- Jul 26, 2021
I want a simple SF like II Turbo without 500 Hit Combos and Super, Duper, Ultra, Mega Moves.
Capcom Board of Directors
"We making a ton of money with costumes we need to double Chunli costume output"
"Let's make a 2D game we can't have costumes as it's 2D"
"Sounds line a great idea let's do that'
Im only suggesting what would make the game look better.
Costumes on ugly clay fighter looking characters or actual good 2D looking fighter game. I know which I would choose.…
Some parts of SFV story already are after SF3. Seems SF6 is going to happen mainly after SF3 but will feature time travelling to rewrite stuff from the past. I think they will use this excuse to both continue the events after SF3 and to reboot -at least the early chapters of the SF canon-.
As I remember the leaked document (written in early 2020) mentioned Oct-Dec 2022 release for PS4, PS5, XBO, Xbox Series and PC. It's fair to assume that as usually happens will get delayed, specially now with Covid and with the huge hacker attack they suffered, which included SF6 related documents and mails.
They also target PS4 and XBO because over 2/3 of the PS and Xbox fanbase still will be in the previous generation at the moment of its release and because this type of games can be easily scaled back or up.
Lol at the SF4 love blinders going on in this thread. People didnt like that game when it came out almost just as much as SF5, and even the pros dont look back at it fondly these days. It was successful cause it resurrected the FCG community and sold based on SF2 nostalgia.
SF3 also suffered the same fate with the love blinders, but at least it had the backing of the pros even when the general public didnt gel with it at the time.
Anyway, SF5 is far from their best entry, but its definitely a good entry in the series with easily the best roster.
SF6 really needs to pull ahead of the SF3 timeline once and for all. I know Luke will be back, and after seeing the directors tweets, we're really heading into Neo Shadaloo/G territory it seems.
I really hate to just have one use to that bar with a super move or uses it as an ex move. To me it makes the game more accessible while maintaining all the complexity of the game. Something like easy to enter, hard to master like situation.
A- too soon
B- future of fighting games dont look good with all the dlc and passes
Still kind of wonder why they haven't gone back to that idea for a SF game. I guess for some characters the V-System is meant to emulate the idea; Akuma can do Raging Demon when in V-Trigger for example.
Remember the days of mvc 2 where you get a huge roster from the get go...
Imagine mvc 2 released today
the xmen season pack
the avengers season pack
the resident evil pack
120Hz would be an issue for fighting games because they are very focused on latency and that latency already is an issue with 60Hz for when playing online because you need to send a lot of data as fast as possible and to have as much time as possible to receive, process and rectify info got from th other player. With 120 they would have double of data to send and synchronize so more time and rollback trickery would be needed and would be more noticiable the difference of playing online vs offline. And frame data is already too complex and difficult to learn and master at 60Hz, it would be even more difficult at 120Hz.Well, that is kind of disappointing. Sure there are visual aspects of the game that could be scaled up or down for the hardware but it effectively rules out designing game mechanics to take advantage of, say, 120 Hz display options. Attack frame data built around 120 Hz in ways that could add more depth to the moves, that is kind of the stuff you're not going to get by also natively supporting last-gen hardware.
Almost 6 years after launch SFV keeps consistently selling 200K-300K every quarter, and since they keep releasing new DLC I assume it's because people continue buying it. I'd say the main reason behind these long legs is is -in addition to frequent update with fixes, tweaks, additions and improvements- the support and visibility the game got via eSports: fans of the genre got interested over time on the game and bought it.Truth is only the casual players will play this or any 9th-gen fighter on PS4 and XBO and they aren't going to care for the competitive side of things, so there's no reason for Capcom to push native ports to those systems. For Xbox this is easy enough since they have now rolled out xCloud streaming to XBO so players there can simply play it via streaming and it would be good enough for them. PlayStation however doesn't have a similar service set up yet for PS4 to stream PS5 games via cloud, but it would be very good if they do so.
They make it crossgen because they know the big majority of their userbase will continue in the previous gen. It wouldn't be a good business for them to keep it next gen only. There aren't game design constraints for Street Fighter-like games, next gen only offers better visuals and shorter loading times plus minor things. Other than that, if it would be a PS5 full exclusive (which won't) then they also would take advantage of a better lowest common denominator wifi (but players still could play very distant of their router, to have a shitty router, a shitty internet connection or to play online while other device in the same wifi is streaming Netflix).That way burden is taken off the dev teams to make additional native builds for older systems, redirecting those would-be resources to the current-gen native options, frees up game design constraints, and players on the older platforms (who are going to be the more casual by default) won't perceive a difference playing the games via the cloud vs. native (plus, Sony & Microsoft get additional sub revenue from those players, for example xCloud streaming being a part of GPU (they may provide it separately later tho)).
Yes, as I mentioned before it happened with every single SF since SF2' Champion Edition. Many people complains about the most recent SF saying it's crap and that the previous one was great and way better. Until they release the next one. Then they switch to say the newest one is crap and the previous one, that they kept saying it was so bad then they switch to say it was very good.Actually I've seen quite a few pros favor SFIV over V
Tekken 7 pretty likely will outsell soon Tekken 3 as the best selling game in the series. MKX and MK11 are the best selling ones in the series. They both are the only ones who performed decently in sales during the dark pre-SFIV period, but also got highly boosted with the SFIV revival.Okay so entries at tournaments was probably lower pre-SF4 but there were still a lot of tournaments and certain franchises like Virtua Fighter saw the height of their tournament entries during that "dark ages" period. Other series like Tekken saw some of their best entries in that period too (Tekken 5, Dark Resurrection), IP like KOF, Guilty Gear flourished and Mortal Kombat had a comeback during that time too. DOA was doing well, etc.
They said that because sales were really bad for most games in the genre during that period (this includes MvC2 and CvS2), which caused to have way less new big games in the genre.Basically when people say "fighting games were dead" during then they really mean anything Capcom-related because outside of MvC2 and CvS2 they did practically nothing until SF4.
Yes, the FGC kept playing the games during the dark period even if it was a way smaller niche than before. The SFIV boom -supported by its eSports- caused the FGC to grow to the point now is bigger than ever.But that doesn't mean the genre was dead during that time or the FGC died, either. That said tho yeah SF4 did help breath some new life and attention to the genre and scene, not taking that away from it.
I think 3S is probably the pinnacle of fighting games, the most polished one. In terms of OST I prefer the SF2 or SFEX1 style and obviously SF2 WW was the most influential and iconic, but I think 3S is my favorite one in terms of gameplay.Well the Japanese pros dug SF3 for sure, not so much Western ones tho. IMO I think 3S in particular is kind of overrated; parry spam is real and the game doesn't have very good balance among the cast. Also the OST as a whole and the background art are weaker than 2I (but I do really like some tunes and backgrounds in 3S). Still tho it got a lot of things right.
Nah, they never cared about changing or retconning what needed to fit what they wanted in the games. They even resurrected at least three guys, and one of them multiple times. SFV storyline canon happens just before and just after SF3, and seems SF6 will happen just after SFV, which means very shortly after SF3. They could make a 65 years old Chun to look like as if she was 30. I think they will simply avoid mentioning their age.Agreed that story-wise they need to move past 3/3S by now. Capcom's probably scared it will mean needing to retire a lot of the SF2 old guard. I mean, they probably would, but they could do it the right way this time versus how they tried with SF3. Make Ryu, Ken, Chun-Li etc. grandpa/grandma age (or at least into their early/mid '60s) and looking older but all of them have lineage that can take their place. That little orphan girl with Chun in V and 3S for example, just age her to a young adult and make her the new Chun-Li, have Chun-Li be her mentor. Mel can basically become the new Ken, etc.
I think they won't remove the most popular characters, like the SF2 ones. Maybe not at launch, but they will be included in the game. They did a great job in SFV redesigning gameplay wise many characters to make them more unique and differentiated from the other characters, and at the same time they included disciples of old characters that offered new interesting stuff and were different enough. I think they will continue doing this in SF6They can even have those older SF2 etc. characters in as playable, but make it clear it's a passing of the torch going forward. Plus if they move it past 3S storyline-wise they can actually have the old guard develop new tech in a way that makes sense canonically and their protege basically using that new tech in their own developing style.
The future of fighting game looks better than ever: most franchises are selling more than they ever had and the DLC and passes system allows you to don't split the userbase into different game updates while to continue playing spending less money. Specially in SFV where all gameplay related updates and changes or game modes are free for everyone and you were able to unlock by playing a few hours at dumb difficulty like half of the DLC cast.B- future of fighting games dont look good with all the dlc and passes
I'd do that, to reuse characters from SFV, SFIV, SFxT and some guest from UMvC3. Just tweak a bit their gameplay and animations, upgrade a bit their 3D models and textures and use shaders to give it a slightly different look (I'd try to go the ARC Sys route and try achieve an art style somewhat similar to SF3 and SF Alpha).Would you prefer Capcom just bring the roster of Street Fighter V back reusing the same character models and just add an additional 25 characters on top. After all MvC2 was just a asset reuse with a few new sprites.
Seeing Sony having supported SFV eSports and even ended buying EVO, I assume that if Sony didn't sign an exclusive (seems to be multiplaform and crossgen according to the leak) they would have signed a marketing deal instead.So next week we have Luke demonstration and I assume he will release shortly after the demonstration in that week of week after.
Its definitely between Game Awards and Capcom Cup Finals in March when we see Street Fighter VI.
Seeing Sony having supported SFV eSports and even ended buying EVO, I assume that if Sony didn't sign an exclusive (seems to be multiplaform and crossgen according to the leak) they would have signed a marketing deal instead.
If it's the case, I think it means Sony will handle big/main announcements and pretty likely will do it using their channels: big game reveal at SFV EVO finals or at PlayStation Experience(if they finally have it)/big State of Play/PlayStation Showcase. Which is compatible with stuff handled by Capcom, like a teaser for Capcom Cup finals previous to a full reveal/exclusive? beta announcement at EVO finals.
They can make some small teaser in February/March and then a proper big reveal at EVO.I can see it being in a February State of Play and a more footage in March Capcom Cup. Evo is too late if they are aiming for February 2023 reveal.
120Hz would be an issue for fighting games because they are very focused on latency and that latency already is an issue with 60Hz for when playing online because you need to send a lot of data as fast as possible and to have as much time as possible to receive, process and rectify info got from th other player. With 120 they would have double of data to send and synchronize so more time and rollback trickery would be needed and would be more noticiable the difference of playing online vs offline. And frame data is already too complex and difficult to learn and master at 60Hz, it would be even more difficult at 120Hz.
I think it would be a better idea to keep it at 60Hz and focus that extra horsepower instead on getting native 4K @ steady 60fps with great visuals and a very low input lag.
Almost 6 years after launch SFV keeps consistently selling 200K-300K every quarter, and since they keep releasing new DLC I assume it's because people continue buying it. I'd say the main reason behind these long legs is is -in addition to frequent update with fixes, tweaks, additions and improvements- the support and visibility the game got via eSports: fans of the genre got interested over time on the game and bought it.
In the competitive side, Street Fighter always has been one of the biggest if not the biggest franchise of traditional fighting games. SFV got a bit of rejection at launch because it had some issues, but as they kept fixing and improving it their competitive side became stronger. Until covid happened, obviously. Capcom said they learnt from the SFV launch and don't want to repeat their mistakes in SF6, so pretty sure it will offer a more complete, polished package with proper online at launch, which combined with a multiplatform crossgen launch very likely will outsell SFV as the most successful Capcom fighting game home version SKU ever.
Casuals are those who buy a game, play it a few hours spread maybe over a week or two, and leave it forever or at least for some months or years. SFV players seem to be fans invested on the game who play it for years and are interested on its eSports, so even if as players they aren't so good they follow the game and have some knowledge about it.
Regarding PS5 on PS Now, Sony said they will include PS5 games on PS Now. But as happens with PC ports, they only put some of their exclusives on their game subscriptions instead of all, an they typically put them there once they completed their sales cycle after at least a couple of years or so. So obviously it's too soon to see PS5 games on PS Now because PS5 was released only 1 year ago. And as happens in Gamepass it's very rare to see there new AAA multiplatform games day one. And even if it would be the case, streaming isn't an Xbox feature: it's a Game Pass Ultimate feature and a limited number of their userbase have it, I assume an even smaller userbase use the streaming and it doesn't feature all games.
And well, input lag is key for fighting games. Streaming has atrocious input lag for this genre so fighting game fans would reject any streaming only game, and in terms of business as of now it wouldn't make sense to make a AAA game streaming only, and to make it next gen only would mean to leave too much money on the table.
They make it crossgen because they know the big majority of their userbase will continue in the previous gen.
It wouldn't be a good business for them to keep it next gen only. There aren't game design constraints for Street Fighter-like games, next gen only offers better visuals and shorter loading times plus minor things.
Other than that, if it would be a PS5 full exclusive (which won't) then they also would take advantage of a better lowest common denominator wifi (but players still could play very distant of their router, to have a shitty router, a shitty internet connection or to play online while other device in the same wifi is streaming Netflix).
Fighting games aren't affected by streaming speeds, so are a great candidate for crossgen games: just render them at a lower native resolution keeping steady 60fps, disable some shiny visual stutf and they have the same game.
Yes, as I mentioned before it happened with every single SF since SF2' Champion Edition. Many people complains about the most recent SF saying it's crap and that the previous one was great and way better. Until they release the next one. Then they switch to say the newest one is crap and the previous one, that they kept saying it was so bad then they switch to say it was very good.
They don't dislike the game too much when they play it daily a lot of hours to the point they are some of the best players in the world. They would switch to another game.
But they kept playing and as they played more they now say they love the game (it's that point of the SF cycle, they now got used to the current one, once SF6 gets released they won't like the changes and will say they would have prefered it to be like SFV). And well, there are millions of players, each one with their own opinion.
Tekken 7 pretty likely will outsell soon Tekken 3 as the best selling game in the series. MKX and MK11 are the best selling ones in the series. They both are the only ones who performed decently in sales during the dark pre-SFIV period, but also got highly boosted with the SFIV revival.
All the other series like KOF, Guilty Gear, Soul Calibur, Blazblue or DOA never had good sales, always have been way under MK, Tekken and SF. Guilty Gear Strive seems that now had a great launch and pretty likely will become the best selling (non DBZ) ever ARC Sys game thanks to its quality but also the popularity boost that gave them the Dragon Ball FighterZ IP. Even if you include here Smash is now performing way better than ever had in the franchise. SFIV started a 2nd golden age for the genre that is becoming the top golden age of the genre.
And part of that is because there is way more people now going to tournaments, watching them online and streaming gameplay.
They said that because sales were really bad for most games in the genre during that period (this includes MvC2 and CvS2), which caused to have way less new big games in the genre.
Yes, the FGC kept playing the games during the dark period even if it was a way smaller niche than before. The SFIV boom -supported by its eSports- caused the FGC to grow to the point now is bigger than ever.
I think 3S is probably the pinnacle of fighting games, the most polished one. In terms of OST I prefer the SF2 or SFEX1 style and obviously SF2 WW was the most influential and iconic, but I think 3S is my favorite one in terms of gameplay.
Nah, they never cared about changing or retconning what needed to fit what they wanted in the games. They even resurrected at least three guys, and one of them multiple times. SFV storyline canon happens just before and just after SF3, and seems SF6 will happen just after SFV, which means very shortly after SF3. They could make a 65 years old Chun to look like as if she was 30. I think they will simply avoid mentioning their age.
This means Ryu, Ken, Chun and so on will be able to keep the look they had in SF3, SFV or even SFIV. People will accept more iconic characters if they have their iconic looks, so I think they won't change them too much. To change them too much is risky (see banana Ken's case) so I think they will keep them with a conservative design and will keep risky changes for secondary costumes, which I'm pretty sure will be a lot of them.
I think they will give some protagonism to newer generations like Sean, that girl or Luke (Mel would be too young if it's set just after SFV/SF3 as I think), but I think we'll see returning people from the older generation because they won't want to repeat the same mistake they had in SF3 keeping the focus too far away from their iconic characters.
I think they won't remove the most popular characters, like the SF2 ones. Maybe not at launch, but they will be included in the game. They did a great job in SFV redesigning gameplay wise many characters to make them more unique and differentiated from the other characters, and at the same time they included disciples of old characters that offered new interesting stuff and were different enough. I think they will continue doing this in SF6
FFS Capcom please make all stages be perfect INPUT lag, one of main thing i hate about SF4 and specially SF5 is that there are a lot of laggy stages, usually the most detailed and beautiful ones, but honestly fuck this shit for real, if MK11 could do it why SF can't? Capcom better handle their shit better than this for SF6, i really hope they will en tout cas.
Fighting games traditionally are P2P during battles to reduce latency. 120Hz would mean to process, send, predict and fix more data. So to play offline would mean less latency, but more for online. Or to be more precise: it would be more noticiable. With a smaller framerate you have more time to receive and process data until the next time, and once you fix your rollback prediction, with a smaller framerate you'd correct less frames.Well for games that don't natively target for above 60 I've heard 120 Hz actually helps with latency, versus hurting it, because the inputs are able to be double-buffered on the server end. Additionally smoothness and frame pacing is better, helping with reactions. But this is with a hypothetical fighter programmed at 60 Hz, TBF.
I think, interestingly, sticking with this and still providing a 120 Hz mode could make input timings easier for more players, since they're basically getting a 2x input buffer for attacks that they don't have playing at 60 Hz. It's a natural way for companies to add in buffer windows for ease-of-use without compromising the game structure at the base 60 Hz. Almost sure if 120 Hz was available for displays when SFV came out originally, the team would've done this instead of what they actually ended up doing. And I'd like to think games like Samurai Showdown are a good showcase for what some of this functionality can provide, going forward.
I agree that they made most of their money from DLC. So in addition to become maybe at the end of this FY their best selling game ever and a top 10 best selling game ever in Capcom history, they will have made more money with DLC than with sales (something btw common in Gaas). So yes, they must be very happy with it even if it had a rocky start. That comeback was enough to be highlighted as the cover story for the fiscal year report sent to their investors, the year where they also had the stunning MHW crazy debut to the point the biggest selling game ever (with no discounts or DLC).Right, but a couple things to consider here. One, most of those sales are on big discounts, so it's not necessarily the same as selling those numbers at full or near-full original MSRP. Secondly, while people buying the game itself factors somewhat into them doing more DLC, the bigger reason they keep doing DLC is because there's a large dedicated part of the install base buying the DLC itself. That's where the lionshare of SFV revenue is coming from, not game copies being sold, but it's turned out to be a great model for Capcom in fixing the game up from its troubled launch.
Yes, in fact myself I almost don't play anymore but continue watching tournaments and proplayer personal streams or youtube videos and they make me go back the the game.I agree that eSports (well, I want to say FGC, but this is a different conversation) has helped with visibility of the game, particularly tournaments getting streamed on Twitch, Youtube, etc. Also a lot of the pro players in the game, even Japanese ones, stream it pretty consistently so they're in a way helping to foster a larger community for a game which means more people who eventually buy the DLC content which is what Capcom really wants for the game at this point and I'd imagine for SF6 as well once that comes out.
The game had one or two big gameplay rebalances per year, plus minor monthly tweaks an fixes, mostly when releaing a new character. To the casual crowd cinematic an specially arcade modes and more single stuff added in Arcade Edition, that edition already had the first input lag improvement and online MP fixes. Arcade Edition was the one highlighted in the 'comeback' results so I think yep, these hings were improved during Season 2 or so.Lol no, SFV got more than a bit of a rejection. The rejection was pretty severe from everyone not in the FGC once the problems became apparent. The Cinematic Story Mode (which they should've made more seasons for, as originally promised, IMO) helped give the game a boost a bit the summer (I think it was summer?) it came out, but that didn't last. The game just kind of limped along in terms of mainstream attention and whatnot until the Season 2 update came along, which is also where I think some of the first big gameplay updates were done (IIRC, the input frame buffer was reduced a few frames because at first it was like 8-9 frames and now it's 3 frames of buffer in the game).
100% agree and I think they will have with SF6 a way better netcode and amount of single player content and features at launch.If Capcom's really learned from SFV's abysmal launch, then they'll make sure the game's got some genuine single-player/casual-orientated content in there Day-1. I'm talking a robust Arcade mode, a relaunch of the Cinematic Story mode, multiple staple and a few new intermission Arcade mode mini-games, a starter art gallery and OST library, ending cinematics etc. They'll make sure the online is working out of the gate.
I think that if they continue with UE they will reuse many game modes like Tournament Mode and will have them or most of them ready at launch. If they got butthurted with input lag and other UE issues they may decide to move to RE engine, which would mean more work to rehash stuff from SFV.They'll make sure not to dumb down the game mechanics to try luring in more beginners (and instead do what you really need to do for getting them in, much better tutorials and some MP in-game currency/ranking system to incentivize skilled players to coach and help newcomers). They'll make sure features primed for online like Tournament Mode are able to be used as such Day 1, etc.
The big majority of the potential customers (casuals or not) will continue on PS4 & XBO, so this is why they make it crossgen: because they will sell more there during the first years.Right, which makes it all the more reason to NOT release PS4 or XBO native versions of the game.
If it gets released February 2023, it will be as I remember 2 years and 3 months after PS5 release. Same time happened between SFV and PS4 release and SFIV and PS3 release.SF6 is launching in late Year 2/early Year 3 of the current console generation, which is when most of the casuals who go for games like SF based on what the hardcore players of the scene are doing, actually make the transition to the newer consoles.
The more sales the better: if they are making it multiplatform and crossgen, they will expect way better sales than from SFV, both in sales and DLC. In their leaked roadmap document they had a sales estimation for the early months, I don't remember it but can double check it if interested, I saved the file.Besides, if Capcom's business model for the game really revolves around DLC content sales, it doesn't necessarily matter if they get big sales copies numbers Day 1; they can get consistent modest sales copies numbers months after launch while refreshing interest in the game with new DLC content that most of the players in the install base end up buying.
There are many reasons that explain why the generational transition this time will be slower:That's true, but it only really is an issue if the majority of the more casual types who buy into these types of fighters happen to be casual gamer types as a whole, but I don't think that's actually the case. It's like how someone can be a casual gamer on the whole but be hardcore into Animal Crossing; if they normally wait a few years before buying a new Nintendo system, but a new Animal Crossing comes Day 1, they're likely to just buy the console Day 1 just to play Animal Crossing. Doesn't make the m a hardcore/core gamer necessarily overall, but things like that happen.
I agree, for casuals is ok to play MK or SF on streaming. The problem is when they play against a hardcore player, who will complain about lag. So I think they won't put SF6 on streaming at least during the first year to make sure they get the best word of mouth possible during the launch window. Considering their bet on SFV, EVO, online tournaments etc I think Sony will want a marketing deal with SF6. And if they sign the same one they did for RE Village, it will mean it won't be on Gamepass for a while.But the very casual/mainstream ones who will stay on PS4/XBO hardware by the time SF6 launches? They honestly don't care and won't play at a high enough level to notice a difference. They'll just to want to play it as a fun game for a little while, won't matter to them if it's native or streamed.
No, a big majority of the userbase -casual or not- will continue on PS4 by the end of 2022/early 2023 even if PS5 continues breaking gaming history hardware sales records. And a tiny proportion will use streaming a bit less tiny than now. The big majority of their business will mean native PS4 game+dlc sales during the first year or two.So why do a native port for them when the majority of fighting game casuals will move over to buy current-gen system at or around the time SF6 releases, anyway?
This won't happen. Streaming is expensive so they will try to monetize their users as much as possible, as it is by charging a bigger fee because of bundling it with more stuff even if people doesn't use it.However for Microsoft at least it's almost a guarantee they will decouple xCloud from GamePass Ultimate sometime in the near future;
It won't happen even if Sony magically solves the chips issue (I think it's fair to assume it will continue there at least during the first half of 2023) and seriously destroys by a mile historical console sales records (I think they will keep barely beating PS4 and Switch records due to the chips).even if it's not until later 2022 or sometime 2023, it's likely going to happen. With Sony it's more up-in-the-air but considering their own strategy and most in the SFV install base (particularly those in the FGC) already upgrading from PS4 to PS5, having streaming as an option may not be as much of a priority there.
Console sales history and the chips shortage crysis say the big majority of the players will continue in the previous gen at the start of 2023.No, this isn't true. As a very general argument to justify why some companies as a whole are still supporting cross-gen natively, yes it has some merit. But in this specific case, I honestly don't think it holds true and gave some reasons as to why above.
I think the LoL game in terms of gameplay will have a pretty much traditional Street Fighter like combat gameplay. But will highly improve the genre in the part related to the GaaS/userbase count/consideration of player feedback to improve the game/business model/F2P side.Maybe we'll see some of that with the Riot games-developed LoL fighter, or some other fighter in the future. But for the bigger franchises (SF, MK, Injustice, Tekken, Smash etc.), they kind of don't have a reason to do that type of larger-scale innovation.
By streaming speeds I meant streaming from HDD, not xCloud/PS Now. Super fast SSDs open the door to change some game design and level design paradigms for games with big levels because now they won't need to hide streaming/loading times with corridors, elevators, unskippabale cutscenes etc. This will affect other genres in the future, but not SF-like games.Uh, this might be true in its own case, but doesn't this kind of contradict something you mentioned earlier?
About fighters being affected by latency of streaming? If you're supporting the idea that cross-gen native ports work because the dev can simply lower the resolution and VFX of the game on the older platform, then you have to support the idea of cross-gen streaming as a solution too, because you can do the exact same things with an instance of the game on older systems via cloud streaming!
MK and Tekken had good sales, the other ones never had good sales (let's say over 4-5M or so). Many of them not even 3M.Keep in mind when I say other fighting games "did well" during the supposed 'dark ages' pre-SFIV, I also mean in terms of game quality, or seeing big growth for their respective IP brands in various markets. KOF, GG, VF, DOA, Soul Calibur, MK, Tekken etc. all saw steady sales, increases in IP branding in various territories, and either general increases in quality or a return-to-form (Tekken, MK) during that period.
Can't remember how much (you can count it here) but I'd say SFIV series sold around 8M or above. But yes, with more platforms and versions. Tekken always sold more than SF.Across all it's versions SFIV was around roughly 6.5 million LTD. Tekken 6, on only two platforms and only one version release, sold roughly 55% of that figure.
Yes, but SFIV is the one who 'revived' the genre in 2008 with a smaller console userbase and a pretty niche genre. MKX instead was released in 2015 with a way bigger console userbase and an enlarged, not that small at all niche genre.MKX outsold SFIV that generation.
Tekken 3 sold 8M (best selling Tekken ever) which was insane back then. The best selling Capcom fighting game was SF2 for SNES with 6.3M (even if there are more versions and ports etc).And I'd personally argue that Tekken 3 was a bigger watershed moment for fighters on console (even if less of one overall than SF2 was for its day) than SFIV ended up being for console, though I think we can agree SFIV was a much bigger impact on the FGC/eSports scene than Tekken 3 (partly due to release timing and the technology of the era, TBF).
I'd say good sales today are 4-5M. Back in the 16-32 bits over 1M, maybe less was good sales. I remembeer SF2 was developed by around 20 people and was developed in some months, less than a year. Capcom had over 20 outsourcing companies working on SFIV and took several years to develop it, and same applies for SFV.We have to define what "good sales" are, though, because not every game needs a certain sales number to be financially successful.
Show me some receipts showing KOF, GG, SC or DOA having home or arcade sales or revenue close to SF, Tekken or MK because as far as I know their sales have always been way smaller.That applies to KOF (which is actually insanely popular in Korea and Latin America, has been for decades), GG, SC, etc. DOA, at least the first two entries, didn't necessarily need SF/Tekken home sales #s because they had arcade revenues to gain and they saved arcade production costs by licensing out the Model 2 from Sega (and in DOA2's case, NAOMI again from Sega).
A small exercise, spot where the 'dark age' is:I'm not trying to discredit SFIV in all of this, but I do think it's a bit nebulous to say it "started" a 2nd golden age, because that 2nd golden age was already underway prior to its release, with games like Tekken 5: Dark Resurrection, VF5 and Tekken 6. Also depending on what one values out of fighters, we could argue if this current period of fighters is the "best" or not.
I loved many of these games, but not sure if any of them sold 2M units. And many of them, even 1M.I mean, in terms of pure game mechanic polish and production budgets it's almost inarguable that it is. However, I personally miss the sheer variety of fighters like had been seen in the '90s. SNK for example had a myriad of fighters from KOF to Real Bout (Fatal Fury) to Last Blade to Samurai Showdown, and nowadays they've basically boiled down to KOF. Capcom had the Darkstalkers series, Rival Schools, Cyberbots, etc., and now they're basically just Street Fighter and maybe a VS game here and there. Not to mention other neat IP like Power Instinct, Breakers, Waku Waku 7, Star Gladiator, Psychic Force, Toshinden, Tobal, Erghiez, Bloody Roar, Fighting Vipers etc. falling to the wayside as the genre contracted partly due to contraction of arcades in the West.
As I said, Tekken and MK sell well. Some VF too. SNK, ARC and many other don't, as far as I know. I'd welcome receipts proving me wrong. Capcom did stop making fighting games because their previous fighting games did stop selling so they moved to make other games that did sell well for them, like RE or DMC. You can watch at their Platinum Titles page which ones sold over a million copies.Yes...from Capcom. But Namco, Sega, SNK, Midway etc. still supported with big releases. I do think the wavering in popularity for other Capcom IP tho like Resident Evil, and that "Project 5" stuff with Nintendo not working out as intended, impacted them in terms of doing another big fighter in the 6th gen, TBF.
I don't say it's the only on who helped to grow the FGC. I say that after a period with poor sales where some companies stopped making fighting game or even dissapeared, SFIV was a big hit and then many others were successful and some even came back. And many of them are performing now better than ever (or almost) in sales, and the genre is a growing trend that started with the SFIV spike.I'm just saying SFIV wasn't the only fighting game that helped with getting the FGC to grow larger. It might've helped tip it over into a main stride but the FGC was already seeing growth pre-SFIV thanks to earlier 7th-gen fighters taking advantage of online netcode, for example.
I love basically all SF games, it's hard for me do decide SF3 series or SF2 series, or inside them to choose a specific chapter. Maybe I'd choose their most recent one because it's the more complete and rebalanced one. Maybe I'd choose World Warrior too because of being the one that started the craziness. Or even if I may prefer SFA2 to SFA3, I spend over thousand hours (maybe around 2000) on SFA3 playing on PS1. I also loved -a bit less- the crossovers, Pocket Fighter, SFEX and the SFIV and SFV series.3S is a very love-hate relationship for me, personally. The fluidity of it is almost unmatched as far as 2D and even a lot of 3D fighters are concerned, but there are some things I actually preferred in 2I like the way that game handles air parries to reset back to neutral, which encouraged a stronger ground game for footsies. 3S parries are also pretty spammable as OSes once you get to a certain level, and the roster balance is fucked. Certain characters like Remy don't even have a reliable cross-up (as in, 99% of the time the one button that can maybe cross-up doesn't actually do it, very VERY contextual that one).
That said, I do prefer it over the SF2 games, it's probably down to timing for me though. I also prefer it and 2I over the Alpha series. 2I IMO has the best background art in the entire series and one of the best overall OSTs (the other ones I would put at that level are SF EX +Alpha and SF EX2). For SF6 I honestly would not mind mash of fully 3D characters (using SFV artstyle but improved) combined with pre-rendered highly detailed 3D stages as multi-layered 2D stages recreating the style of 2I stages in great detail.
Because 2I is the one SF with background stages I feel can actually compete with SNK's from the '90s/early '00s era (SNK I feel have the best background stages of any fighting game maker, in terms of 2D fighters at least).
YupWell I think SF3's bigger issue was they literally didn't bring back most of the old cast at all. They didn't even want Ryu and Ken back at first!
Many people hates changes. If things like removing or changing mechanics like parries or focus attack/back dash etc., I think some may cause riots if they introduce 'strikers'/support characters or make a numbered SF a tag battle game. Or if looking at SF League and the Tokyo Olympics tournament, they turn it into a 3 vs 3 team battle game. I'd welcome all these features specially if optional and the traditional 1 vs 1 matches are available. But haters would gonna hate.Maybe with a built-in character-specific tagging mechanic, you pick the usual character but they have a dedicated partner who you can tag in to do various techniques with, something like that. Very basic spitballing.
In fact after SF Alpha 3 they released Alpha 3 Upper and Alpha 3 Max.Wtf are you talking about?
If there will be another Alpha Game it will be Alpha 4 not 3.