twilo99
Member
How many points did it cost? I’ve been using mine for ultimate but maybe I can spend some on an actual game for once.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty | Review Thread
- Thread starter analog_future
- Start date
How many points did it cost? I’ve been using mine for ultimate but maybe I can spend some on an actual game for once.
Roni
Gold Member
I was hoping not to get info on that before playing...
mckmas8808
Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
it runs at 60fps on consoles, with almost no loading screens and u have the choice to run at 30fps with RT ON.
Makes you wish they never made the game on PS4 and Xbox One.
The artful mincer
Member
What's the PS4 version like?
GymWolf
Member
You are trying too hard buddy.it runs at 60fps on consoles, with almost no loading screens and u have the choice to run at 30fps with RT ON.
twilo99
Member
Would you even call Starfield cinematic?
Topher
Gold Member
Now we wait for the full complete edition and buy it on PS5 on sale.
Tedditalk
Member
Looking pretty good. Expected release date is 2077.
Pilgrimzero
Member
I'm not even out of Chapter 2 of Baldurs Gate 3 and I started it on PC release day. Someone push back every new game/exp for another month.
Last edited:
Salty Popsicle
Banned
I would have agreed with you about CDPR being the best RPG dev until Cyberpunk 2077 launched in the state it did. The Witcher 3 was my favorite game of the last console generation, so I expected more of the same quality and expanded RPG elements in this game when it released in late 2020. Instead, I had to wait over an year to play this game at an acceptable performance and visual quality on my XSX and it's only now nearly 3 years after launch that we finally get some standard features of most city open-world games like competent police AI. I can't praise them for finally delivering on a vision they promised us in 2020.
Del_X
Member
No lol
But the writing is not great. But I also consider CP2077 closer to an action-adventure game so it's more comparable to whatever open world or single-player story-driven stuff there is.
Nankatsu
Gold Member
GymWolf
Member
BouncyFrag
Member
In my frontal cortex.
FunkMiller
Member
Hmmm. I might have to go back to this after I'm done with Lies Of P, instead of going back to Starfield.
The Cockatrice
Member
It was a joke. Chillax. Tho Cyberpunk with all its issues at launch it was still a better game and ran better than Starfield. I'll take some annoying bugs over loadings every 5 minutes and low FPS. Also lol next gen console 30 FPS Starfield. Imagine the mess it would've been on PS4. K bye.
Last edited:
DonkeyPunchJr
World’s Biggest Weeb
Cyberpunk was great even day 1 on PC despite some bugs. I get that the PS4/X1 versions were atrocious but Jesus Christ. It’s been 3 years. You guys can stop coming into every Cyberpunk thread just to copy/paste the same rant.
Last edited:
Lokaum D+
Member
PS4 and Xbox one was more of a corpo desicion than CDPR imo ( money money money ), at least the owned their shit and didnt droped support for this game, they could pretty much have pulled support like EA did to Anthem, but they didnt.
Thirty7ven
Banned
Been ready for a quality fps rpg.
squarealex
Member
Can't agree more.
People really forget how mess was Cyberpunk 2077 at launch and how many promise are not here.
3 years later, they reboot the game and people claim "yeah hurrah"...
Last edited:
analog_future
Banned
It was a joke. Chillax. Tho Cyberpunk with all its issues at launch it was still a better game and ran better than Starfield. I'll take some annoying bugs over loadings every 5 minutes and low FPS. K bye.
Your opinion is objectively wrong, but you do you.
Salty Popsicle
Banned
If you're going to compare the two games, at least compare them in the condition they both released at. Saying a Cyberpunk 2077 with nearly 3 years' worth of content updates, major bug fixes, and now an expansion is a better experience than a more recent RPG that has been on the market for less than a month is just a disingenuous conversation.
It was a joke. Chillax. Tho Cyberpunk with all its issues at launch it was still a better game and ran better than Starfield. I'll take some annoying bugs over loadings every 5 minutes and low FPS. K bye.
Salty Popsicle
Banned
It wasn't just the last gen versions that launched in a trash state, also the current-gen console versions.
Raven117
Member
Yeah....but...nah..
Structurally, you can compare the two games. How quests are delivered, how one navigates the world...etc. They are both First Person RPGs with very similar mechanics. One can look past bugs and content to look and the basic design philosophy.
Turk1993
GAFs #1 source for car graphic comparisons
Its crazy how much i hated this game at first (it was buggy) but forced myself to play it to see some amazing graphics (the reason i bought the game). But after playing it more and more i quite liked it. And the PT update was the cherry on top for me. Can't wait to play this one with all the new upgrades and changes.
The Cockatrice
Member
Starfield on next-gen consoles is 30 FPS. Cyberpunk on next gen consoles was 60 FPS at launch. What would be the framerate of Starfield if it would've released on PS4 like Cyberpunk, so I can compare? 5 fps? Fucking lol
Last edited:
![L*][*N*K](/data/avatars/m/842/842515.jpg?1696510303){kind=avatar}
L*][*N*K
Banned
tell me, are you interested in Phantom Liberty?
Gate Locker
Member
My 1650 is ready, let's go.
Salty Popsicle
Banned
I am. I've been looking forward to it since I finished my first playthrough of the game years ago. However, I was bummed out once I learned 2 of the 3 planned expansion had been cancelled. Seeing people praise the dev team and the game as the second coming of Jesus for releasing a quality expansion without mentioning that most people have been waiting for these 2.0 features for nearly 3 years is what is grinding my gears a little.
diffusionx
Gold Member
CDPR manipulated reviewers,, showing only the PC version and allowing reviewers to only show footage they provided before release. It was only after the release and the amazing, glowing reviews that the game got what it deserved. But the PC version was extremely buggy and here we are, 3 years later, finally maybe getting something like the game we were told we would get, after 2 gameplay overhauls. I'll be getting Phantom Liberty and looking forward to finally playing this but the entire thing was embarrassing for all involved. ShillUp is forever tainted imo, but he's not the only one.
I also really hate this narrative of "come back" or "redemption" when devs ship unfinished, buggy, crappy piles of shit and then patch it later.
Last edited:
balls of snow
Member
One dev studio went to hell (launch cyberpunk ) and upended their entire way of making games.
The other dev studio went to hell ( Fallout 76) and buried their head in the sand.
Already preordered although with Baldurs Gate 3....lol god knows when I will be able to play this. Also (and this happens to me with all DLCs), after 3 years I completely forgot how to play the game properly, probably it would be better to play it again from scratch with all the improvements since launch.
I'm happy it seems to be great
I'm happy it seems to be great
Roni
Gold Member
Well, at least the username checks out.
Last edited:
Tomeru
Member
GymWolf
Member
After playing Starfield for 50 hours all I can say is:
rodrigolfp
Haptic Gamepads 4 Life
Last edited:
29,250 with level 2 discount
Salty Popsicle
Banned
L*][*N*K
Banned
I don’t get you man, do you want to remind everybody how bad the game was at launch and no one should play this expansion or you want more expansions?? You make no sense I feel like you didn’t sleep well or something
Bojji
Member
I'm playing starfield now (60h?) and I like it but based on CP2077 (base) this expansion will be much better in almost every aspect.