It's a digital signal so there shouldn't be any difference at all, either the 0s and 1s get through or they don't.I'm sure somebody could measure a difference in picture quality with a high end HDMI cable but i doubt the average human would see one.
The standard cable is not particularly protected against external influences and also made from copper. It is a digital signal that is transported in an analog way that could be affected by interference.It's a digital signal so there shouldn't be any difference at all, either the 0s and 1s get through or they don't.
The standard cable is not particularly protected against external influences and also made from copper. It is a digital signal that is transported in an analog way that could be affected by interference.
I’ve solved for this by installing flux capacitors in my houseThe standard cable is not particularly protected against external influences and also made from copper. It is a digital signal that is transported in an analog way that could be affected by interference.
This is definitely true and why I bought fiber optic HDMI cables for my PS5 and XSX. I get less handshake issues as well.The standard cable is not particularly protected against external influences and also made from copper. It is a digital signal that is transported in an analog way that could be affected by interference.
You sound like a Best Buy employee trying to sell Monster cables.
There’s literally no difference, you will never run into signal interference on an HDMI cable unless it’s broken.
I never tried to convince the OP to buy a high end cable but i needed to point out that it is not as simple as Boss Mog belive it is. Sure under most circumstances there won't be any interference or differences in picture quality.I’ve solved for this by installing flux capacitors in my house
I needed to get a longer hdmi for my set up and if I remember correctly when i tested the bandwidth the one in the box was at least 40gbps if not 48. I was mostly testing the cables I was trying to replace it with and that was a shit show. That old “all hdmi cables are the same” slogan is not true.
I also used an fiber optic HDMI cable for the PS5 initially but ran into problems where the cable would overheat so that i couldn't even touch it. Not sure what caused it but i went back to analog.This is definitely true and why I bought fiber optic HDMI cables for my PS5 and XSX. I get less handshake issues as well.
Sounds like something your old lady tells you about your peckerCoat your cables in wax for a free boost in performance.
Sounds like something your old lady tells you about your pecker
I don’t understand.Sigh
Out of the mouth of babes.I don’t understand.
Been using the included cables with PS5,never had any issues.This is definitely true and why I bought fiber optic HDMI cables for my PS5 and XSX. I get less handshake issues as well.
Is that why you see those gold encrusted cables that cost like an extra tenner?The standard cable is not particularly protected against external influences and also made from copper. It is a digital signal that is transported in an analog way that could be affected by interference.
Unless the wax comes out your ears it ain't free!Coat your cables in wax for a free boost in performance.
I don’t know. I didn’t watch that video because it’s something about pentiums. If you’re still talking about hdmi cables not being all the same, they aren’t. The first version of Apple 4ktv for example. The included cable doesn’t work as well as the cable they include with the new version since they updated to DV. OP mentions 2.1 as being his concern for compatibility and in that case, there are very different hdmi cables out there and going by whatever the manufacturer or seller lists is no guarantee.Out of the mouth of babes.
I don’t know. I didn’t watch that video because it’s something about pentiums. If you’re still talking about hdmi cables not being all the same, they aren’t. The first version of Apple 4ktv for example. The included cable doesn’t work as well as the cable they include with the new version since they updated to DV. OP mentions 2.1 as being his concern for compatibility and in that case, there are very different hdmi cables out there and going by whatever the manufacturer or seller lists is no guarantee.
Gold-plated connectors are used for a better protection against oxidation. It has nothing to do with the electrical shielding.Is that why you see those gold encrusted cables that cost like an extra tenner?
That’s weird. They are one directional. Did you have it plugged in correctly?I also used an fiber optic HDMI cable for the PS5 initially but ran into problems where the cable would overheat so that i couldn't even touch it. Not sure what caused it but i went back to analog.
Yes. Double checked. Worked for quite some time but at some point to picture went black and came back. Afterwards the console shut down and when i looked for the cables and touched the HDMI cable i nearly burnt myself.That’s weird. They are one directional. Did you have it plugged in correctly?
Gold-plated connectors are used for a better protection against oxidation. It has nothing to do with the electrical shielding.
It is a digital cable… or it works or it not work… when it works it exactly the same with any cable.I'm sure somebody could measure a difference in picture quality with a high end HDMI cable but i doubt the average human would see one.
The only real reason to exchange it would be the short length.
Both seem to be fine from their suggestive features.
What do you reckon? Yay or nay?
There's this one also https://www.amazon.co.uk/Cable-Maxonar-Certified-Ultra-48Gbps/dp/B0969CQZYN/ref=mp_s_a_1_8?crid=U3P4R72G3EXO&keywords=hdmi+2.1+cable&qid=1638536131&sprefix=Hdmi+2,aps,74&sr=8-8&th=1&psc=1
based on those reviews it looks hit or miss. Some said it passed diagnostic and some say it has 2.1 issues. I’d go with mono price or belkin that claims 48gbps if you don’t have a way to test. Are you using a 2.1 receiver or direct to tv?
What do you reckon? Yay or nay?
There's this one also https://www.amazon.co.uk/Cable-Maxonar-Certified-Ultra-48Gbps/dp/B0969CQZYN/ref=mp_s_a_1_8?crid=U3P4R72G3EXO&keywords=hdmi+2.1+cable&qid=1638536131&sprefix=Hdmi+2,aps,74&sr=8-8&th=1&psc=1
I don't think that the HDMI cable, that is provided with the PS5, is digital.It is a digital cable… or it works or it not work… when it works it exactly the same with any cable.
They are all digital. You’re thinking maybe fiber vs copper? The difference is in the designation and even that is based on a spread. It’s best to focus on bandwidth within each protocol. So, hdmi 2.1 can be as low as 18gbps i think or as a high as say, 48gbps. The higher the bandwidth the better the cable and the least amount of issues that should arise.I don't think that the HDMI cable, that is provided with the PS5, is digital.
All HDMI cables are digital.I don't think that the HDMI cable, that is provided with the PS5, is digital.
I don't think that the HDMI cable, that is provided with the PS5, is digital.
You need at lest something like this:
Otherwise you might as well have stayed on PS4
HDMI carries a digital signal.
Usually with digital signals you either get the full signal or you simply don't get anything, you can't only get a partial amount of it, it's either 100% or 0%. So a $1000 cable is going to give you the same image as a $20 one.
Usually the more expensive cables (I'm talking the $30-50 range, not the ridiculous stuff I posted above) just have better build quality and should last longer before needing to be replaced, specially if you are going to be moving or plugging and unplugging it a lot (to connect different devices). But you won't be getting a better picture from them.
You need at lest something like this:
Otherwise you might as well have stayed on PS4
HDMI carries a digital signal.
Usually with digital signals you either get the full signal or you simply don't get anything, you can't only get a partial amount of it, it's either 100% or 0%. So a $1000 cable is going to give you the same image as a $20 one.
Usually the more expensive cables (I'm talking the $30-50 range, not the ridiculous stuff I posted above) just have better build quality and should last longer before needing to be replaced, specially if you are going to be moving or plugging and unplugging it a lot (to connect different devices). But you won't be getting a better picture from them.
The standard cable is not particularly protected against external influences and also made from copper. It is a digital signal that is transported in an analog way that could be affected by interference.
Maybe it just applied partially to the HDMI cable but it sure is not a bizarre claim in general.Thanks for taking me back to 1992, when I would read audio magazines at the library filled with bizarre claims such as “green marker on your CD makes it sound better”.
HDMI from ps5 to new TV. Only setting it up tomorrow.
based on those reviews it looks hit or miss. Some said it passed diagnostic and some say it has 2.1 issues. I’d go with mono price or belkin that claims 48gbps if you don’t have a way to test. Are you using a 2.1 receiver or direct to tv?
They are all digital. You’re thinking maybe fiber vs copper? The difference is in the designation and even that is based on a spread. It’s best to focus on bandwidth within each protocol. So, hdmi 2.1 can be as low as 18gbps i think or as a high as say, 48gbps. The higher the bandwidth the better the cable and the least amount of issues that should arise.
HDMI carries a digital signal.
Usually with digital signals you either get the full signal or you simply don't get anything, you can't only get a partial amount of it, it's either 100% or 0%. So a $1000 cable is going to give you the same image as a $20 one.
Usually the more expensive cables (I'm talking the $30-50 range, not the ridiculous stuff I posted above) just have better build quality and should last longer before needing to be replaced, specially if you are going to be moving or plugging and unplugging it a lot (to connect different devices). But you won't be getting a better picture from them.
Ok i was wrong. Sorry...All HDMI cables are digital.
At least i knew this one.And if you are talking about Fiber… the HDMI cables will start to lose signal after 50 feet when it is really needed to change to Fiber to reach longer distances.
It's a digital signal so there shouldn't be any difference at all, either the 0s and 1s get through or they don't.
Unless you need a longer cable the one included works. You can load up a game that runs 4K @ 120 and go to your tv diagnostics and it will tell you what you’re getting with the game on. If you go to your corrent output on the console it only shows what is available I believe.HDMI from ps5 to new TV. Only setting it up tomorrow
Yeah except I never said anything about bandwidth. Obviously certain cables are classified at higher bandwidth and can therefor move more 0s and 1s per second than others which is required if you want more resolution and higher framerates, that's basic common sense. What I'm referring to is image quality when running at spec. As long as your cable can reliably operate at spec you'll get the same image no matter what you spend. Your video even points out that with jitter in digital signals the most likely outcome is complete loss of signal or at the very least huge artifacting. My point was if you get a clean crisp picture from a $15 cable, getting a $100 cable isn't going to make that picture any clearer or crisper.This is a long believed internet "truth" but not exactly true
I Spent a THOUSAND Dollars on HDMI Cables.. for Science - YouTube
Whether that difference matters is another question, but the whole the signal either gets through or doesn't because digital thing is a myth. That said, Sony's is more than good enough, and this is particularly about the cheapest stuff on long cables.
I agree. But I’ve seen cables in the same price range offer more or less pop than another when similarly specced. Like one will have a higher contrast or appear brighter. Brand new cables with the same components and inputs used so the settings were identical. There’s some funky shit going on out there.Yeah except I never said anything about bandwidth. Obviously certain cables are classified at higher bandwidth and can therefor move more 0s and 1s per second than others which is required if you want more resolution and higher framerates, that's basic common sense. What I'm referring to is image quality when running at spec. As long as your cable can reliably operate at spec you'll get the same image no matter what you spend. Your video even points out that with jitter in digital signals the most likely outcome is complete loss of signal or at the very least huge artifacting. My point was if you get a clean crisp picture from a $15 cable, getting a $100 cable isn't going to make that picture any clearer or crisper.