• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Twitter removed as sharing option on Xbox (API costs $42,000 a month now)

Elog

Member
Twitter was profitable just before COVID hit. The reduced marketing/ad spend during the COVID years had a very large negative financial impact on them.

Elon is taking the complete piss at the moment - hard to understand what he is trying to achieve and why. It seems mostly as if servicing all that debt he used to acquire Twitter is putting everything in a negative spiral where short term cash inflow is prioritized even if it ends up hurting the platform longer term.
 
Last edited:

Unknown?

Member
It's social media platform which companies use to connect with their audience.

Old Twitter was good, because they had a function that was working for them.

Elon come in and messed up everything. From charging users to a monthly sub, minimizing your recommendations, and worse.

Companies aren't happy with his recent moves.
Yeah, old twitter, with their manipulative algorithms and shadow banning. So good! The one thing I will commend Elon Musk on is he open sourced that shit. Closed source = cess pit.
 

Sho_Gunn

Banned
Pardon my ignorance but why does a console need Twitter?
I would think Twitter stands to benefit more from this than Sony, Microsoft, or Nintendo.
You are correct. Twitter is slowly killing itself with the amount of companies dropping advertisements and now this.

I think I saw somewhere that Twitter was never really profitable or it made little of it. Correct me if I'm wrong. Regardless, Twitter is a huge platform and companies like Microsoft and Sony use it to great marketing effect. Asking them to pay for that privilege is fair in my opinion.
If a megacorp wants to make a stand for whatever reason against Twitter/Musk, they should migrate to another Twitter-like service. Mastodon was it? Let's see how that turns out for them.
found the person paying for Twitter blue

I agree but at least it isn't a government agency any more.
LOL..Twitter is currently at is worst but at least there is so called "Freedom of speech" now
 
Last edited:

quest

Not Banned from OT
There's nothing insane about a for-profit entity wanting another for-profit entity to pay for the services they consume, especially services that cost money to maintain. $42k per month isn't insane for companies like Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo. Making billions in net profits per year but complaining that some other company wants $500K to shoulder the cost of the platform you push content to is what's insane.

Its a couple hundred thousand a month for large enterprise like Microsoft. Twitter needs content to keep people engaged. Twitter benefits as much as sony and Microsoft from the content.

 

Elog

Member
Yeah, old twitter, with their manipulative algorithms and shadow banning. So good! The one thing I will commend Elon Musk on is he open sourced that shit. Closed source = cess pit.
That it has become open source is great. Twitter is much much worse now though since those that actually are trying to manipulate us can do it without checks and balances. It is absolutely atrocious at the moment. Authoritarian foreign interests (primarily Russia and China) are having a field day.
 

Astray

Gold Member
I am not following the drama closely but....isnt this fee a very small for such services? Does everyone want everything for free? Does FB not charge anything for their API?
Pricing is very high for what Twitter offers in terms of reach.

Not sure if it's worth losing a feature though.
 

ReBurn

Gold Member
It's social media platform which companies use to connect with their audience.

Old Twitter was good, because they had a function that was working for them.

Elon come in and messed up everything. From charging users to a monthly sub, minimizing your recommendations, and worse.

Companies aren't happy with his recent moves.
I'm not sure I would say that Twitter was ever good but people like it so who am I to judge?

Elon has just accelerated what was going to happen to Twitter anyway. They were either going to have to go the route of google and Facebook and become large scale sellers of creepy information about people or they were going to have to start charging for their services. The days of for-profit startups building their companies on the back of free Twitter services was going to end eventually.

Twitter should allow the API functionality to work for users who pay for Twitter Blue for companies that don't want to pay for access on behalf of their customers. That would be a good middle ground.
 

Dr. Claus

Vincit qui se vincit
I'm not sure I would say that Twitter was ever good but people like it so who am I to judge?
People also like to smoke pot, drink bleach, and watch Twilight. People are retarded.

Elon has just accelerated what was going to happen to Twitter anyway. They were either going to have to go the route of google and Facebook and become large scale sellers of creepy information about people or they were going to have to start charging for their services. The days of for-profit startups building their companies on the back of free Twitter services was going to end eventually.

Twitter should allow the API functionality to work for users who pay for Twitter Blue for companies that don't want to pay for access on behalf of their customers. That would be a good middle ground.

Let's be honest. Twitter, along with most social media, should shut down. TikTok, Twitter, Tumblr - shut it all down. We would be better off.
 

feynoob

Banned
Yeah, old twitter, with their manipulative algorithms and shadow banning. So good! The one thing I will commend Elon Musk on is he open sourced that shit. Closed source = cess pit.
Elon's musk new subscription fucked up a lot of companies, due to the verification impersonation during that process, with some losing alot of money from their stock.

Also, check recommendation process for the new Twitter. It's p2view.
 

ReBurn

Gold Member
Its a couple hundred thousand a month for large enterprise like Microsoft. Twitter needs content to keep people engaged. Twitter benefits as much as sony and Microsoft from the content.

If companies like Microsoft were the only way content reached Twitter I would agree with you. But Twitter gets lots of content from tens of millions of users for free every day. There's a benefit to Microsoft to able to offer Xbox users a way to share content outside of their network as well. If they can integrate with gamers' socials it's an incentive for people to buy into their platform. $2.5 million per year sounds reasonable for a company the size of Microsoft.

The caveat should be that Twitter should allow Twitter Blue subscribers to use Twitter API services through third party devices like Xbox. Then customers are essentially paying to enable what Microsoft doesn't want to pay for.
 

ReBurn

Gold Member
People also like to smoke pot, drink bleach, and watch Twilight. People are retarded.



Let's be honest. Twitter, along with most social media, should shut down. TikTok, Twitter, Tumblr - shut it all down. We would be better off.
I don't know that we would be better off in every way, but we would in some. These platforms can be useful. They're generally not used in beneficial ways. People have always been stupid. These platforms make that more visible
 

Black_Stride

do not tempt fate do not contrain Wonder Woman's thighs do not do not
Twitter is a very large platform. Console maker creates a game, someone using a console shares screenshot of that game on twitter, "free advertisement".
Ive searched the XboxShare hashtag multiple multiple times when looking for good Gears of War MP footage.......that shit aint worth price of admission even if it was "free advertising".
People are acting like all these people who use XboxShare have millions or even thousands of followers.......most of the people who use(d) XboxShare are literal nobodies, their screenshots and videos have near 0 engagement.....its not free advertising because no one is seeing it.

MS can use that few million dollars to bolster their own social media presence and it would be worth more.
The whole feature was more a goodwill thing than any sort of oh hey people are gonna search the XboxShare hashtag and we are gonna be advertising our platform.

Hell ive seen more engagement for people screenshots on the dashboard clubs.
 

MarkMe2525

Member
They don't need the large package for xbox.
You very well may be right, but where are you getting your info?

Edit: So I'm going to assume, since you haven't answered while still being active today on gaf, that you just made that up. Or maybe, I'm on your ignore list 🤣
 
Last edited:

Ozriel

M$FT
I think I saw somewhere that Twitter was never really profitable or it made little of it. Correct me if I'm wrong. Regardless, Twitter is a huge platform and companies like Microsoft and Sony use it to great marketing effect. Asking them to pay for that privilege is fair in my opinion.
If a megacorp wants to make a stand for whatever reason against Twitter/Musk, they should migrate to another Twitter-like service. Mastodon was it? Let's see how that turns out for them.

You realize many of these big companies were already paying to advertise on Twitter?
 

Power Pro

Member
Nintendo shouldn't have dropped Miiverse. They probably thought "oh, we don't need our own thing, we can just have people post to Twitter" Now that Twitter is going to shit, doesn't seem like a great idea to throw away what they had on Wii U and 3DS.
 

Ansphn

Member
The end of Twitter is near. Soon Twitter will be mostly bot ads and scams, Russian propaganda, porn and random shit scattered throughout.
 
Last edited:

OCASM

Banned

Raven77

Member
Probably more an issue of the principles of it. Twitter is built on the back of the content its users create, content facilitated by things like the game console integration to the platform. Now they want to benefit from the uploaded content while also charging fees for this access. If the console makers wanted to leverage data from Twitter, the fee makes more sense. But just for facilitating posts and media uploads it seems silly.

Like every content sharing platform on the planet? You guys need to realize the API is going to cost money because it costs Twitter money.

Virtue signaling companies will virtue signal...

Guess they hate that Twitter isn't ultra one sided now.
 

Kerotan

Member
Wonder if it will be removed from Nintendo Switch aswell, it's pretty much the only reason I still have a Twitter account so I could easily upload some screen grabs.
Nintendo need a PS app that uploads all you your screens and vids to it.
 
This is pennies for those companies, but IF they remove the functionality that will be a power move.

It’s like they're saying that they don't need Twitter for their business.
 

Belthazar

Member
Imagine paying half a million dollars (the starting price for small companies, I imagine it would be a lot more to MS) to generate traffic to twitter. Elon is really driving twitter to the ground, isn't he?
 

Ronin_7

Banned
Imagine paying half a million dollars (the starting price for small companies, I imagine it would be a lot more to MS) to generate traffic to twitter. Elon is really driving twitter to the ground, isn't he?
Wonder how much Sony is paying lol
 

Rentahamster

Rodent Whores
Alternatively: companies need to pay a platform for the functionality and service they use.
Traditionally, the arrangement is supposed to be that you "pay" for the social media service, not with your own money, but with your private data and your attention span, which the social media company can then monetize via targeted advertising and other related activities.
 

Black_Stride

do not tempt fate do not contrain Wonder Woman's thighs do not do not
Like every content sharing platform on the planet? You guys need to realize the API is going to cost money because it costs Twitter money.

Virtue signaling companies will virtue signal...

Guess they hate that Twitter isn't ultra one sided now.
shocked-dog.gif

Thats your take away from this.....virtue signaling?
I dont think that means what you think it means my friend.


P.S The XboxApp can still share your DVR moments to twitter, its not like Microsoft is boycotting Twitter or something.
They will likely work around paying twitter by using Edge soon enough anyway.
 

DaGwaphics

Member
Like every content sharing platform on the planet? You guys need to realize the API is going to cost money because it costs Twitter money.

Virtue signaling companies will virtue signal...

Guess they hate that Twitter isn't ultra one sided now.

Free API access is available for all kinds of things, not sure what you are on about there.

API events that upload data to the social media platform really shouldn't have a charge. API events that make use of data from the social media platform I can see having a charge.

Twitter should want as much data uploaded to the platform as possible as that is what they monetize. If the consoles are pulling data from Twitter feeds that's one thing, if they are only making it easier for individual users to upload content, that's another.
 
Last edited:

X-Wing

Member
shocked-dog.gif

Thats your take away from this.....virtue signaling?
I dont think that means what you think it means my friend.


P.S The XboxApp can still share your DVR moments to twitter, its not like Microsoft is boycotting Twitter or something.
They will likely work around paying twitter by using Edge soon enough anyway.

When you walk around with a hammer in your hand everything looks like a nail or something.
 

EviLore

Expansive Ellipses
Staff Member
It's not out of the ordinary at all for companies to charge for commercial API access. However, social media platforms typically do not charge for API access involving posting to their platform, since obviously a low friction environment is vital for social media.

The more companies and users refuse to pay up and go elsewhere, the less value Twitter has.
 
Top Bottom