geordiemp
Member
Enlighten us please.
So a post by a notebook journalist and opinion is news to you ? Really ?
OK timdog. Lets all post opinion pieces from N4G, should be fun....
Last edited:
Enlighten us please.
Get a life, OP.
I'm not going to even comment until Digital Foundry gets their hands on the consoles this upcoming holiday season and test the shit out of them and see how big of a difference there really is.
Using RDNA 1 to hypothesize when the RDNA 2 isn't even out in the market is disingenuous to say the least.
Again, both companies can claim whatever they want, but at the end of the day, Digital Foundry and the rest will prove the difference, whether it's 15% or 30%.
@FranXico, OP started the thread with this quip indicating the intent behind such a blatant clickbait thread.
Next time I’ll post about Cerny’s beautiful dressing style to improve my post history in your eyes.1. Check the source of the content
2. Check the OPs post history
Also cut the shit with playing victim here.
OP didn't you know that you can't really post negative info about PS5 here.
Getting bored and slightly irritated by every amateur who's ever put together a PC talking like they are expert coders and system architects.
Lol cearly lots of people do since you know everything revolves around social media engagement. It's an important metric to gauge interest.Are you serious right now ?
You are taking fanboyism way too far, don't shoot the messenger.
We have tweet threads (no one gives a shit), you even posted a controller thread.
Really? 17% difference makes a generational leap in graphics?
Notebookcheck is an incredible site with in-depth reviews on laptop and mobile hardware, along for charts for performance hierarchy. I don't know who wrote this article as I haven't even read it yet, but their site is highly reputable.I bashed the Crytek Guy source, so in fairness, I gotta ask, who the hell are Notebookcheck.net?
Are these reputable sources?
This seems like clickbait
Nothing changed just the interpretation of the results.People can compare RDNA, RDNA 2, GCN, etc. The point of it, is to show that each of these architectures exhibit less gains, when overclocking to the high end with less CU's, versus running the chip a little slower, while having more CU's. Unless physics have been altered or there is some secret sauce involved, this trend will continue in gpu technology.
So what are we supposed to believe?Yeap RDNA benchmarks are proof of what RDNA 2 can do.
People needs to stop the useless comparisons.
I don’t expect the laws of physics to suddenly work in reverse on RDNA2. The extent will most likely be different but the trend will be the same. I find opinions based on actual experimental benchmarking to be a lot more valuable than those supported by PR talking points or just professional credentials.It can be shocking to some but PS5 is not based in the same hardware as 5700 XT.
The examples of overclocking in the 5700 XT tells us nothing about the PS5 because 2.2Ghz can be the normalized clocks of RDNA 2 with 40 CUs.
Please make sure you then get an appropriate source so people can take your thread seriously.Next time I’ll post about Cerny’s beautiful dressing style to improve my post history in your eyes.
Or do you believe in AMD or not.I don’t expect the laws of physics to suddenly work in reverse on RDNA2. The extent will most likely be different but the trend will be the same. I find opinions based on actual experimental benchmarking to be a lot more valuable than those supported by PR talking points or just professional credentials.
Even 40% was barely anything PS4 vs Xbox One. At best case scenario for XSX we're looking at less of an advantage than that, then you throw in dynamic resolution. lol. It'll be another generation of slight differences, if at all.
It's not lik RDNA2 is a new architecture, it's an update. Of course it will be comparable, most of the 50 % efficiency gains of RDNA2 come from a smaller node and stuff like VRS.I don’t expect the laws of physics to suddenly work in reverse on RDNA2. The extent will most likely be different but the trend will be the same. I find opinions based on actual experimental benchmarking to be a lot more valuable than those supported by PR talking points or just professional credentials.
Looks how GCN clocks showed little gain performance after xxxxMhz while RDNA continue scaling good in performance way over that same xxxxMhz.I don’t expect the laws of physics to suddenly work in reverse on RDNA2. The extent will most likely be different but the trend will be the same. I find opinions based on actual experimental benchmarking to be a lot more valuable than those supported by PR talking points or just professional credentials.
I don't disagree with the "article" at all, but they're talking about "on paper" this should be the case. On paper car A should go around a track faster than car B. Team A should smash Team B. What I do disagree on is that you assume people actually "Know" how hardware works. Sorry, but being an armchair engineer, even if you've read up on this, is not the same as being an actual hardware engineer. It's like training kickboxing but never fighting, training and fighting are two very very different things.This is all the be expected for whoever has any notion on how hardware works, anything else is Fanboys delusional reasoning's!
Downclock if old.
There's a difference. Ps4 had a 40% advantage, but it was 40% compressed low quality pixels, XSX has 20% advantage, but it's 20% uncompressed highest quality pixels. It's miles ahead!!Even 40% was barely anything PS4 vs Xbox One. At best case scenario for XSX we're looking at less of an advantage than that, then you throw in dynamic resolution. lol. It'll be another generation of slight differences, if at all.