I'm not sure you have an argument here or if you're just arguing for the sake of defending your original argument, but although you're not entirely wrong in that Tezuka was borrowing from Disney rendering white people, you're missing the point. This is something that's been brought up ad-naseum in response to you, but when you're rendering something, especially in a style, you're less likely to exaggerate features to make somebody appear a certain ethnicity unless you need to make it clear that they are that ethnicity. If everyone in your work is white and you have one Asian character, you're probably going to exaggerate their features to make them appear Asian. And vice versa. And again, when you stylize something you distill it down to its core features, and you only have so much to work with on a face.
And this is ignoring that the anime aesthetic has clearly evolved in a distinctly Japanese way, to the point where it's not really all that recognizable that it originally evolved from Western works. And this too, would be ignoring that it still doesn't mean anything that they were borrowing from Western art, else you might as well look at some of van Gogh's later works and say he looks Asian because he was borrowing stylistic attributes of Japanese ukiyo-e woodblock prints.
I wrote this up so I'm going to post it but:
Holy shit dude, Disney's early rendering of other ethnicities are racist as hell. If you think that's how people of different races should be represented, then I have no idea how you think this is okay.
