AMD destroys Nvidia in rasterization, now raytracing is the most important thing, even though it's only available in a few games and devs who said they would support it at Jensen Huang's "it just works" presentation, have still not done so years after their games have launched.
Nvidia is now on the second RTX string, their first was a farce, DLSS 1.0 failed. They are now back on the coattails of what they denied with DLSS 1.0......That's (TAA).... and of course DLSS 2.0 is just TAA with some PP. You hardly have devs talking about 4k DLSS, not 1440p or 1080p.....Remember they spoke of 4k native DLSS too, how much of that do we see in benchmarks? Zilch, because RTX is a resource hog and people are pretending Nvidia has better raytracing because of proprietary works shenanigans in games like control et al....
DLSS 1.0 failed, it was pitched as an A.I enhanced image reconstruction technique, but that failed, had several drawbacks. Even their current DLSS 2.0 still has less background details, so what they do is super sharpen a blurry image and focus on foreground images and people are talking about better texture resolve. The media is truly biased. Everything Amd does, they try to downplay, but DLSS will never take off as Super Resolution will despite the free PR from the press, since pretty much all devices will use SR, most devs will support it because it will be as easy as AF and it will be something implemented through a toggle in your driver software or in-game. No extra development from devs...Now in this case, it just works, but AMD is not going to use that line unlike Nvidia.....
That right there is the difference between these two companies.....One uses hype and marketing and the press. The other ensures it delivers to gamers, I mean all gamers.......The Open standard approach ensures that. Propietary BS in the PC space? be gone...
What struck me again though is his t-shirt...could it be he woke up that morning, couldn't find a clean shirt and decided to cut a hole in his bedsheet and wear it?
