That 4% might translate to a difference in ~15% more pixels.
For those who do not want to understand, it is clear that they do not. LOL
And secondly you lied again... you said fornite had a 17% difference of resolution but the truth is its only a minor 4% difference and the resolution is fully dynamic..
Touryst again, you Know
more emojis and political bending of answers without providing any facts... your clearly a fanatic theres no reason to respond to ur empty noise anymore im simply wasting time and oxygen and i dont have infinite supplies..For those who do not want to understand, it is clear that they do not. LOL
I come to think that you don't even listen to what they say and you pretend to believe that they say what you want.
I invite you to play the video again
1- They are referring to recent cases after a long period where XSX used to win.
2- John does not say that the problem is the inefficiency of DX, he says that: "not sure why." That he asked developers and they told him that "MAYBE" the friendliest API of PS5 would favor those results but that there is no security.
Alex then replies and says that the most reasonable possibility is lack of optimization. Prioritize one version (the one with the largest user base) over another... but not the inefficiency of the XSX api.
They enter the case of Calisto Protocol and the reality is incontestable. The XSX version went from running at 25fps and no RT reflections, bugs and graphical errors to 30fps stuck, RT reflection (although more blurry) in less than 2 weeks. What that tells you is that the XSX version was released without decent optimization or attention, not that the API was the problem.
In short, very far from what you want to believe they say. Very far from giving you the reason. Far from claiming that DX inefficiencies. Among other things because then there would be no explanation for so many cases where XsX is the winner.
I'm not lying, it's more like you don't know how to interpret those numbers mate
There it says 4% pixels on a 4K image, it is different from 4% pixels vs the PS5 version.
But OK, right, I lied. It wasn't 17%, it was 15.1%... I beg your pardon
59% per axis on a 2160p image is 1274.39p
55% per axis on a 2160p image is 1188p
This was already discussed at the time.
Touryst again, you Know
Again I remind you of reality. It is XSX that most often has the advantage in resolution... But if you continue to lean on the more than debatable case of Touryst OK, LOL.
Jesus fucking christ dude
Why are y'all fighting so much over a game 99.99% virtually identical.
What makes you say that?
We're getting close to the middle of the generation & things are pretty much the same as it was in the beginning so it's not the tools as they was lead to believe in the beginning & they have seen enough to actually assess the hardware.
They did a video addressing the first year of the Next gen consoles but they skipped the second year so i don't know if they would do a video for mid gen. Hope they do, always fun to listen to their insight.
Both can be said to be basically identical perceptually like in most cases (still, the difference in shadows is quite noticeable here). Technically though PS5 is simply outperforming XSX slightly by running with higher quality shadows at a more stable frame rate. That's it.
IMO Raytracing has not giving anything meaningful expect performance impact.
There are plenty of games were the impact of RT is extremely noticeable. Cyberpunk is just the most recent example.
Noticeable or not, best graphical games do not have rt.
Xbox Power Meme thread.
Why are y'all fighting so much over a game 99.99% virtually identical.
Nah, Cyberpunk Overdrive has the best graphics. Feel free to disagree of course.
technically yes. it does.
I can see somebody thinking Horizon Forbidden West: Burning Shores looking better, that game looks amazing. But UC4? Hah, no.
Yes, I've played through the game four times. Twice on PS4, once on PS5 and once on PC. I love Uncharted 4, but it simply does not hang out in the same ballpark as Cyberpunk. Disregarding the fact that UC4 is a linear game vs Cyberpunk being a Megacity open world, or even the impressive RT, Cyberpunk asset and model quality is simply better. Especially if you compare in-game to in-game, Nathans model simply does not look as good outside of cutscenes vs something like Judy.Well... Sure, uc4 is static. But the end result is still striking
The object isn't a performance comparison, it's to test if you can get a console-like performance with a 2080. He didn't even bother matching settings. He just cranked everything to Ultra and dropped Effects and Shadows to Medium. We don't even know how the rest of the settings compare. Additionally, by setting it to a native 1440p, his fps shoots past 100 but with DLSS Quality which has a base resolution of 1440p, it's around 60 but it's also quite a bit more demanding than native 1440p but obviously not anywhere near as heavy as native 4K. There's probably something hitting the 2080 hard at native 4K that causes a bottleneck. Likely the bandwidth gets stretched thin which explains why they went with an 80% scale on both axis on consoles.
