Tschumi
Member
I have made this thread to guage community consensus on just how valid the response to certain instability issues in Cyberpunk 2077 has been.
I'm personally in the "this game, like Witcher 3 and so many other games, will be patched - PS4/xbone users shouldn't expect much on a console from 2013" camp.
I feel this poll had call to be conducted considering the huge losses CDPR are suffering, and the game being removed from PlayStation store, all despite the obvious promise of patches and a genuinely good game hidden beneath the furore. It's topical.
I'm personally in the "this game, like Witcher 3 and so many other games, will be patched - PS4/xbone users shouldn't expect much on a console from 2013" camp.
I feel this poll had call to be conducted considering the huge losses CDPR are suffering, and the game being removed from PlayStation store, all despite the obvious promise of patches and a genuinely good game hidden beneath the furore. It's topical.
I'm not trying to strawman or belittle anyone, these are just spoof narratives I've come up with on my own, of varying degrees of hysteria:
A) Here we are again, a much hyped game has stumbled out of the gate and it's stacks on the mill.
Perhaps this:
B) For the first time ever, a game has stumbled out of the blocks, let's make absolutely certain that this is firmly shut down so as to encourage future developers to maintain decades of impeccable standards.
Perhaps this:
C) Performance of this game is flawed on a weighty percentage of the platforms people are trying to play it on - including one from Nov. 2013 - we must detonate CDPR!
Perhaps this:
D) Unlike Witcher 3 - which ran like hot butter on release* - a game which is massively more graphically ambitious (whilst ported to play on the same consoles as Witcher 3) is unacceptably imperfect.
*Not true, in case you didn't pick up on this sarcasm
Perhaps a more valid point:
This game needs work for some platforms in particular, but it is hardly a capital offense that it is scratchy considering it's ambition, the broad range of hardware it must run on, and the sins of other games - just look at AC: Unity, No Man's Sky, etc.
A) Here we are again, a much hyped game has stumbled out of the gate and it's stacks on the mill.
Perhaps this:
B) For the first time ever, a game has stumbled out of the blocks, let's make absolutely certain that this is firmly shut down so as to encourage future developers to maintain decades of impeccable standards.
Perhaps this:
C) Performance of this game is flawed on a weighty percentage of the platforms people are trying to play it on - including one from Nov. 2013 - we must detonate CDPR!
Perhaps this:
D) Unlike Witcher 3 - which ran like hot butter on release* - a game which is massively more graphically ambitious (whilst ported to play on the same consoles as Witcher 3) is unacceptably imperfect.
*Not true, in case you didn't pick up on this sarcasm
Perhaps a more valid point:
This game needs work for some platforms in particular, but it is hardly a capital offense that it is scratchy considering it's ambition, the broad range of hardware it must run on, and the sins of other games - just look at AC: Unity, No Man's Sky, etc.