www.epicgames.com
Probably because it wasn't a high prirotiy, and there was other work to do. The number of staff is finite, so what's more important gets worked on first. It's likely not common for people to have shopping carts of games to buy. Vast majoirt of people are probably buying 1 at a time. Maybe when there's promotional sales it becomes more likely but it likely won't stop people from buying.
Me too. I can add both free games at once now.
This will really come in handy the next time I won't be buying anything at that store.
With the caveat that you have to do a fortnite dance before checking out.
Hey now, maybe we can speed Carr those two free games instead of it taking so long to load each page and the confirm transaction.
This will really come in handy the next time I won't be buying anything at that store.
If your goal is to run Steam out of business, you should at least have feature parity with them. Tencent/Epic have way more money than Valve.
Their goal isn't to run Steam out of business. And disagree either way. Waiting until you have feature parity before you launch of overly investing in a bunch of developers to get as much as you can out at launch is overly expensive, risky and can is inefficient. You basically have a bunch of people stepping on each other toes and being blocked waiting for others to get stuff done. The expression in development that's throw around is "9 women can't make a baby in one month". From a business perspective Epic is not going to wait yeras to get feature parity. When they already have the minimum needed to get people to use the service. Over time, they can expand organically and build out teams to implement features faster and faster. Many of the features not there are not that important to most players.
A shopping cart isn't some risky venture, it's the most basic part of an online store. If a company like Epic has money to throw around on buying exclusives and giving away free games they can certainly add basic functionality to their store.
The Steam is doomed comments in here are obviously not serious. As for the Halo and OLED topics, guess you just strongly disagree with those takes? Those seem like pretty mild threads to me.
nobody said adding the feature was expensive or was risky. You misunderstood the post and ignore the context of the post. Spending a shit time of money to hire a bunch of people to get feature parity in order to launch at the time that they want is what’s risky.
I'm not even talking about complete parity, I'm talking about adding the most basic aspect of a storefront that there can be, it's ridiculous, but keep apologizing for these idiots.
You see. you weren't paying attention to the context and chimed in and also misunderstood the actual words in the last post even out of context.
