• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Facebook and Instagram told to lift ban on breasts

What should be permitted on social media


  • Total voters
    193

AJUMP23

Gold Member
#freetheweenie
Season 5 Donna GIF by Parks and Recreation
 

Tams

Gold Member
Just had some adolescents try really hard to get me to answer if I watch Pornhub (along with how big my penis is) today. And these are relatively sheltered Japanese kids.

Not sure seeing some tits on Facebook and Instagram (the former of which they don't even use and the latter increasingly less so) is going to be any sort of eye opener for them.
 

Quasicat

Member
Everything I’ve read makes it sound that the only breasts seen will be trans and non-binary…that sounds discriminatory.
 

Sub_Level

wants to fuck an Asian grill.
Instagram is already softcore and has been for years. Banning/suspending girls for showing nips is supremely stupid. If a kid sees that content its the fault of the parent not the platform & certainly not the girl.
 
As an American, our weird obsession over nudity has always been dumb to me. Hard-core violence? Yay! Bare nekkid titties? Someone think of the children!
Fake violence is fake, but nudity is always real. Well, sometimes it's fake, but it's still real on top of being fake.
 
Is there an age restriction on this? It’s normally legal for boys and men to be shirtless, no problem. Now if a 14 year old girl who decides she’s a man walks around shirtless and starts posting photos, is that illegal?
 

Azurro

Banned
I voted no breasts because, just like a nudist beach, you might be thinking of hot girls showing off their boobs, and instead all you will get is old, saggy boobs and old manboobs pics. No thank you.
 
so you'd put a 4 year old watchhing a naked breast on the telly side by side with a 4 year old see someone being cut with a knife?
This isn't either or. I don't have to accept either, and I wouldn't. That's an inappropriate age for either. But when a kid is older, I'd rather they get gradually introduced to fake movie violence rather than gradually introduced to fake movie sex. But again, there isn't an objective truth to any of this.
 

22•22

NO PAIN TRANCE CONTINUE
I came into this world sucking on titties, and god damnit, I plan to go out doing the same!

I applaud your sentiment yet find it rather ahem difficult to imagine said scenario.

I was born crying and goddamn if I don't when I pass over.
 

Kimahri

Banned
This isn't either or. I don't have to accept either, and I wouldn't. That's an inappropriate age for either. But when a kid is older, I'd rather they get gradually introduced to fake movie violence rather than gradually introduced to fake movie sex. But again, there isn't an objective truth to any of this.
I'm not sure i understand you correctly.

I mean, what exactly is inappropriate for a 4 year old? My child sees naked breasts every time mommy changes clothes.

What's the difference in that vs seeing a naked breast on the telly?

Or ate you only referring to sex?

I just don't think I understand your opinion here. I'm talking about body parts vs physical violence.
 

Dr.Morris79

Gold Member
Everything I’ve read makes it sound that the only breasts seen will be trans and non-binary…that sounds discriminatory.
Thats what i'm reading too..

Now look at everyone wanting boobs in the thread..

They want man boobs

Mans boobs...

Never seen such an outcry. Might even get mine out.

1X0GaSJ.gif
 

Power Pro

Member
Fake violence is fake, but nudity is always real. Well, sometimes it's fake, but it's still real on top of being fake.
The people who get outraged over nudity but not violence don't care if it's "real" or "fake". Just look at something like Mortal Kombat 11. I personally don't care if something is too violent, if something is not for me, I just won't partake in it, but even I had to admit that some of the fatalities in MK11 were pretty grotesque. Yet the developers of that game kept thinking the women were too sexy and covered up most of the female characters like they were wearing burkas practically. And none of those tits are "real" as you say, they're completely fake characters, but noooo we can't show any sexy ladies, but we can murder them in any number of ways.

It's so stupid that this mindset has become the norm in our society. I'm not gonna say either one shouldn't exist, but the fact that society has gravitated calling violence in all it's forms perfectly okay, while any nudity is immediately bad is stupid on a level that I can't comprehend.
 

Elysion

Banned
Everything I’ve read makes it sound that the only breasts seen will be trans and non-binary…

That‘s 100% what‘s gonna end up happening. You will be exposed to shemale boobs and the sliced up chests of FTMs, whether you want to or not, but if you‘re just looking for a nice pair of natural female mammaries you‘ll be out of luck.
 

samenamenick

Neo Member
Doesn't this policy run counter to the intent? If trans women are women, why have a split policy? As if an acknowledgement they are 2 separate things
 

supernova8

Banned
Lol you missed out the most important voting option:

"Yes but only for attractive biological women"

That's what everyone else was thinking, right?
 
Last edited:

MayauMiao

Member
As an American, our weird obsession over nudity has always been dumb to me. Hard-core violence? Yay! Bare nekkid titties? Someone think of the children!

Its only getting worse now with the obsession of using gendered words. Birthing person? Pronouns?
 
Top Bottom