• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Sony’s Disc-Free 2028 Plan Hands it Total Price Control, Dutch Group Warns in Exclusive Wccftech Statement as €400M Lawsuit Escalates

LectureMaster

Or is it just one of Adam's balls in my throat?



Last week, Sony dropped an explosive news on PlayStation gamers: no more PlayStation discs will be produced from January 2028, thus essentially confining even the retail market to a digital-only future (physical copies will include a download code, just like GTA VI).

This inevitably triggered a massive backlash on the Internet, with fans whipping up petitions to get Sony to change their mind and legendary game designer Hideo Kojima sharing his sadness at the news. But that's not the only kind of reaction Sony needs to deal with.

The Japanese corporation is already defending itself in courts of law around the world over its monopoly on the PlayStation Store. In the US, a class-action settlement over allegedly inflated digital game prices won preliminary approval this spring, though a judge had previously rejected an earlier version of the deal. In the UK, a £2 billion lawsuit dubbed "PlayStation You Owe Us" brought by consumer advocate Alex Neill is now being fought in London's Competition Appeal Tribunal, with Sony arguing that its pricing reflects costs and the value of its platform.

And in the Netherlands, the fight has just begun: after the first hearing a few days ago, Stichting Massaschade & Consument is pressing ahead with the Fair PlayStation case on behalf of around 1.7 million Dutch players, seeking more than €400 million in damages over the so-called "Sony tax."

We reached out to the Dutch non-profit, which brings collective claims on behalf of consumers and small businesses in mass-damage cases, for a comment. Here's what Lucia Melcherts, chair of Stichting Massaschade & Consument, had to say in an exclusive statement to Wccftech:

The end of physical discs removes the last place where a PlayStation game could still be bought and sold at a competitive price. No discs means no second-hand market and no alternative to the PlayStation Store, so from 2028, Sony alone decides what a game costs and even how long you are allowed to use it. That is exactly the harm our Fair PlayStation claim is about: a price can never be fair when the buyer is left with no ownership and no alternative.

Sony's move to phase out discs has only sharpened the broader fight over how PlayStation games are sold, priced, and owned. Between backlash over the scheduled end of physical media and legal challenges in the US, UK, and the Netherlands, the company is facing pressure not just from frustrated players but also from courts, consumer groups, and regulators questioning just how much control one platform should have over an entire market.
 
Where do we sign?

Angry Zach Galifianakis GIF by BasketsFX
 
How would this not apply to Nex Playground OP? The gaming market has too many options.

And shills say we should just accept the future.

They will learn the hard way what rhis is about
I don't understand this thinking. Principled physical buyers could run out and loudly start supporting Switch 2. People who want a competitive software market could build their own machine and buy games from whomever they please. With these options freely available, stamping feet and demanding that a for-profit business compromise said profitability for good boy points accomplishes nothing.

I think Sony would take it a lot more serious if Switch 2 physical game sales giga-spiked this month.
 
Last edited:
This is exactly what we need. Not some stupid "gamer boycotts" or people buying up physical PS5 games in droves like they want to throw even more money Sony's way. Legislation is needed now.
No it's not. Class Action suits are only there to serve grifting lawyers and to make them rich.

You will get this below, and nothing will change.

Bunch of class action lawyers about to get rich while everyone else gets $2.43
 
That thread title is misleading. Neither of the cases cited are about abandoning physical discs.

The US case is about Sony ending vouchers back before COVID

The UK case is about the fairness of Sony's 30% fee

The Netherlands case is also about having no option but to pay Sony's 30% because you can only sell through their storefront.

Both the European cases are similar to Epic's cases against apple/google.

None of them have anything to do with last weeks decision.
 
Go along with the memory manufacturers lawsuits price fixing and market manipulation
Which I haven't seen a single gaming influencer articulate properly or even give me the inkling that they read the entire complaint. That RAM lawsuit is brought by the tech oligarch bros. They want to force RAM makers to build out more production facilities. Probably in hopes of overleveraging them and buying them up for pennies on the dollar. Does that sound like Robin Hood?

Believe it or not, Bruce Wayne didn't bring either of these lawsuits to the table. The people responsible for that have even less of our interests in mind.
 
Last edited:
I hope this puts pressure on Sony to offer a fair marketplace for digital goods and that other online retailers as well as brick and mortar can still offer price competition.
 
Which I haven't seen a single gaming influencer articulate properly or even give me the inkling that they read the entire complaint. That RAM lawsuit is brought by the tech oligarch bros. They want to force RAM makers to build out more production facilities. Probably in hopes of overleveraging them and buying them up for pennies on the dollar. Does that sound like Robin Hood?

Believe it or not, Bruce Wayne didn't bring either of these lawsuits to the table. The people responsible for that have even less of our interests in mind.
That's even worse. I was walking around Bestbuy the other day and still can't believe 64GB of memory js almost 1,000 dollars
 
That thread title is misleading. Neither of the cases cited are about abandoning physical discs.

The US case is about Sony ending vouchers back before COVID

The UK case is about the fairness of Sony's 30% fee

The Netherlands case is also about having no option but to pay Sony's 30% because you can only sell through their storefront.

Both the European cases are similar to Epic's cases against apple/google.

None of them have anything to do with last weeks decision.

Anything to flood the front page on GAF with this stuff they'll do it!
 
That thread title is misleading. Neither of the cases cited are about abandoning physical discs.

The US case is about Sony ending vouchers back before COVID

The UK case is about the fairness of Sony's 30% fee

The Netherlands case is also about having no option but to pay Sony's 30% because you can only sell through their storefront.

Both the European cases are similar to Epic's cases against apple/google.

None of them have anything to do with last weeks decision.
Never let the truth get in the the way of a good headline
 
Whatever gets the ball rolling, but until it rolls somewhere near improving consumer digital rights and regulations around DRM...kinda doesn't matter.
 
Will definitely be interesting to see how it plays out. Although I wonder how much a thing that happens in the future affects a case about past behaviour.

They might try to argue with code in the box stuff but I doubt there is gonna be a meaningful price competition with that shit.
 
No it's not. Class Action suits are only there to serve grifting lawyers and to make them rich.

You will get this below, and nothing will change.
Not talking about this particular lawsuit, but about public attention to the matter in the context of disputes in the court of law. I take it you're not European? Over here this is typically how politicians and the wider public become aware of issues, more often than not leading to new legislation.
 
I'm struggling to understand how Sony can get sued for their business strategy, it's up to them to decide how they want to run their business when there's nothing illegal in taking that direction.
 
Not talking about this particular lawsuit, but about public attention to the matter in the context of disputes in the court of law. I take it you're not European? Over here this is typically how politicians and the wider public become aware of issues, more often than not leading to new legislation.

By the time the PS6 hits the market and Sony games are released exclusively in digital format, hardly anyone will care about it.

The bigger the fire, the faster it burns.
 
Top Bottom