That is not patent.
So would someone with a series X or PC also get those same benefits you speak of? I'm curious if this is some secret sauces or just another case of fanboyism. Because you still think wireless is faster and lower latency, even though solid evidence has been shown to you, several times now. Can you tell me why wired headphones will always sound better than wireless? Why does your phone charge faster via cable, vs wireless charging? Why can you transfer files faster via physical media, vs wirelessly? Why are wired mice more responsive, with lower latency, compared to a wireless one? Why do power lines go directly to your house, instead of wireless energy? Do you see where I'm going with this?
Don't generalize wireless.
Don't worry about me, I will be getting a PS5 too.
Brother you are fucking insane.
Go easy, it's not his fault that there isn't a 'roll your eyes into the back of your head' response.
Brother you are fucking insane.
Lower latency is always going to be a positive. I'll never complain about it. But I'll never understand the constant need to upsell wifi 6, because it's featured in your favorite console. I don't care if XSX, PS5, and PC all have WiFi 6. At the end of the day wired will remain superior, no matter what angle you take on it.
Brother you are fucking insane.
I got 100 up 100 down, been playing wifi on consoles for years without issues, will wifi6 benefit me?i mean wifi6 is great, but your ISP needs to provide wifi6 service (and may increase monthly costs). I talked to xfinitiy, at &t, and they stated the maximum speeds they can provide is
1 gigabits per second
a lot of gamers dont care for wifi6 because they will be using wired cable connection to get the best connection with no lag
pls explain how this will benefit me if i am capped at 100/100. What is Wifi6 going to do for me better then what i currently have? Mind you, i have no issues playing on $40 router. How am i going to benefit from wifi6 and an expensive gaming router vs what i have now? This is what i am curious about.
What comparison is that?Lower latency is always going to be a positive. I'll never complain about it. But I'll never understand the constant need to upsell wifi 6, because it's featured in your favorite console. I don't care if XSX, PS5, and PC all have WiFi 6. At the end of the day wired will remain superior, no matter what angle you take on it.
Actually you don't.
I think the price difference between a Wifi6 router and your everyday ethernet cable router is, let's say, significant. Yet, you can use the cheap one now and have better performance than the big bucks wifi version.
You need.
That is fine so make a proper comparison saying the use of a router for Ethernet is cheaper than for WiFi 6 (that new hot tech that is indeed expensive today).
From real life tests without interferences on WiFi signal the latency seems similar while in terms of speed only Gigabit Ethernet beat it.
With all things being equal, same router, same distance to device. Which would have lower latency, faster throughout, higher bandwidth, etc.
Wired vs wireless. Getting a direct answer from y'all, is like trying to pull the master sword from the stone, while only having 12 heart containers in botw.
It only happens if the device in close to PS.
Similar latency means that one of them is better than the other. There's no point in trying to argue, as we both know which is the better option. Unless you absolutely cannot connect via hard wired, wifi should be the last resort. Just like in some crossplay games which shows which players are on pc vs consoles, we should be about to see who is using wireless, so you can avoid playing with those people if you so choose to do so.
Similar means equal lol
Now I'm thinking there's a connection between New Jersey and North Korea. FUCK.Similar =/= equal.
Prime example
I posted you the facts, articles mentioning the wifi 6 specs and wifi 6 real world tests. It isn't 'secret sauces', 'fanboyism' or what I think. You are the fanboy attacking me with just your baseless opinions not backed with facts.
I see where you are going with this, you are mentioning many things totally unrelated to the wifi 6 vs console wired connection because you don't want to accept that the facts say that the wifi 6 is better than the wired connection for consoles and don't have any fact to back your wishes.
I posted the sources many times in the thread, won't post them again. Go and search them. One of them was a real world latency test made by Parsec using a home 802.11ac router testing wifi 2.4GHz vs 5.0GHz vs Gigabit Ethernet. 5.0Ghz 802.11ac wifi gave ~5ms of latency and ethernet gave ~1ms. Other sources posted in the thread mention 802.11ax cuts a 75% of the wifi 802.11ac latency, which would mean ~1,2ms of latency. With old wifi systems the difference between wifi and wired was of even dozens of ms and wifi latency was very unstable, but in newer wifi systems (5.0GHz) it got more stable and reduced vastly the latency, to the point that the difference between wifi 6 and wired is under 1ms, which makes it basically the same, and on top of that wifi 6 offers higher speeds (over 20-50% in real world tests, links also posted in this thread) and other benefits.
Yeap you have no argument against facts lolSimilar =/= equal.
Prime example
So where is proof that wifi 6 beats wired connection? My motherboard with 5gbps is faster than wifi 6 and has less latency. My argument is that wired will always beat wireless, in every possible way, every scenario, every single time.
Go and read the thread, I explained that several times and posted the sources with facts like the real world tests results and standard specifications.
It isn't all the same for me. A wired connection using 10/100 LAN with a cat 4 damaged cabled isn't the same than a proper gigabit lan with a proper cat 7 cable, and a 802.11b wifi isn''t the same than a 802.11ax wifi. And in both wired or wifi, the distance affects stuff like speed, packet loss, there are also interferences and so on.
I read the thread already. You're arguing over semantics, as my original posts in this very thread mentioned consoles and PCs. You can read the thread to fact check things if you'd like. But since you are strictly talking about ps5, let's start from there.
It isn't wrong, it's a fact backed by the specifications and real world tests. Which facts do you have to prove it's wrong?
With the factual data we posted in the thread, we know both this wired and wireless connections that PS5 will use will have a latency of around 1ms. We don't know exactly which will have better latency but in any case it won't matter because should be a difference of under 1ms, which is basically nothing: way less than a 60fps game frame, so players won't notice it.
