• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Next-Gen PS5 & XSX |OT| Console tEch threaD

Status
Not open for further replies.

kyliethicc

Member
What I said is that if they assume they're selling a controller-less SKU to people who already have Xbox, then most probably they already are Gamepass subscribers. They need new subscriptions.
Oh yeah my bad. I agree they gotta include a controller. You‘re right about it being for new customers.
 

Neo Blaster

Member
Folks who want a next gen console but aren't concerned with 4k. Folks that don't want to walk around in public with a controller strapped to their phone but also want to play halo,MW,2K without paying $500 for a Vidya box

casuals make up 66% of the gaming community. Consoles launches and the industry as a whole is hyper focused around the holidays for a reason. expect to see the xss outsell more than just the XSX IMHO
MS will have to price it really low if they want casuals already gaming on One on 1080p to migrate, they will have the same games after all.
 

Dolomite

Member
"I want a next gen console to play all the same games available from a 2013 box for the next two years but don't care about resolution (yet still want to "upgrade" from a 1080p console that's already on the market)"

I bet there are tons of casual gamers who can't wait to upgrade from playing 2K at 1080p 60fps on PS4/Xbox One to playing 1080p 60fps on Lockhart. I bet it's the reason why were 3 months from a new console launch and it hasn't even been announced. MS don't want the casuals to line up too early!
You say that facetiously, but the vast majority of the gaming community don't have 4K monitors or TVs. OLED's? even less. Most people I know or work with have current gen consoles just to fuck around with or bust out at a party. Getting a Ps5 or "the new xbox" is more of a festive console launch experience/holiday purchase than Upgrading Next Gen hardware for many. I'm sorry to break it to Gaf, but the vast majority of PS5s and XSX/S sold will not be of credit any to Hardcore enthusiast.

Folks will purchase the Ps5 with a sub 4k TV then gladly pay $100 to play the "nexgen" version of 2k on Christmas day, smiling all the way and you know it. No different with the cheaper next gen console option
 

Dolomite

Member
MS will have to price it really low if they want casuals already gaming on One on 1080p to migrate, they will have the same games after all.
Hence the axing of the 1X. The X1 will drop in price to basically $Free.99

Look, I'm not personally expecting the XSS to do Nintendo Wii numbers, but it's plain naive to underestimate the amount of folks that will purchase "the hot new thing" at a cheaper value during a pandemic Holiday market.
If paying attention to xcloud and Gamepass has taught us anything, it's that this little($250?) box plus a $10 subscrbtion of free games can feed a family of casuals/college Bros/ nostalgic 50 yr old "I'm too busy for videogames" audience well
 
Last edited:

Dolomite

Member
But putting Steam on the XSX would then stifle their own Game Pass sales.
The biggest quandary.

It would take Gabe and Spence in a room egos asside wallets out for that merger. Gamepass library integrated with steam on PC, steam access on consoles with Gamepass subscription
 
Sucks for xbox. They will be building games for HDD the whole of next gen. They are not going to drop potential PC sales. With the amount of non SSD gamers on that side. And scaling talk. Looking rough on the green side.
 

IntentionalPun

Ask me about my wife's perfect butthole
The biggest quandary.

It would take Gabe and Spence in a room egos asside wallets out for that merger. Gamepass library integrated with steam on PC, steam access on consoles with Gamepass subscription
EA is starting to put EA Access on Steam.

But Gamepass is pretty different and likely not coming to Steam lol

However I could see MS first party letting you download the Steam copy of any game they make if you have Gamepass. And Valve would let them do it for cheap, or even free.
 
Bring back Kinect?

No

UltimateVigorousBirdofparadise-size_restricted.gif
 

Dolomite

Member
Sucks for xbox. They will be building games for HDD the whole of next gen. They are not going to drop potential PC sales. With the amount of non SSD gamers on that side. And scaling talk. Looking rough on the green side.
Why would you think that?
And Then why would you type it on purpose? Xbox is only supporting current gen for the next yr+

Xcloud is upgrading it's server to SXS blades in about 6 months. Quite literally everyone will benefit from an SSD this gen. Even casuals via streaming
 
Why would you think that?
And Then why would you type it on purpose? Xbox is only supporting current gen for the next yr+

Xcloud is upgrading it's server to SXS blades in about 6 months. Quite literally everyone will benefit from an SSD this gen. Even casuals via streaming

I'm guessing at some point SSDs will become part of the minimum system requirements on PC. No idea if there's enough gamers right now with fast SSDs for that to be feasible.
 

Sinthor

Gold Member
Been one of the dumbest and most annoying rumors in a while... all based on Microsoft.. RAISING THE PRICE lol

Wait a second....where did that rumor come from then? I thought people showed that the Xbox Gold service wasn't able to be purchased anymore. How did this work out to be Gold costing TWICE what it did instead? I am seriously baffled right now. :)
 
How much does a controller really contribute to costs? I thought it was like $10-15? 🤷‍♂️

Now you make it seem like it's an anti consumer decision.

Basically they would be forcing people to buy a 60$ controller instead of bundling it with the system for 10$-15$.

Yeah I doubt they would do something like this if it reduces the price by 10$-15$.
 

DaGwaphics

Member
Don't the controllers retail for like $60 these days?

They are sold at a profit but I doubt it's such a high margin.

In the past, controllers and all the accessories were big money makers, both for the brand and the retailer. Maybe that has changed a great deal.

Edit: Here's that old BOM estimate for PS4/Xbone that made the rounds back in the day.

489808


If anything, the XSX version is very well refined and is cheaper to produce than the original X1 design. But again, who knows.
 
Last edited:

Dolomite

Member
I'm guessing at some point SSDs will become part of the minimum system requirements on PC. No idea if there's enough gamers right now with fast SSDs for that to be feasible.
Not expecting it from the PC space for a few yrs. Ultra version requirements x-gigs of ram,SSD 2600 super ect"
 
Not expecting it from the PC space for a few yrs. Ultra version requirements x-gigs of ram,SSD 2600 super ect"

Hmm just means that if they want it to be playable on PCs they will probably have to build the games around mechanical drives.

I just hope this doesn't last long.

Probably half-assed but these are consoles we’re talking about, devs will make it sing.

Well that doesn't sound to good. I guess we have to wait and see what they say about it.
 
Last edited:

kyliethicc

Member
Wait a second....where did that rumor come from then? I thought people showed that the Xbox Gold service wasn't able to be purchased anymore. How did this work out to be Gold costing TWICE what it did instead? I am seriously baffled right now. :)
Xbox Live Gold used to be able to purchased for $60 for 1 year, $25 for 3 months (effectively $100/year), or $10 for 1 month (effectively $120/year). PS Plus uses this pricing too. But now Xbox Live can only be bought for 3 months or 1 month.

They got rid of the year option, raising the minimum annual cost from $60 to $100, but really $120 for many who will just sub monthly for $10. So it’s basically twice as expensive as PS Plus now.

So yeah when Microsoft quietly says “fuck you pay us double“ everyone hears “it’ll be free soon” ... and I don’t get it.
 
Last edited:

IntentionalPun

Ask me about my wife's perfect butthole
In the past, controllers and all the accessories were big money makers, both for the brand and the retailer. Maybe that has changed a great deal.

Edit: Here's that old BOM estimate for PS4/Xbone that made the rounds back in the day.

489808


If anything, the XSX version is very well refined and is cheaper to produce than the original X1 design. But again, who knows.

Well aside from being estimates, that's someone's estimated BOM not Cost (cost of goods sold.)

edit: Don't get me wrong they are money makers for sure either way
 
Last edited:

Sinthor

Gold Member
but sony didnt make it a better game for thier customers... they made sure others didnt get a better game

it doesnt effect sony players either way (whether it was exclusive or not)

its kinda sad to think otherwise, its a pure business move and it is anti consumer, those are facts... fanboys get to gloat but sony aint making the game better for them, as i said

You know, it's funny how perspective changes everything, right? So when Chrysler started offering electronic anti-lock brakes in the early 70's that was anti-consumer? Any number of other examples. Apple's app store..anti consumer. It all depends on the consumer, right? For the consumers of a specific brand, like in this case, some exclusive bell and whistle are advantages or bonuses. If we're going to call all such things that don't expressly work to the benefit of ALL consumers 'anti-consumer' then we're going to be busy beavers indeed.

I get what people are saying, but exclusivity deals, while being annoying for those impacted more negatively, are also POSITIVE for other consumers. Given the install base disparity between Sony and MS, one COULD argue that these deals benefit the vast majority of the console gaming consumers.

Bottom line, I get it. The complaints are fine as well- it is what it is. I remember people complaining non-stop over Microsoft's 'moneyhat' deals in the 360 era. But in the end, that was Microsoft trying to expand their position radically and compete against an established market leader. I'm not sure that was a major factor, but the 360 generation was certainly their most successful.

I don't personally like exclusivity and even timed exclusivity deals, because they potentially have a negative effect on me. For example, I'd like to play Hellblade 2 as soon as it comes out- I really liked the first one. But...Microsoft is going to use this, whether as a full exclusive or a timed one, to try and drive adoption of their hardware product. I respect that.

I just really don't think there's any way to do away with these types of deals. Manufacturers of ANY product will always try to include features above and beyond their competition to give themselves an advantage. It just strikes me as a bit entitled to try and couch any such situation as 'anti-consumer' as if all consumers are a monolith or that there's one 'pro consumer' way of doing things. Not ripping on anyone complaining about this- this is just my opinion on it after thinking about the issue over the years and in more than just the gaming market.
 

DaGwaphics

Member
Well aside from being estimates, that's someone's estimated BOM not Cost (cost of goods sold.)

True, it's just hard to believe that a controller could drop the price $50 (speaking from a manufacturing cost perspective). The controller doesn't have a revenue tail on it's own, unlike say the BR drive on the PS5 DE. But, maybe if the unit is really small, you might have additional packaging/shipping savings. 🤷‍♂️
 

IntentionalPun

Ask me about my wife's perfect butthole
True, it's just hard to believe that a controller could drop the price $50 (speaking from a manufacturing cost perspective). The controller doesn't have a revenue tail on it's own, unlike say the BR drive on the PS5 DE. But, maybe if the unit is really small, you might have additional packaging/shipping savings. 🤷‍♂️
Yeah I don't think the cost savings is $50.

But if you assume a high percentage eventually have to give you $60 for a new controller when the cheeto stains ruin their old one, it's a wash in the end.

However this is yet another pulled out of someone's ass Xbox rumor... lol.. so probably not true either way
 

Darklor01

Might need to stop sniffing glue
True, it's just hard to believe that a controller could drop the price $50 (speaking from a manufacturing cost perspective). The controller doesn't have a revenue tail on it's own, unlike say the BR drive on the PS5 DE. But, maybe if the unit is really small, you might have additional packaging/shipping savings. 🤷‍♂️

The controller wouldn’t drop the console cost by $50, the cost would drop by $50 by not including the controller as a way to market the value of the deal and sell more hardware. It’s win win.
If you have a controller, you save $50 and maybe that convinces you to buy the console. If you don’t, it nets back to the same price as the console would have including the controller by you needing to buy one separately.
Edit: Any way the get you to buy the box gets you to buy the software and services where the real money is made for them.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom