LOL.
What’s fairly obvious is that a huge number of people love to dog-pile on anything Ubisoft. You see it in every thread - people nitpicking over the silliest things, not because they actually care, but because they have an excuse to shit all over Ubisoft for the umpteenth time.
Sure, some people love Prince of Persia... but you’re being awfully naive if you believe this thread is filled with Prince of Persia enthusiasts.
It's not. Stop making fool of yourself. Seriously.One and the same buddy. That's the 'theme' or the art direction, the 'theme' of the story is something different and the 'theme' of the combat different again. A good games themes would intersect.
Keep trying though.
How is the difference between the contrast of tiles on a ps2 game compared with the contrast a of tiles of a ps4 game core to art direction?
Is Prince of Persia 2008's cel shading the theme or the art direction? Answer is easy, stop being silly kuncol02, seriously you're misinforming people.
LOL.
What’s fairly obvious is that a huge number of people love to dog-pile on anything Ubisoft. You see it in every thread - people nitpicking over the silliest things, not because they actually care, but because they have an excuse to shit all over Ubisoft for the umpteenth time.
Sure, some people love Prince of Persia... but you’re being awfully naive if you believe this thread is filled with Prince of Persia enthusiasts.
They are both realistic ww2 shooters and surprise surprise, they look extremely similar because thier themselves are identical.It's not. Stop making fool of yourself. Seriously.
You can have games with same theme but different art direction or vice versa. Look for WW2 CoD and Battlefield how they have same theme but are unmistakable different.
We played that gameplay 20 years ago in pop sot and can pop that stuff any time.Well this definitely weeds out those who claim gameplay is more important than graphics.
Personally I think the graphics are fine.
Definitely not the best but functional and not really that bad.
Angry much ?
Someone literally posted the comparison right above your comment.
The art direction is clearly intact, that is objectively true.
Your comments about lighting are relevant to how bad it looks now how the art direction has been betrayed, u seem confuse on that one.
As u can see from my original comments I think the game looks like shit and as a fan I wont be buying it as it doesn't hit the standard set by other similar remakes in the last few years.
But saying the art direction is fucked is just dumb dumb talk. Graphics and art direction are not the same, go look at Ghost of Tsushima for a recent example. Also get off your high horse.
I live in Reno, Vicky. I've been PC gaming since the '80's. The game has a cozy feel. I think it looks great, what's the problem?He shat on Naught Dog art direction and use of colours, when they always made a huge deal out of having employees working on colour palettes only and the importance of it, to defend this scam while claiming it looks great and hoping for them to not change the, non-existent, art in it.. color me surprised if he isn‘t.
That's easy. Postal. It's really god for what it is.
I’m shocked this must be the first time in history outsourcing work to India yielded diminishing returns.