-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Dr. Claus
Vincit qui se vincit
They did. After banning numerous people and closing close to a 100+ threads that weren't spouting the same tired cliche lines. Take a look at revedit to get a good look at how pathetic they are.
GymWolf
Member
Wow they really want to see this thing failing spectacularly uh??!
Krathoon
Member
The funny thing is that I didn't post anything. They say you can request to post, but I tried that and it seems like I am totally locked out.
Krathoon
Member
No Abbey Russle love in this thread. She always amused me. Her and the Spookin' with Scoops guy.
Dr. Claus
Vincit qui se vincit
I am just waiting for a "G4Uncensored" subreddit to come out.
EverythingsOverrated
Member
This was actually one of my first thoughts as well. I did some quick searching and it looks like Comcast might be the one funding this, which makes sense. One thing the last few years has shown is is how an independent youtuber can generate a ridiculous amount of views and revenue on a shoestring budget. Something like this pretty much has to depend on funds from a mega corporation.
Interested to see how long they stick around. When you're paying a decent sized crew corporate is less likely to be patient enough to see if they can grow their audience.
Chittagong
Gold Member
I notice that after four years, ResetEra has seeped out from the depths of the internet and assumed a human form
I think I will pass on your condenceding, shrieking woke host, “G4”, thx bye
Omnipunctual Godot
Gold Member
What was arguably worse for me was hearing that they don't actually write their own reviews. They're basically talking heads reading reviews that are done by committee.
I watched about three minutes of Sessler and Froskurrin's review of Death Stranding, and it felt weird. Why should I care about your thoughts and little quips about the game when you probably didn't even play it? It just came off as disingenuous after that.
I watched about three minutes of Sessler and Froskurrin's review of Death Stranding, and it felt weird. Why should I care about your thoughts and little quips about the game when you probably didn't even play it? It just came off as disingenuous after that.
strange headache
Banned
Honey Bunny
Member
Gina Darling thread
Chittagong
Gold Member
She is actually funny. The sarcasm was a too thick to notice on the G4 video but this is hilarious
Krathoon
Member
It is weird because you don't know how much of it is actually them.
Dr. Claus
Vincit qui se vincit
Its disgusting the level of discourse these cunts are pushing. Literally any time you suggest you disagree with frosk, you are immediatley labeled as a sexist. That you are a perverted man. That you are a bigot. These people need to be put into a fucking mental hospital.
Dr. Claus
Vincit qui se vincit
I certainly don't remember it being that way. Seems ever since the popularization of sites like Twitter and Facebook, these mentally ill personalties started to make a massive appearance. Even normal people (at the time) such as Jesse Cox and Adam Sessler, who certainly had their personal views, weren't so massively cuntish.
Touch fuzZy. get BizZay
Member
She got a neck tattoo that says "bad tattoo"
FNT have an overall good point, that nerds want authenticity and they can smell the corpo stench.
Last edited:
Dick Jones
Gold Member
I don't know about anyone else but I can't wait for Jirard the Completionist's episode on G4 after it folds. He usually completes things quickly 
AGRacing
Member
Amen. Why WOULD I click on their link?!
ShirAhava
Plays with kids toys, in the adult gaming world
Its actually comedian Chrissie Mayr
AGRacing
Member
I need another update!!! That is a ridiculous ratio hahaUpdate:
AGRacing
Member
She does a killer Grace Randolph as well.
Krathoon
Member
The internet definitely saw through this.
CGiRanger
Banned
When Fake FROSK is so much better than Real FROSKThe best thing to come out of this mess
G4 should swap them.
Majormaxxx
Member
She has a point. But It's not really sexism. She (or they whatever pronouns) is not a likeable person. You could be a tomboy or non-binary and still be likeable and charismatic. A TV presenter has to earn the public adoration. It's not a given. People not liking her doesn't equal sexism. Sex appeal exists as a thing whether she likes that or not.
BadBurger
Is 'That Pure Potato'
I get them banning people and deleting threads, but whoever they're allowing to handle their community and social media presence is really dumb. Reddit is one of the chief engagement tools out there for them for the kind of product they're selling, and rather than simply moderate they're literally killing a huge chunk of their engagement by just shutting down the subreddit (which is essentially what they're doing).
I don't disagree with what this Indiana Black woman said (I forget what her dumb internet handle is), but the producers never should have let her say it on air, and now they're double fucking themselves on Reddit. Just a management shitshow all around.
It's also a TV channel again, and yes Comcast is funding them. It's why they came out of the gate with the large sets, large crew, etc.
Last edited:
Setsuna Mudou
Member
That's fucking hilarious
Almost as good as Machine Gun Kelly original takes, talking about "dead man walking", MS Buying Bioware and Hogwarts Legacy being Xbox exclusive
Lukaku's First Touch
Member
Like someone else already said, with this rant she makes sure she cant get fired by her white straight boss. If she is, she'll scream sexism/mysoginy accusations of the roof.
MALpractice311
Member
Here's the thing, her main premise is not entirely wrong. Telling someone you like jerking off to them without having a pre-existing sexual relationship with them is gross and weird in real life and is clearly sexual harassment in school or the work place, as is telling someone they're too ugly to fuck or jerk off to. You would not or should not do this in real life and if you do, you're an asshole and if it's in school or the workplace, you should be sued for sexual harassment, lose your job, and be expelled and if it was my wife or our daughter that was the victim, I'd find the fucker that said it and punch him in the fucking mouth. So, if there are people making these kinds of comments in their videos or chats, she's in the right. That being said, this is the internet and not real life and there are at least three very easy solutions to this problem.
(1) You ignore them. Don't read the comments. Don't read the chat.
(2) You state up front you will not tolerate sexist or racist speech or other hate speech and then ban or block people who violate those rules.
(3) You disable comments and chat altogether.
What I find laughable is her revisionist G4 history. Morgan Webb, Olivia Munn, Sara Jean Underwood, Layla Kayleigh, Kristin Holt, and probably 95% of the rest of the female hosts were clearly hired because, number one, they're attractive and, number two, they can talk about tech/games/geek culture. Nearly all of them also either engaged in risque content on their respective shows or did risque photoshoots and modeling in men's magazines. They sexualized themselves. They understood that gaming and tech is a male-dominated hobby and had no issue being eye candy for their male audience.
So that brings us back to the present. The old G4, because of their often risque content and hot female hosts, developed a largely male audience who, upon hearing about the G4 revival, probably expected the new G4 to harken back to the days of Morgan and Layla bikini photoshoots, Olivia shoving hotdogs in her mouth, and Sara Jean going on a naked bike ride. As we now know, that's not what the new G4 is about and the largely male audience is negatively comparing the two G4 eras, which new G4 doesn't like. In that case, you shouldn't have called yourself G4. New G4 invited the comparison by using the name G4, so deal with it.
(1) You ignore them. Don't read the comments. Don't read the chat.
(2) You state up front you will not tolerate sexist or racist speech or other hate speech and then ban or block people who violate those rules.
(3) You disable comments and chat altogether.
What I find laughable is her revisionist G4 history. Morgan Webb, Olivia Munn, Sara Jean Underwood, Layla Kayleigh, Kristin Holt, and probably 95% of the rest of the female hosts were clearly hired because, number one, they're attractive and, number two, they can talk about tech/games/geek culture. Nearly all of them also either engaged in risque content on their respective shows or did risque photoshoots and modeling in men's magazines. They sexualized themselves. They understood that gaming and tech is a male-dominated hobby and had no issue being eye candy for their male audience.
So that brings us back to the present. The old G4, because of their often risque content and hot female hosts, developed a largely male audience who, upon hearing about the G4 revival, probably expected the new G4 to harken back to the days of Morgan and Layla bikini photoshoots, Olivia shoving hotdogs in her mouth, and Sara Jean going on a naked bike ride. As we now know, that's not what the new G4 is about and the largely male audience is negatively comparing the two G4 eras, which new G4 doesn't like. In that case, you shouldn't have called yourself G4. New G4 invited the comparison by using the name G4, so deal with it.
A Rifter in Space
Banned
G4 wanted people to react to this bitch's rant. They want the attention. People like her like the attention because they can use any made-up examples from then on out as a way to grift money and grab more and more of the cultural pie. I'm glad most people realizing she's a massive piece of shit but sending nasty emails and creating videos like that grifter The Quartering is obviously doing is just playing right into her hands.
People like her go nuts when no one's talking about them. You get way more payoff just telling her to shut the fuck up, go sell Subaru's to lesbian tankie communes or something, and maybe she'll find someone who likes 3/10's with bad attitudes and leaving it at that.
People like her go nuts when no one's talking about them. You get way more payoff just telling her to shut the fuck up, go sell Subaru's to lesbian tankie communes or something, and maybe she'll find someone who likes 3/10's with bad attitudes and leaving it at that.
ManaByte
Gold Member
Krathoon
Member
Yeah. Frosk's statement made them sound like hypocrites and as long as they have Gina Darling on the show, they are hypocrites.
They shot themselves in the foot.
If they are going to do this, they are going to have to directly state it and drop Gina Darling.
I don't know if they have the nerve to do that.
Last edited:
Excess
Member
I've started thinking about this a lot with regards to everything in social media. Whenever you generalize groups of people and point to egregious examples that often represent a fringe demographic, you're not only going to get a response from those who may deserve it, but you're also going to get an unintentional response from the group as a whole, guilty or not. In this case she's referring to men in the industry making no distinction between who or what groups specifically are responsible. And what's the natural response of man who has to sit and listen to that? Well, here you have it.
It seems to apply to almost anything on social media these days, and the worst part is that she's now using a small handful of hate emails to "prove her point". It's all the confirmation bias she ever needed to continue feeling hateful and spiteful of straight men who happen to "jerk off" to beautiful women.
Last edited:
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
Reddit has been compromised a long time ago. You go to the Joe Rogan sub, and 90% of the posts are bashing him. It’s a complete upside down than what Reddit was 5 years to a decade ago. It’s now CULTivated.
Last edited:
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
Thank fuck she’s wHyte, or you’d also be called a racist.
Dr. Claus
Vincit qui se vincit
Except she is objectively wrong on everything she stated.
1.) People are not pissed at her because she isn't as "bangable" as previous hosts. A few dumbass trolls may have stated such, but most are pissed at her because she is a flaky dumbass who can't handle criticism. She routinely makes wrong claims, never admits fault, and tries to toss everyone under the "they are sexist!" umbrella.
2.) Gaming does not have an "endemic" sexism problem. Its always a tiny minority that lives on social media. If there were endemic sexist problems, then why is Hololive not also affected? Why are women like Micah from LastStandMedia not constantly bombarded with hate and vitriol like Frosk claims?
3.) Old G4 put attractive looking people because men, women, and others (NB/Trans/etc), like looking at attractive people. They also hired them because they were ENTERTAINING. They had PASSION, they could ENGAGE the audience, and they had basic KNOWLEDGE of the industry they were representing. Something Frosk does not. Frosk has been wrong more often than not and its why she was kicked out of the LoL scene. I don't even play LoL past maybe 1-2 games every few months but even *I* knew what she was saying during streams was complete cockamamie.
Anyone who claims she was "right" is someone who needs to get off social media and actually see what the real world is like.