graywolf323
Member
you gotta give them time to be told what their narratives should be, I wouldn’t expect anyone to show up for another 5 minutes
edit: at least not with an actual response
Last edited:
you gotta give them time to be told what their narratives should be, I wouldn’t expect anyone to show up for another 5 minutes
While it is different, it's within Sony's rights to think that if they are paying for a marketing exclusive that it should include not putting the game on Gamepass.Did sony put re8 on Playstation plus? That is the difference. You don't see netflix pay to block content it is not Streaming. Only Sony blocks content from a whole market.
Microsoft execs are hypocrites
So is everyone who is team green going to apologise for saying only Sony were doing this? I won't hold my breath.
Did anymore expect otherwise?
Hendrick's - thoughts?No it's not. Marketing agreements are for marketing. This falls in line with paid exclusivity and is a bullshit tactic no matter who is doing it.
It will fizzle like a wet fart as did the Forza always online, exclusive deals ones, etc.25 pages?
That means this one will hit 30 pages right guys?
Some of those posts, LMAOStreaming services pay for exclusive content all the time. Which in turns keeps it off competitors. Difference here, Sony (and MS, yes they do it too) are not keeping select games off the stores (physical or digital) that they partner with, just sub services.
It will fizzle like a wet fart as did the Forza always online, exclusive deals ones, etc.
Who has it bookmarked? I just searched for it because I remember the shitstorm threads that go 25+ pages but never seem to do in the other direction.
Dude has threads bookmarked, just to laugh at people years later when it turns out he was right
Well Well Well Well... look at that... ALL those Xbox Fanboys that were crying about Sony "Keeping games off gamepass" even though they were told time and time again its part of a marketing deal or timed exclusivity but wouldnt listen. Turns out MS is doing the same thing. I cant believe MS is keeping games off of PS Plus and other sub services... incredible... so anti consumer..its a shame.
Nobody would bat an eye, if it wasn't for the constant whining and hypocrisy from a certain beloved executive group. If you're doing it too, at least shut the fuck up already.Did anymore expect otherwise? It makes perfect sense for them to want to do that.
I don’t think anyone have a shit about it being done in an exclusive deal, that just makes sense. A marketing deal though, preventing a game from going into certain services for a long period after release is a completely different story but warriors gotta do what they do.
Well Well Well Well... look at that... ALL those Xbox Fanboys that were crying about Sony "Keeping games off gamepass" even though they were told time and time again its part of a marketing deal or timed exclusivity but wouldnt listen. Turns out MS is doing the same thing. I cant believe MS is keeping games off of PS Plus and other sub services... incredible... so anti consumer..its a shame.
- Microsoft and SIE both made competing bids for Valheim and Immortality to have those games on their subscription services. Microsoft won both bids.
- Sony typically does not require subscription exclusivity for games included on PS Plus. Microsoft often requires day one Game Pass titles to not be made available on competing subscription services.
He's alerting the discord crew at this very moment.25 pages?
That means this one will hit 30 pages right guys?
I know the gotcha boys are already dancing and singing, but wasn't Microsoft just complaining about Sony moneyhatting to prevent Game Pass deals for games that were NOT on Sony subs?
Who??? Your gonna have to point these people out, so I can point laughEvery Xbox fan on here and across the internet saying only Sony did this, when everyone else said otherwise.
Have a go,Who??? Your gonna have to point these people out, so I can point laugh
Don’t be pussy, just name them.
I don’t think anyone have a shit about it being done in an exclusive deal, that just makes sense. A marketing deal though, preventing a game from going into certain services for a long period after release is a completely different story but warriors gotta do what they do.
And maybe MS actually does also have these restrictions in contracts for games they have marketing rights to, and if so, that’s just as shitty as Sony doing it. But this isn’t the same scenario as the thread linked here.
Didn't know that FFXVI is on PS Plus and is being prevented from joining Game Pass.Such a blanketed tweet. Would be curious to know what games are we talking about. So many AA games on GP I've yet to see anything AAA that wasn't also on PS. Is it anything on the level of FFXVI?
Brace yourselves. It's just warming up.
The problem is Phil Spencer was crying in court the other day about Sony locking exclusives to Playstation whiles he also locking exclusives to Gamepass. Phil Spencer and his team has been the only company in the gaming industry complaining about exclusives and how its bad for gaming. Everyone should play together. Sony and Nintendo or any other gaming company had never complained about exclusives.Did anymore expect otherwise? It makes perfect sense for them to want to do that.
CoD stuff
Have a go,Who??? Your gonna have to point these people out, so I can point laugh
Don’t be pussy, just name them.
Sony wants to leverage their position as market leader to pay off publishers so that Sony doesn't have to compete with Gamepass. Sounds pretty anti-competitive to me...
Anti competitive and a bit whiny to be fair.
This is kinda the next level of that kind of bullshit. It's not paying to give your customers exclusive access, but paying so you can dictate how your competitors customers can access the content. It would be like say Hulu paying to prevent a show from being available as an off-line download on Netflix.
No it's not. Marketing agreements are for marketing. This falls in line with paid exclusivity and is a bullshit tactic no matter who is doing it.
The difference is one side never said they had a problem with exclusives.I think this trial shows both sides do bullshit like this.
Waiting for his article on this,Guys, even better ...
Microsoft claims Sony pays for “blocking rights” to keep games off Xbox Game Pass
The claims were made in legal documents to a Brazilian regulator.www.theverge.com
It's a massive difference if you want to protect you sub investment or if you just want to damage your rival's sub.Believe so. The only "gotcha" here is for anyone who thought this doesn't happen with "both sides".
Such a blanketed tweet. Would be curious to know what games are we talking about. So many AA games on GP I've yet to see anything AAA that wasn't also on PS. Is it anything on the level of FFXVI?
Anti competitive and a bit whiny to be fair.
Theyre the worst of the worst. Xbox under Phil Spencer rather lie non-stop to consumers and push false narratives on their competition while they themselves are doing exactly the same stuff. Instead of spending time, efforts and energy into making "Games" the best they can be, they rather lie everyday. Its like they rather sell lies than sell games.Microsoft execs are hypocrites
Can you please stop being mean and tell Xbox fans what PR like to hook in next ?Every Xbox fan on here and across the internet saying only Sony did this, when everyone else said otherwise.
It's a massive difference if you want to protect you sub investment or if you just want to damage your rival's sub.
Blocking a game from a competing service accomplishes both so how is there any difference at all?