No idea, never bought anything at that size!Does 8tb require being plugged in at the wall too?
I remember when looking for higher than 4tb many many many years ago, everything higher than 4 needed to be plugged in & were quite big.
Also upgrading from my 1tb card to the 2tb card was quite depressing, £375 (only £75 away from another series X)
They were thinking we'll sell them £375 expansion cards and make a shitload of money. Let's just get them to buy the console first.Alright I am late to the party, but I'm rocking a gaming rig and a one x, and thought about upgrading to play my console games better.
I don't give a crap about 4k and all that graphic whoring. Just want a console that is a bit future proof - which series s isn't.
I don't even care about a disc drive which made series s a decent choice, until I noticed the systems true bottleneck - the disc.
Because who the hell thought that a digital only system should have 364 GB available storage for games, in a time where these games are around 100 gigs these days, and it's probably going to get worse throughout the generation.
A series x costs 530 euro in my country, and since I already have a gaming rig I wouldn't mind the little brother s, which could run the games I for some reason don't play on my pc.
The series s costs 320 euro, which is more affordable, but if you want to upgrade the crippled storage, which I know I would, given I like to have a lot of games installed (which I already have on my 864 GB one x), it just doesn't seems possible on the series s.
Now, we can thankfully upgrade the storage, but that costs 240 euro, which end up being the same price as the one x anyway.
What the hell were Microsoft thinking with this storage nonsense.
The system is not crippled by its weaker graphics, its crippled because you have almost no hard drive space.
This is not that a big deal. Buy a cheap USB disc to move games back and forth if you find yourself playing more than 3 games at a time.Alright I am late to the party, but I'm rocking a gaming rig and a one x, and thought about upgrading to play my console games better.
I don't give a crap about 4k and all that graphic whoring. Just want a console that is a bit future proof - which series s isn't.
I don't even care about a disc drive which made series s a decent choice, until I noticed the systems true bottleneck - the disc.
Because who the hell thought that a digital only system should have 364 GB available storage for games, in a time where these games are around 100 gigs these days, and it's probably going to get worse throughout the generation.
A series x costs 530 euro in my country, and since I already have a gaming rig I wouldn't mind the little brother s, which could run the games I for some reason don't play on my pc.
The series s costs 320 euro, which is more affordable, but if you want to upgrade the crippled storage, which I know I would, given I like to have a lot of games installed (which I already have on my 864 GB one x), it just doesn't seems possible on the series s.
Now, we can thankfully upgrade the storage, but that costs 240 euro, which end up being the same price as the one x anyway.
What the hell were Microsoft thinking with this storage nonsense.
The system is not crippled by its weaker graphics, its crippled because you have almost no hard drive space.
It's your fault for buying this piece of crap half next gen trash console.
About 6 months ago I was told that someone calling the Series S a ‘retard console’ was me reporting someone for having a differing opinionAmazed how people get away with this compared to what others get banned for.
If you are shopping in the 299 range, money is probably an important decision maker. If it wasn't he would just bought the Series X.I disagree with OP with the console being bad. For the price, it's really good. There had to be compromises.
But for everyone saying it's the best deal for the price... yeah, no. I understand console shortages are a big thing, but for $100 more, spec-wise, a PS5 Digital Edition is a much better deal. Of course there's no game pass there, so.
That's not true. It runs at 1440p with enhanced texture filtering. Only Xbox One games are as-is, unless it's FPS Boosted/AutoHDR.Another thing is, having a one x already, it's a mixed bag.
It even runs 360 games in one s mode and not enhanced.
That's not true. It runs at 1440p with enhanced texture filtering. Only Xbox One games are as-is, unless it's FPS Boosted/AutoHDR.
Theres plenty of consoles in my country. You can easily get any of them if you want.I didn't know storage was that low. Yikes! I run into storage issues on my XSX. Yeah, you're better off getting an XSX...if you can find one.
Series X consoles? What country?Xbox Series S Will Not Run Xbox One X Enhanced Versions Of Backwards Compatible Games
If you were expecting to play Xbox One X Enhanced backwards compatible games on the Series S, think again...www.gfinityesports.com
Theres plenty of consoles in my country. You can easily get any of them if you want.
The Series S runs all OG Xbox games at native 1440p and the One X enhanced 360 games play with their enhancements at native 1440p instead of 4k.Xbox Series S Will Not Run Xbox One X Enhanced Versions Of Backwards Compatible Games
If you were expecting to play Xbox One X Enhanced backwards compatible games on the Series S, think again...www.gfinityesports.com
Theres plenty of consoles in my country. You can easily get any of them if you want.
I live in Denmark, scandinaviaSeries X consoles? What country?
So it runs them as good as one x? Just 1440p instead of 4k?The Series S runs all OG Xbox games at native 1440p and the One X enhanced 360 games play with their enhancements at native 1440p instead of 4k.
This is how Xbox Series S backwards compatibility really works
UPDATE: For the authoritative take on Microsoft's new flagship console, Digital Foundry's full Xbox Series X review is …www.eurogamer.net
Correct.I live in Denmark, scandinavia
So it runs them as good as one x? Just 1440p instead of 4k?
That's Xbox One games. Not 360 games. 360 games run at 1440p rather than 4K that the One X does.Xbox Series S Will Not Run Xbox One X Enhanced Versions Of Backwards Compatible Games
If you were expecting to play Xbox One X Enhanced backwards compatible games on the Series S, think again...www.gfinityesports.com
Theres plenty of consoles in my country. You can easily get any of them if you want.
Correct.
But Xbox One enhanced games that are X enhanced aren’t available on Series S, it just plays them in the One S profile.
So xbox one x enhanced xbox one games aren't supported by series, but enhanced 360 games does?That's Xbox One games. Not 360 games. 360 games run at 1440p rather than 4K that the One X does.
I have the 1TB card, and a 8TB and 5TB drive installed. 3TB free and I have about 500 games installed.
If you are shopping in the 299 range, money is probably an important decision maker. If it wasn't he would just bought the Series X.
One could argue for $100 more than a PS5 DE you could get the Series X and you now also have UHD BR player more storage and better performance, but that's not his budget is it?
Because One games enhanced for One X leverage extra RAM the Series S doesn’t have. 360 games don’t have that issue.So xbox one x enhanced xbox one games aren't supported by series, but enhanced 360 games does?
So enhanced xbox one, one x games enhanced, doesn't work on Series S.Because One games enhanced for One X leverage extra RAM the Series S doesn’t have. 360 games don’t have that issue.
YesSo enhanced xbox one, one x games enhanced, doesn't work on Series S.
But enhanced xbox 360 games works on Series S.
Amazed how people get away with this compared to what others get banned for.
Still feels weird that my one x can do things the series s can't.
I do not want to throw wood into a fire but people buy macbooks with only 250gigs of storage and it is premium device...OMG, a budget console for casual users that's 40% cheaper has less storage!
The console is fine for what it's trying to do, which is offer an affordable way for people to keep playing current games. I'd never buy it, but I'm not going to complain about it because I'm not the target audience.
P.S. If the storage is too small and adding a cheap SSD to store and transfer games is beneath you, you are also not the target audience.
OMG, a budget console for casual users that's 40% cheaper has less storage!
The console is fine for what it's trying to do, which is offer an affordable way for people to keep playing current games. I'd never buy it, but I'm not going to complain about it because I'm not the target audience.
P.S. If the storage is too small and adding a cheap SSD to store and transfer games is beneath you, you are also not the target audience.
Storage, as its name implies, is for STORING games, not necessarily playing them.I have the same issues with my xbox one S. 1tb isnt even enough, if you are an xbox user with gamepass, you will need 5tb of storages. MS needs to make that storage cheaper, or make a cheaper storage.
just remember, Valve thought it was OK to put 64gb in the steam deck base model. It can always be worse.Alright I am late to the party, but I'm rocking a gaming rig and a one x, and thought about upgrading to play my console games better.
I don't give a crap about 4k and all that graphic whoring. Just want a console that is a bit future proof - which series s isn't.
I don't even care about a disc drive which made series s a decent choice, until I noticed the systems true bottleneck - the disc.
Because who the hell thought that a digital only system should have 364 GB available storage for games, in a time where these games are around 100 gigs these days, and it's probably going to get worse throughout the generation.
A series x costs 530 euro in my country, and since I already have a gaming rig I wouldn't mind the little brother s, which could run the games I for some reason don't play on my pc.
The series s costs 320 euro, which is more affordable, but if you want to upgrade the crippled storage, which I know I would, given I like to have a lot of games installed (which I already have on my 864 GB one x), it just doesn't seems possible on the series s.
Now, we can thankfully upgrade the storage, but that costs 240 euro, which end up being the same price as the one x anyway.
What the hell were Microsoft thinking with this storage nonsense.
The system is not crippled by its weaker graphics, its crippled because you have almost no hard drive space.
Edit -
Another thing is, having a one x already, it's a mixed bag.
It even runs 360 games in one s mode and not enhanced.
Weird shit to want more SSD space? Please tell me how they will be able to save more games on the tiny SSD provided? What will the cost amount to if and when they need to buy an extra 1TB of SSD for their series S?Man, this is some weird shit.
If they wanted to spend more money and take a bit more loss, the place to upgrade would be the VRAM, and possibly some extra GPU CUs.
Why would anyone with brains go above 512GB SSD for the cheap, entry level console?
love how you're lowballing it by specifically mentioning cod vanguard and not warzone which is 100+ gb for multiplayerLet's say you play cod vanguard for multiplayer, that's easily 62 GB.
£249 for the console with 360GB storage, plus £200 for 1TB proprietary SSD.Yeah the storage capacity is pathetic. Not sure how else they would hit that 299 price.
Well Warzone would make it worse for series s, right? Its not like I'm talking positively about it.love how you're lowballing it by specifically mentioning cod vanguard and not warzone which is 100+ gb for multiplayer
although, you could go to gamepass and get halo infinite which is 40+gb for multiplayer
just remember, Valve thought it was OK to put 64gb in the steam deck base model. It can always be worse.
I do agree with you though, that is BS
the 512gb model costs more than the XSS + SSD expansion (especially when you consider the fact that getting 512gb storage for the Xbox currently is 129 bucks)I get what you are saying about Steam Deck, but you can add 512GB of expansion to Steam Deck for less than half of what it costs to do the same on XSS. Of course, Steam Deck just needs microSD rather than SSD so it isn't really a good comparison either way.
Weird shit to want more SSD space? Please tell me how they will be able to save more games on the tiny SSD provided? What will the cost amount to if and when they need to buy an extra 1TB of SSD for their series S?