Insane Metal
Gold Member
You don't waste a penalty kick in a World Cup. Terrible try by Bruno.
It's the double bluff, you telegraph which way you are shooting in the hopes that the keeper thinks it's too obvious and so goes the other way.
Why did this cunt shoot in the first place??You don't waste a penalty kick in a World Cup. Terrible try by Bruno.
Neymar willed him!Why did this cunt shoot in the first place??
I knew he rooted for SenegalJay Z confirmed.
No, they're not arguing the use of VAR for red cards. VAR's protocol states you shouldn't look at normal challenges like the one that got Balogun a red card in slow motion, but it should be used for point of contact in a serious foul play challenge. Which they actually have a case for.I think Clay might have misunderstood this.
VAR absolutely can be used for red cards. In fact, direct red card incidents are one of the core match changing situations that VAR is legally allowed to review.
Giving a red card after a VAR review is completely legal and actively encouraged under FIFA and IFAB rules.
From what I understand is that article 27 was used to suspend the mandatory one game ban, but not wipe it completely from record.
"Exclusive: The White House made a direct call to FIFA to ask Gianni Infantino to review Folarin Balogun's red card.FIFA approached for comment and referred to the findings of its independent committee.FIFA sources insist White House influence could not affect the decision due to the powers contained in Article 27 and the independent nature of the disciplinary panel."
It was a harsh red card in the first place, and should never have been given. But this is a bit of a joke tbf, when USA didn't even appeal the ban, but the President makes a phone call? How easily influenced are FIFA?
Next we will have lawyers running on to the pitch to contest a foul.Wait, this is true? I thought it was a joke, but Ben Jacobs has posted it? Jeez, yeh, sure FIFA, daddy Trump didn't sway the decision
Taking legal action over a red card is the most American thing that could happen.Next we will have lawyers running on to the pitch to contest a foul.
How old are you? This is far from the worse in my lifetime.This is the most corrupt world cup i have seen. Fifa is laughably obvious in everything it does (Ea was right to drop them).
Bout 50. Which was more corrupt exactly. Not only the abysmal refereeing but the iran situation. This red card situation. The "hydration" breaks etc etc.How old are you? This is far from the worse in my lifetime.
Agree on the hydration AND also coincidentally agree with maybe not the best refs. I was referring to bigger ticket things but I sound more in agreeance based on your statement.Bout 50. Which was more corrupt exactly. Not only the abysmal refereeing but the iran situation. This red card situation. The "hydration" breaks etc etc.
Bout 50. Which was more corrupt exactly. Not only the abysmal refereeing but the iran situation. This red card situation. The "hydration" breaks etc etc.
It's because Odegard is so slow on the ball and takes forever to make a pass.Norway should be quicker and more daring when attacking. Brazil has no problem going 2 vs 2 or 3 vs 3 while attacking. Norway, for some reason, insists on waiting and reorganizing when they should just run and make an attempt. I think this is the wrong strategy against this Brazil.
Going for the parking lotlmfao Berg what an abysmal shot
Norwegians when they get the opportunity to make an offensive:Norway just has no idea what to do with the ball, it's awful to watch.
Brazil spared them twice, but at this rate a goal is inevitable.
This is the biggest match for most of that team, the gameplan is mostly just to hit the ball in the direction of Haaland.Norwegians when they get the opportunity to make an offensive:
![]()