Fbh
Member
The ones that come to mind right now:
DMC Devil May Cry: I still prefer classic DMC but it doesn't mean that this game was bad. I enjoyed it at as a different take on the franchise and taken on its own it's a solid action game. I also really liked some of the cool things it did visually, specially with environments. Definitely a lot more variety to the levels and their design than the disappointment that was DMC5
Dead Space 3 / Resindt Evil 5: Put them together because I like them for the same reason. I totally get why people dislike them, both have a focus on co-op which isn't what people want from a traditionally single player franchise and, more importantly, both swapped horror for action. But if you ignore the history behind their franchise and just taken them a 2 standalone games, I do think both were really fun coop shooters. I actually miss having more games like this as it feels like a lot of them have been replaced by boring and grindy "live services".
Dark Souls 2: Do I think it's worse than 1,3 and Bloodborne? Yeah. But I still think it's a good game
Dragon Age Inquisition: Everyone hates this game but I didn't think it was that bad, it's definitely far from the best game by Bioware but IMO it's the last decent thing they made and it was MUCH better than 2. Visuals where nice, story was fun besides a disappointing ending and IMO the combat wasn't that deep but at higher difficulties and playing around with combos I don't think it was "press X to win" as some people claim. I think the biggest issue is that they should have made 2 categories for side content, something like "Quests" and "activities" because while it does have some fun quests, trying to figure out which ones were worth it and which ones turned into crappy MMO style fetch quests was a pain.
DMC Devil May Cry: I still prefer classic DMC but it doesn't mean that this game was bad. I enjoyed it at as a different take on the franchise and taken on its own it's a solid action game. I also really liked some of the cool things it did visually, specially with environments. Definitely a lot more variety to the levels and their design than the disappointment that was DMC5
Dead Space 3 / Resindt Evil 5: Put them together because I like them for the same reason. I totally get why people dislike them, both have a focus on co-op which isn't what people want from a traditionally single player franchise and, more importantly, both swapped horror for action. But if you ignore the history behind their franchise and just taken them a 2 standalone games, I do think both were really fun coop shooters. I actually miss having more games like this as it feels like a lot of them have been replaced by boring and grindy "live services".
Dark Souls 2: Do I think it's worse than 1,3 and Bloodborne? Yeah. But I still think it's a good game
Dragon Age Inquisition: Everyone hates this game but I didn't think it was that bad, it's definitely far from the best game by Bioware but IMO it's the last decent thing they made and it was MUCH better than 2. Visuals where nice, story was fun besides a disappointing ending and IMO the combat wasn't that deep but at higher difficulties and playing around with combos I don't think it was "press X to win" as some people claim. I think the biggest issue is that they should have made 2 categories for side content, something like "Quests" and "activities" because while it does have some fun quests, trying to figure out which ones were worth it and which ones turned into crappy MMO style fetch quests was a pain.