• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Next-Gen PS5 & XSX |OT| Console tEch threaD

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think what Phil said rings true. They are aiming for GaaS, and PS5 are going for the classical AAA games.

So, objectively speaking, MS are no longer competing with Sony, as Phil said. They are aiming to create their own market, which is different to the market Nintendo and Sony compete in. MS's GaaS competes with Amazon and other companies, whether hardcore gamer's accept that quality of games remains to be seen.

I believe Sony has already been complacent due to recent competitor showcase. Their recent SOP was supposed to be strong, but due to MS's GaaS focus, they seems to have cooled down as well. (This part is my opinion based on how things played out)
Xbox has announced many AAA games:

Halo Infinite
Forza Motorsport
Fable
Avowed
State of Decay 3
Senua's Saga: Hellblade II
Everwild
Age of Empires 4
Flight Simulator

And then we have a ton of unannounced stuff:

Gears 6 (likely)
InXile's AAA game
The Initiative's AAA (AAAA!) game
Forza Horizon 5 (Likely)
Compulsion's next project (they are staffing up to 100+ people, so likely AAA or close)
And who knows what Doublefine will be doing?

Now some of that is GAAS and some of that is not. Games like Avowed, Fable, Hellblade II, the singleplayer portions of Halo and Gears, likely InXile's game, The Initiative's game, Compulsion's game and Doublefine's game (thought they could release a few AA games instead) won't be GAAS but instead singleplayer and story driven (the stuff Sony fans like).

Oh... and all that stuff will be on Game Pass. Xbox is gonna be amazing this gen, but it'll take some time to fight the current hardcore gaming narrative around here and other forums.
 
Yes but not, maybe I don't explain as I want.

I say is between 2070 and 2070 super because that is the same DF say time ago (not because I don't like in general what Alex do means I don't think they have real connections)
I also think is more than that but I cannot guess without have any evidence.

I tried to make opinions not based in extrapolate things because is too easy to get wrong and was pointing a scenario where PS5 basically doesn't have any special thing,
then use that as argument because when your are in debate one the best ways to denying another person's argument is using a scenario where things go wrong and still
showing that even in that scenario the other person's is wrong.

Regarding your points:

1)We suppose RDNA 2 will have an improvement in IPC but how nobody really knows how much, the optimizations will occurs yes will do but again you need to extrapolate
things to say a quantity about how much will improve, guess as base for an argument is fail in the fallacy of ad ignorantiam, yes I agree with you but I cannot use as fallacy
my argument.

2) There is not a point to throwing numbers especially as you say in console where exists low level optimizations and in a early phase of dev is just pointless.

3)Agree but I don't have real proves the same thing until AMD doesn't reveal more info of RDNA 2 I just cannot.

4)You basically repeat this point

5)I want the jump in IPC of RDNA 2 be big because:

a)Nvidia needs competition

b) I love the console hardware.

But AMD usually tends to oversell expectatives then come back with something not so good, so let's wait and see.

6) 10% is not be conservative and again you are guessing a lot

7) You cannot say a number of possible in an argument where you talk about a possible bottleneck, is just too complex to reduce it in that way, you should has
access to a dev kit and break your NDA to say a number

8) Even when I think PS5 is more capable in the real world than a 2070 super that doesn't mean I will say a comparable GPU which I think is equiparble based in
huge amount extrapolations, I am not moore's law is dead.

And yes you throw many specific numbers to get to the point where a PS5 is a 2080 super. I can agree the real performance of PS5 is closer to a 2080 to a 2070
but I don't want to make mental gymnastics to end saying a fallacy, so basically I agree with you my 2070 is too conservative but I prefer say that than do the same
as you.

Sorry for the wall of text.
But RX5700xt is already as good as 2070 super and PS5 is 13% stronger than RX5700XT in raw power without considering change in architecture.
So he is logically right, PS5 is equivalent to RTX2080 Super. Also from Gears 5 demo, it seems that XSX could be little stronger than 2080 super as it was running with same performance and extra graphics features. So his guess is not bad at all.
 

jimbojim

Banned
fy3Z.gif


This is comedy GOLD :

sQwxyme.jpg


10Rkrm1.jpg


gaVWqxh.jpg


EDIT: of course, he blame others for taking his words differently
 
Last edited:

On Demand

Banned
I can’t believe y’all are discussing an exclusive DLC character. Like seriously? Don’t be like desetera getting all dramatic over this. They never liked the game anyway going by the threads about it. All of a sudden Sony announces Spider-Man on PS4 and they start crying. There’s definitely concern trolling going on. Especially after it got known Sony locking up a lot of 3rd party games.

This has got to be the dumbest thing to complain about I’ve ever seen.

Yet nobody said a thing about MS making Yakuza 7 graphics upgrade exclusive to series X.

And not a word about all those timed exclusives after that shit talker said it wouldn’t be done again


So forgive me if I couldn’t care less if Sony has an exclusive character. And that hypocrites are actually mad that Sony does these kinds of deals.
 
Last edited:

IntentionalPun

Ask me about my wife's perfect butthole
I can’t believe y’all are discussing an exclusive DLC character. Like seriously? Don’t be like desetera getting all dramatic over this. They never liked the game anyway going by the threads about it. All of sudden Sony announces Spider-Man on PS4 and they start crying. There’s definitely concern trolling going on. Especially after it got known Sony locking up a lot of 3rd party games.

It's the overall practice I'm discussing; not one individual instance.

And I'm certainly not concern trolling; I own a PS4 and will pre-order PS5 the second it's out. What does resetera have to do with it?

The fact concern trolls exist shouldn't be used to negate people's conversations. We had a pretty rational / level headed discussion on it here, your post helps nothing.
 

On Demand

Banned
It's the overall practice I'm discussing; not one individual instance.

And I'm certainly not concern trolling; I own a PS4 and will pre-order PS5 the second it's out. What does resetera have to do with it?

The fact concern trolls exist shouldn't be used to negate people's conversations. We had a pretty rational / level headed discussion on it here, your post helps nothing.

I wasn’t even specifically talking about you or anyone. I just generally find the discussion about this situation ridiculous.

It’s really not that big of a deal. It’s apart of the business and always has been. It’s annoying sometimes but what can you do.
 

FunkMiller

Member
fy3Z.gif


This is comedy GOLD :

sQwxyme.jpg


10Rkrm1.jpg


gaVWqxh.jpg


EDIT: of course, he blame others for taking his words differently

I’d be genuinely interested in a run down of what journalistic qualifications a lot of these games journalists actually have. Because a lot of the time it feels like most of them don’t really know the best practice for reporting on developments in the gaming industry.
 
Last edited:

JonnyMP3

Member
But RX5700xt is already as good as 2070 super and PS5 is 13% stronger than RX5700XT in raw power without considering change in architecture.
So he is logically right, PS5 is equivalent to RTX2080 Super. Also from Gears 5 demo, it seems that XSX could be little stronger than 2080 super as it was running with same performance and extra graphics features. So his guess is not bad at all.
And still there hasn't been a mention that the PS5 GPU runs at a higher frequency at 2.23Ghz. So it's also rendering quicker than all the PC cards.
 
It is when they feel threatened by the competition. It's the only reason why they are doing this.

Have the two engage in fierce competition should be seen as a good thing not a bad one.

Exactly, exclusive war is what gamers need. Aggressive sony will put Microsoft on a survival mode similar to 360 put ps3 on survival mode back in the day. I am just afraid microsoft pulls a Sega and we all loose😂
Fail Spencer is not Peter Moore
 

xPikYx

Member
I remember when PS4 launched and people compared it to gtx 750ti, calling it weak and advices was given to buy gtx 760 instead to have better graphic than PS. I don't recall gtx760 owners to play anything like uncharted4/tlou2 level of graphic in the end. Before PS4 I was PC gamer. Best games I've played this gen were almost always exclusive titles ( zelda, sony titles and rdr2 or Witcher 3 from PC/xbox ive liked quantum break more than most of players. But beside QB, MS was miserable )
Sure but overtime pc gaming is getting better and better, my last consoles were ps3/360/wii. With ps4/one I preferred PC and hope Sonybis gonna convince me to buy a PS5 but for the moment I stick with PC
 

Neo Blaster

Member
I would HOPE that MS would keep Xbox gong even if' it's another generation topping out at ~50 million sales.. but I just doubt they will.. and I have my doubts MS will even sell that many boxes.. and without those sales, I have my doubts they'll sell enough services to justify their existence.
This is why I think they are extremely dependent on the success of Xcloud. MS must reach a huge amount of Gamepass subscriptions to have a reasonable profit, but for that to happen they need more than Xbox/PC, they must reach smartphones, smart TVs and many other devices like Netflix does.
 

IntentionalPun

Ask me about my wife's perfect butthole
This is why I think they are extremely dependent on the success of Xcloud. MS must reach a huge amount of Gamepass subscriptions to have a reasonable profit, but for that to happen they need more than Xbox/PC, they must reach smartphones, smart TVs and many other devices like Netflix does.
Right.. that's my main concern I've brought up a bunch here.

That MS has sold their leadership on the future of Xbox by claiming xCloud will bring in millions and millions of customers.

They didn't get Satya on board by saying "We can probably sell another 50 million consoles next gen!".. they did it with that BS "ONE BILLLLION GAMERS with XCloud!" crap.

I think cloud gaming is either incredibly far off, or will die a miserable death within a decade personally.
 

Neo Blaster

Member
Xbox has announced many AAA games

Halo Infinite - look at the munkee!!

Forza Motorsport - 2-3 years away

Fable - 2-3 years away

Avowed - 2-3 years away

State of Decay 3 - 2-3 years away

Senua's Saga: Hellblade II - 2-3 years away

Everwild - probably years away, not even Rare knows what the gameplay is going to be

Age of Empires 4 - PC game so far

Flight Simulator - PC game so far

Gears 6 (likely) - ? years away, they've just released 5

InXile's AAA game - they are making Wasteland 3 and Frostpoint VR, multiplats, do they have more teams?

The Initiative's AAA (AAAA!) game - 40-people studio that never released a game will make AAAA? Maybe for next next gen

Forza Horizon 5 (Likely) - unless there's a second team, Playground is focusing on Fable

Compulsion's next project (they are staffing up to 100+ people, so likely AAA or close) - bought very recently, 2-3 years away.

And who knows what Doublefine will be doing? - Psychonauts 2, multiplatform, do they have more teams?
 

IntentionalPun

Ask me about my wife's perfect butthole
I wonder how Satya feels about cloud gaming post stadia
I dunno.. on the one hand, someone else's failure could be your gain..

On the other, uhhh.. is there a market for this???

Obviously lots of reasons Stadia flopped other than necessarily "there is no market", but MAS at least have to be worried about Stadia suggesting that cloud gaming is a flop.

You never want to BANK your future on some massive market disruption occurring either way, you prepare for it and see what happens. Hopefully that's what MS has done despite being bullish on xCloud when they talk about it.
 
Last edited:

Darklor01

Might need to stop sniffing glue
Right.. that's my main concern I've brought up a bunch here.

That MS has sold their leadership on the future of Xbox by claiming xCloud will bring in millions and millions of customers.

They didn't get Satya on board by saying "We can probably sell another 50 million consoles next gen!".. they did it with that BS "ONE BILLLLION GAMERS with XCloud!" crap.

I think cloud gaming is either incredibly far off, or will die a miserable death within a decade personally.

Cloud everything is the future.Depending on the country, and regions within countries, the network infrastructures to support it vary greatly. The U.S. being the worst. 1st, high speed Internet is still not everywhere. Additionally, those with data caps really have a hard time supporting all digital consoles and downloading games purchased, let alone streaming services.... on top of streaming services and/as well as ones they already have.
 

bitbydeath

Member
Halo Infinite - look at the munkee!!

Forza Motorsport - 2-3 years away

Fable - 2-3 years away

Avowed - 2-3 years away

State of Decay 3 - 2-3 years away

Senua's Saga: Hellblade II - 2-3 years away

Everwild - probably years away, not even Rare knows what the gameplay is going to be

Age of Empires 4 - PC game so far

Flight Simulator - PC game so far

Gears 6 (likely) - ? years away, they've just released 5

InXile's AAA game - they are making Wasteland 3 and Frostpoint VR, multiplats, do they have more teams?

The Initiative's AAA (AAAA!) game - 40-people studio that never released a game will make AAAA? Maybe for next next gen

Forza Horizon 5 (Likely) - unless there's a second team, Playground is focusing on Fable

Compulsion's next project (they are staffing up to 100+ people, so likely AAA or close) - bought very recently, 2-3 years away.

And who knows what Doublefine will be doing? - Psychonauts 2, multiplatform, do they have more teams?

Someone on GAF leaked the first three years of Xbox One. Looks like Microsofts just getting ahead of the game.
 

HeisenbergFX4

Gold Member
Halo Infinite - look at the munkee!!

Forza Motorsport - 2-3 years away

Fable - 2-3 years away

Avowed - 2-3 years away

State of Decay 3 - 2-3 years away

Senua's Saga: Hellblade II - 2-3 years away

Everwild - probably years away, not even Rare knows what the gameplay is going to be

Age of Empires 4 - PC game so far

Flight Simulator - PC game so far

Gears 6 (likely) - ? years away, they've just released 5

InXile's AAA game - they are making Wasteland 3 and Frostpoint VR, multiplats, do they have more teams?

The Initiative's AAA (AAAA!) game - 40-people studio that never released a game will make AAAA? Maybe for next next gen

Forza Horizon 5 (Likely) - unless there's a second team, Playground is focusing on Fable

Compulsion's next project (they are staffing up to 100+ people, so likely AAA or close) - bought very recently, 2-3 years away.

And who knows what Doublefine will be doing? - Psychonauts 2, multiplatform, do they have more teams?

Xbox has another big one coming but I would imagine its a year out at least.
 

icerock

Member
Reality is finally dawning on many, no matter how much you want to champion one corporation as pro-consumer, at the end of the day, they are by very nature 'corporation'. Their only interest is getting your money, nothing is doing out of charity or morality.

Sony sell bazillions of hardware, and software, but their ultimate cash cow is PSN, mostly through PS+ subs. It's the exact same scenario for Xbox as well, they don't move as many hardware and software, but they do have a very large contingent hooked into their system through XBL Gold subscription especially in the light of fact that F2P MP games require it too. It just makes zero logical sense to lose all those billion of dollars for.... pro-consumer PR online?

Microsoft putting an end to selling 12-month XBL Gold membership, was seen by the hardcore as them pulling down the pay-wall altogether. I don't know if it's naivety or it's driven by plethora of MS affiliated influencers online playing into the gullibility of their fan base. Probably a mixture of both, but ultimately, what they have done is raise the price of XBL Gold membership, since you can't stack. In the end, it's all lining up to their goal of getting more people on GamePass. For those players who just play FortNite, Apex Legends, Warzone etc. either they can continue to buy 1 or 3 month XBL Gold membership at higher cost, or they can sub to Gamepass, which will in-turn have XBL Gold integrated for "free". I think, they'll hold out a little bit more before pulling down pay-wall on F2P MP games altogether. You ideally want your casual Fortnite, Warzone players to dip their feet into what GamePass is offering. But, all the noise around Halo F2P MP suggests it may be imminent.

However, it must be awkward for MS to know, that their most loyal consumers who buy their gateway hardware have to ultimately pay more to play online, while the PC user-base can avoid this scenario. It'll be interesting to know if MS remove the distinction between PC and Xbox GamePass in the future. Addition of XBL Gold for "free" to GamePass for Xbox users will probably help them navigate this awkward scenario. Nonetheless, I'm very curious to know how they handle this transition. It's in the making, there are many tricky scenarios, but that pay-wall to play online (except for F2P games) isn't going away.
 

IntentionalPun

Ask me about my wife's perfect butthole
Cloud everything is the future.Depending on the country, and regions within countries, the network infrastructures to support it vary greatly. The U.S. being the worst. 1st, high speed Internet is still not everywhere. Additionally, those with data caps really have a hard time supporting all digital consoles and downloading games purchased, let alone streaming services.... on top of streaming services and/as well as ones they already have.

Devices getting smaller, cheaper, more powerful is also the future.

Cloud gaming might have a future; hyperbole like "it is the future" is not something anyone can say for sure. There is no internet provided service ever imagined that is more demanding than cloud gaming is. How much that will effect it's ability to entice consumers, as well as actually make sense financially, has yet to be seen.

I definitely think it's way too early to really take off big.
 
Last edited:
Xbox has announced many AAA games:

Halo Infinite
Forza Motorsport
Fable
Avowed
State of Decay 3
Senua's Saga: Hellblade II
Everwild
Age of Empires 4
Flight Simulator

And then we have a ton of unannounced stuff:

Gears 6 (likely)
InXile's AAA game
The Initiative's AAA (AAAA!) game
Forza Horizon 5 (Likely)
Compulsion's next project (they are staffing up to 100+ people, so likely AAA or close)
And who knows what Doublefine will be doing?

Now some of that is GAAS and some of that is not. Games like Avowed, Fable, Hellblade II, the singleplayer portions of Halo and Gears, likely InXile's game, The Initiative's game, Compulsion's game and Doublefine's game (thought they could release a few AA games instead) won't be GAAS but instead singleplayer and story driven (the stuff Sony fans like).

Oh... and all that stuff will be on Game Pass. Xbox is gonna be amazing this gen, but it'll take some time to fight the current hardcore gaming narrative around here and other forums.

Wow have you ever considered to change your user name to Xboxevangelist? It would be better suited? :lollipop_beaming_smiling:

Just joking my friend
 

Darklor01

Might need to stop sniffing glue
Devices getting smaller, cheaper, more powerful is also the future.

Cloud gaming might have a future; hyperbole like "it is the future" is not something anyone can say for sure. There is no internet provided service ever imagined that is more demanding than cloud gaming is. How much that will effect it's ability to entice consumers, as well as actually make sense financially, has yet to be seen.

I definitely think it's way too early to really take off big.

I agree with you, I think. I will add, no matter how portable, powerful a device gets... if the ability to get reasonably priced service that can support the hardware Isn’t there, the hardware becomes irrelevant.

As for less expensive hardware. I think that varies. I mean, sure, VR is getting cheaper as are other devices in tech as they mature... but.. then you have something like Air Pods. They’re the successor to standard ear pods and pretty priceY, even against other wireless ear buds.
 
I honestly thought we would get it at the last Xbox show, maybe they plan on telling us in their next show later this month, holding back a couple of bullets yet.

If it is only roughly a year out that's at least promising. I do hope their next event will have some big games we can expect to see within the first year.
 
Last edited:

thelastword

Banned
Halo Infinite - look at the munkee!!

Forza Motorsport - 2-3 years away

Fable - 2-3 years away

Avowed - 2-3 years away

State of Decay 3 - 2-3 years away

Senua's Saga: Hellblade II - 2-3 years away

Everwild - probably years away, not even Rare knows what the gameplay is going to be

Age of Empires 4 - PC game so far

Flight Simulator - PC game so far

Gears 6 (likely) - ? years away, they've just released 5

InXile's AAA game - they are making Wasteland 3 and Frostpoint VR, multiplats, do they have more teams?

The Initiative's AAA (AAAA!) game - 40-people studio that never released a game will make AAAA? Maybe for next next gen

Forza Horizon 5 (Likely) - unless there's a second team, Playground is focusing on Fable

Compulsion's next project (they are staffing up to 100+ people, so likely AAA or close) - bought very recently, 2-3 years away.

And who knows what Doublefine will be doing? - Psychonauts 2, multiplatform, do they have more teams?
I don't get it, people said XBOX was the only team ready for next gen.......Especially when they were making all the studio acquisition announcements and hyping their portfolio.....They have a lot of games that won't be ready anytime soon, the games they have that runs in real-time are all cross-gen built for XBOX ONE and gamepass, yet people will assume the smaller studios can pump smaller/AA titles in a hurry, but people forget that it took a long time for these studios to release SOD, SOT, We Lucky Few etc...and even then, the quality of these games were not that great.......Even Flight Simulator is not coming to the console right now and from what I've seen of the PC version, there's alot of low rez textures and background details. It definitely does not look anything as good as the first trailer I saw of FS....
 
Thats the thing I was told there were 2 of those for their first show and for me personally I counted zero but what others consider huge and the games I like are different for everyone.

Because there wasn't gameplay or you're just not interested in stuff like Avowed, Fable, etc?

There were no mic drops for me either. I'm interested in alot of the games, but can't get hyped when they show basically nothing
 

Neo Blaster

Member
I don't get it, people said XBOX was the only team ready for next gen.......Especially when they were making all the studio acquisition announcements and hyping their portfolio.....They have a lot of games that won't be ready anytime soon, the games they have that runs in real-time are all cross-gen built for XBOX ONE and gamepass, yet people will assume the smaller studios can pump smaller/AA titles in a hurry, but people forget that it took a long time for these studios to release SOD, SOT, We Lucky Few etc...and even then, the quality of these games were not that great.......Even Flight Simulator is not coming to the console right now and from what I've seen of the PC version, there's alot of low rez textures and background details. It definitely does not look anything as good as the first trailer I saw of FS....
Yep, they had a lot of time to prepare but all we know so far is that their first next gen year is lacking on first party games. Unless they pull out a big surprise, they have to depend on timed exclusives, indies, enhanced BC and thirds.
 

thelastword

Banned
Yep, they had a lot of time to prepare but all we know so far is that their first next gen year is lacking on first party games. Unless they pull out a big surprise, they have to depend on timed exclusives, indies, enhanced BC and thirds.
MS bought most of these studios in 2018. You would think they would have something cooked already, as most of these studios are AA/Indie. Guerilla was able to put Killzone ShadowFall together in 8 Months...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom