Do you suggest that GameTrailers or Easy Allies suck? And they are crazy putting it there and not Doom 1 +2 or AvP'99?
No. But it's an opinion. Liking a game's atmosphere is a matter of taste. Everyone has different tastes. There's no argument. It doesn't have to do anything with a technical comparison.
It is better atmosphere which made it scary? I experienced it in it and I saw people myself being jump scared by it? I have never seen anything like this with any other game. I guess that I and other people had to be hypnotized or something if it was not AvP.
Why are you even arguing? This is a matter of taste. If you and your friends were scare, good for you! I, on the other hand, was not. And that has nothing to do with comparing tech.
Lol. More advanced and looks worse. Interesting. Why lower-res sprites? What caused this limit?
Sprite resolution isn't the only thing that makes graphics good. Level architecture/complexity is far more important. Doom is more complex and is also smoother than AVP and also has dynamic lighting, all together making it look better overall. AVP only looks better in certain still screenshots. Because when it moves it looks like shit. But hey! At least i can admit there is one single element that looks better in AVP, despite me being a "Doom fanatic". You can't even admit AVP has shit frame rate (among other issues).
Wow! No one noticed this negative impact in AvP's gameplay. I wonder why. Oh, wait. I know. Because it is not an FPS game.
Doesn't matter if it's an FPS or Open world or a racing game. Low frame rate makes every game look like shit. You are just a huge blinded fanboy. Every single person posted here about frame rate has mentioned it's an issue.
Do you realize that AvP is not FPS that is why there is no issue with fps in it? Also lol that you want to teach me about FPS and fps difference.
Read my previous comments again or get some rest if you are too tired.
Doesn't matter what genre the game is, 10-15 fps is a slow, jerky frame rate for any game.
I did not dismiss them. I asked him about how games were categorized back then in comparison to current times and what rating criteria system was used? But I guess it is too complicated for him and you as well. Lol.
The GT video is an example that a game was special. Also you forgot to criticize the list yourself. Is it a bad one? Are their arguments wrong?
Nah, you just ignore everything everyone else is telling you in this thread. Or your memory gets reset whenever you read a post. You are alone here, everyone disagrees with you and your poll backfired. I guess by acting like a troll makes it easier to cope instead of taking the L. But don't worry, i will always be here to remind you, i'll never get tired of it
As for the list, i agree for some games and disagree for some others. It's a list someone made, Wow. Happy now?
Lol. Where is a terminal layout for SL2? I still see Med Lab, Armory there. Very useful and important info if you play the game. BTW SL2 is one of base floors and it matches a shape of the base, not a spaccraft.
Every map in AVP looks similar. Every map is just squares and 90 degrees angles. The engine can't draw something different. Very useful and important info if you know how a game engine works. But of course, you don't post any proof to backup your claims.
Yes it does.
and there is no issue with frame rate.
Yes there is. It runs at 10/15 fps. That's literally a low frame rate. Anything below 20fps is considered shit by 99% of people, except obsessed, blinded fanboys.
You did not play it back then
That must be the 30th time you say this. And i will respond with the same way: It doesn't matter. The game runs at a shitty frame rate despite me playing it. Even if i didn't exist, the game would still run at 10/15 fps. It would not magically run smoother if i did play it. And yes, 10/15 fps was slow even by 1994 standards. That's like Starfox on SNES, nobody is pretending the game didn't have a shit frame rate just because it's old. The only reason most people tolerated such low frame rates is because they didn't have a choice.
and your mind was already spoiled by advancements in games and hardware
And yet, i never compared AVP with newer games. I compared it with an OLDER game actually, which is DOOM. Your logic doesn't make sense because if it did i wouldn't care for DOOM either.
while trying it on emulators. Not to mention it does not work perfectly on any of them. You just saw not properly emulated game. Not to mention it does not work perfectly on any of them.
Ah, emulation. Another field where you don't have any knowledge about, yet still have a strong opinion nonetheless.
Phoenix is an accurate Jaguar emulator. AVP in particular plays perfectly on it and even Virtual Jaguar emulates it just fine. The longplay video in this thread is from an older version or different emulator. I have seen the game running on the real hardware and it's the same. But nice try trying to lie and convince me the game on the Jaguar runs smoother on real hardware. Your desperation really shows.
You just saw not properly emulated game on flat screen thinking that it is some Wolf/Doom FPS but it was not.
Unfortunately for you, both Phoenix and VJ emulate it properly. This means its pretty easy for most people to witness how shitty AVP plays with that slow frame rate and you can't lie about it. I'm so sorry.