Ebophilia, pedo defense force like to point that out for some reason.
All I'm saying is that technically that poster was correct. Nothing more, and don't even attempt to paint me with the "pedo defense force" brush ffs lol.I know what the poster is saying may be correct but also kinda wrong. The meaning of words evolves through time, today the general idea is that a pedo is someone who trys to sexually abuse a younger person in an illegal fashion. There's really no point in coming in here and being "WELL AKSHULLAY, he's not a pedo!"
Words have defined meanings. There is a pretty decent difference between the 2 terms. A 17 year old having sex with a 16 year old is generally fine, but a 17 year old having sex with a 12 year old is absolutely not. One of those is 100% pedophilia, the other is 100% not. Can you see why it is actually pretty important to use the correct terms? Legally I could pursue and have sexual relations with a 16 year old here in Australia as a almost 40 year old man and no law has been broken, and it's definitely not pedophilia. I wouldn't because it's creepy and morally disgusting, but you get the point.
In this case though I agree, it doesn't really matter - 50 odd year old guy with a 15 year old vs a 13 year old is irrelevant. It's nasty and illegal.