again writing himself into a corner. The payoff ended up being extremely dissatisfying and lazy. The only good parts in my opinion is the ending which has been leading up to this upcoming episode.
I am at season 4 now. I realy enjoy it. But are Moffat seasons bad overall? I hear only bad things about it.
I felt like the Wedding of River Song's main problems were a 1 episode running time, overly predictable resolutions to what were supposed to be interesting mysteries, and the terribly-executed Series 6 plot it had to wrap up.
So basically, I didn't like it, but it was a victim of its circumstances.
(Also, it was stupid how there was no point to River's exo-suit looking like an astronaut suit.)
I am at season 4 now. I realy enjoy it. But are Moffat seasons bad overall? I hear only bad things about it.
To watch Turn Left is to experience a brutal assault via blunt, rusty and conspicuous allegories. The whole episode is trying far too hard to be meaningful and edgy.
EDIT: Midnight and The Waters of Mars are legit amazing, though. Midnight is up with Blink for best episode of the revival.
It has its problems but I wouldn't say it's bad overall. Some of it is really good. The biggest complaints tend to be production related.I am at season 4 now. I realy enjoy it. But are Moffat seasons bad overall? I hear only bad things about it.
EDIT: Also, people calling the Tesselecta a Deus Ex Machina are being a bit unfair. The Tesselecta was introduced well in advance, and it was widely predicted he'd use some sort of copy of himself to cheat death, most people just thought it would be a ganger instead. When a character solves a problem using a previously introduced concept in a way that was well established that's the opposite of a Deus Ex Machina.
Whatever Doctor Donna and Meta Crisis Doctor did to defeat the Daleks, now that was a Deus Ex Machina.
There's a few episodes I'm always shocked people actually liked - I just have to raise an eyebrow at anyone claiming any great things about Gridlock or Turn Left.
That's not the case at all. Moffat just gets everyone's ire because he's the man in the hot seat at the moment. RTD got it just as bad, if not worse, in his day. Doctor Who has been around for so long and it means different things to so many different people. There's always going to be someone to complain about.
Very true. Both Moffat and RTD have their flaws, but I remember during series 4 RTD was getting absolute vitriol flung after him from a lot of the fanbase, and said fanbase went mad with glee when it was announced Moffat would be taking over. Now I see plenty of people talking about how good it was in RTD's era!
I don't think anyone could have foreseen how much better RTD-era Moffat would be compared to Moffat-era Moffat.
I don't think anyone could have foreseen how much better RTD-era Moffat would be compared to Moffat-era Moffat.
there's a DW comic I saw a while ago that I'm looking for. I don't follow this series, so I'm not sure how to describe it: it starts with one doctor with a bowtie, in the next panel he changes into the next incarnation of the doctor, then puts on another bowtie...? I think. Then at the end, it has the current doctor with multiple bowties saying "you guys fucked it up" or something. it's simply drawn with some sparse color.
there's a DW comic I saw a while ago that I'm looking for. I don't follow this series, so I'm not sure how to describe it: it starts with one doctor with a bowtie, in the next panel he changes into the next incarnation of the doctor, then puts on another bowtie...? I think. Then at the end, it has the current doctor with multiple bowties saying "you guys fucked it up" or something. it's simply drawn with some sparse color.
I think people using the term Deus Ex Machina in that case is shorthand for 'not being clever enough'. The resolution kinda feels like something a fan would suggest and in that way it feels unfulfilling somehow. People probably throw the term around to seem clever. Plus its a term that gets associated with eeeevery Doctor Who finale whether its appropriate or not.
I've always found it a kind of difficult thing to apply to anything. For instance, would you consider what Rose does to become Bad Wolf a Deus Ex? She literally pulls God-like powers from the centre of a machine, but the argument against that is the mentions of Bad Wolf through the series. In fact, come to think of it, it's the exactly same thing as Clara does- she becomes all powerful by using a machine to fulfill her previously seen prophecy. You know what, all Doctor Who resolutions suck, thanks a lot RedShift
It's not referring to it that makes it not a deus ex machina, it's the world-breaking nature of it. Bad Wolf is definitely a god in the machine. The rules of the universe are rewritten in ways you could never predict and Bad Wolf being scrawled everywhere doesn't really help you to the conclusion in any way.
The tesselacta is just a Chekhov's Gun. It doesn't do anything surprising at all, it's just a surprise that it happens to be there at that moment, but its powers and capabilities are well established.
The real problem is applying a value judgement to Deus Ex Machina. It's a literary device just like any other and it can be used well or poorly. In the Greek plays the name comes from it was sometimes used as a means to express the idea of the universe having values and sitting in judgement of the character's actions. This is not inherently a bad thing, though it's certainly uncommon to express it so directly in current literature.
That was my point. There is no reason it needed to be a 1960's spacesuit. It was a 1960's spacesuit because Moffat thought that visual of an astronaut coming out of the water would look great and inspire wonder in audiences, but he wasn't able to come up with a convincing reason for why it was a 1960's spacesuit.That's explained in the two parter at the beginning of the series, the entire reason for the Apollo program was that the Silence needed a suit that could keep a human alive in extreme situations. The Doctor outright says that IIRC.
Admittedly it is a bit dumb a time travelling space faring race would need 1960s NASA to build them a spacesuit. And I still don't see why they really needed River at all to be inside this suit that seemed perfectly capable of killing him itself. Maybe they wanted him to not just run from the suit and banked on his personal history with River keeping him there.
I'll concede that the Tesselecta isn't technically a deus ex machina, but even with the setup from Let's Kill Hitler, it still feels like a cheap plot device for Moffat to get himself out of a corner.
Which is kind of the problem with that whole story arc to begin with.
I'll concede that the Tesselecta isn't technically a deus ex machina, but even with the setup from Let's Kill Hitler, it still feels like a cheap plot device for Moffat to get himself out of a corner.
Which is kind of the problem with that whole story arc to begin with.
And this is part of the problem with applying a value judgement to a trope like "Deus ex Machina is always lazy/cheap/stupid." It tempts you to believe the reverse is also true. All cheap plot devices (I disagree this is one, but can see why people feel it is) are not deus ex machina and there's really no need to trot out that particular trope to lend credence to the idea that they are.
End of an era today!
![]()
why does he look so different in this photo?