Not to mention that surely few play on large screens, that they are not as sensitive to image defects or, in most cases, they know and accept what the console is and what it offers vs what XSx/PS5 are and offer.I think it's because people with an XSS actually looked at the demo themselves and are judging it individually for what it is vs. comparing it frame to frame with XSX/PS5. It's a very nice looking game, the lighting and level of detail really stand out. regardless of the resolution. Demo has a great sense of scale as well.
I think it's because people with an XSS actually looked at the demo themselves and are judging it individually for what it is vs. comparing it frame to frame with XSX/PS5. It's a very nice looking game, the lighting and level of detail really stand out. regardless of the resolution. Demo has a great sense of scale as well.
The funny thing is that he comes to censor your thought when he is in this forum the main representative of drawing conclusions and fantasizing about similar situations....... of course, only when the favored is PS5.
Rather I think the main problem is that XSX is much more affected by the issue of chip manufacturing and also adds that MS is using many of them to update Xcluod to XSeries. That's why XSX is even harder to find than PS5. Luck of MS to have had available a product appetizing to the casual user these dates because it could have been a catastrophe for them.
Bullcrap. Pc is definitely held back by console. And I’m primarily a console gamer. That said I don’t see series s causing any more problem then normal.
And thats not all, they are now doing a circle jerk pile on for a 1yr old post thatRiky made
talk about desperate times.
If I understand correctly their frame stats, they played more then 18 hours each versions ? So the entire game. I'm sure they have pixel counted every situation that looked like could be particulary significant
I dunno, alot more people have PS5s, Microsoft is splitting production between the XSX and XSS. Beside with 3rd party games the difference is largely negligible.
The video is recorded in 60fps, there are 33127 video frames, game frames are half of that.
Yeah, it's the stats of the video shown (not the total they captured, just what they edited/uploaded), 9 minutes 32 seconds, VG looks for heavier areas normally in the second half of their vids as a stress test.
stop it with your pseudo technical non sense ..pc was...IS and always will be held back by consoles...go to check horizon zero dawn 8k thread and compare it to PS5 version...or do the same with every Forza horizon releases on pc
There is no PS5 version of Zero Dawn. You mean the PS4 version?
well the thing is ...who buy the xss doesn't really care about all those things ...is mostly for casual gamers with still 1080 monitor or tv..Talking about helding back we seeing all latest multiplats games where the XsX is very very very likely to come up with the best version or get as mininum parity with the PS5 version ....if we talk about first party exclusives i think they will take care of the two console with great attention ...so what your concern about ?
that's not PC fault or it is ? i should write ..go to check the Sony first party game how to run on the latest and strongest Sony console and compare it to how it run on PC.
What are you talking about? I only said there is no PS5 version of Zero Dawn.
yes there isnt
Choose whichever has the controller you prefer.
You are right, I had a brain fart and confused second with minutes. Sorry for that
I thought it was supposed to be exactly like the series x but only at lower resolution? Did the marketing and consensus change?
What about halo infinite? Both consoles have missing features. System level support and cross console features that were supposed to be identical.
Wrong because if it wasn't for consoles publishers / devs wouldn't put so much time & money into making a PC game because they wouldn't recoup the money. Things are better now for PC because of Steam but they still need console sells to fund big games.
Yes it happen often that marketing exaggerate things or worse imagine the VRR situation with the PS5. ...it is still (xss) a fantastic entry level console
What are you referring to in particular?
VRR on PS5 was said to come at a later date. There was no concrete date, but yes, they promised on that and need to deliver. But the marketing of the s was that on a game to game basis, it would have all of the features that the x had on the same game.
Halo doesn’t support VRR properly on series x and does not support VRR or 120fps on series s.
No Jason Ronald said that it was basically up to developers, they could use resolution scaling and other visual settings that didn't affect core gameplay.
Exactly. No MS marketing promised all features on the XSS would be used in all games. It is an imaginary standard no platform has ever been held to except the budget XSS. The XSS still has features more expensive platforms lack entirely that should be addressed before jumping on the budget box.
i promise you none of the owners of the xss is interested or I have heard complaints about that pr pieceIt was. Jason Ronald made that clear when he said 'same great next-gen experience just at a reduced rendering resolution'.
It’s supposed to have identical features as the series x at lower resolutions per game. It doesn’t always.
XSS and XSX have the same features (exception is 4K). Promises made, promises kept.
Find a single post by me where I tried to fantasize about a possible ps5 superiority just for a single scene, maybe you should check better my post history before spit out nonsense sentence because not all fan act as a desperate fanboy like you which even blatantly lie because in both analyses they clearly said there aren't visible resolution difference, don't invent things please.In all modes that same scene reflects the same situation. In performance mode XSX is 60fps locked while on PS5 it drops to 45fps. I don't think saying it can be an anomaly is better or more logical than saying and wondering if it's something you could see at other times in the game. Knowing your historIial, it is clear that your reaction would have been the same as his if the situation were in favor of PS5
Also in the different analyses it is not said that there is never a difference in resolution, but that the maximums and minimums are usually the same and "similar".
PD. I want to do a statement in defense of DF and Tom in his analysis. In the other thread some only focused on questioning his conclusions, even to say that DF in its analysis avoids situations to favor XSX. Well, this video from VGTcheh gives Tom the reason in everything (also hitches in fps with the change of visor mode only on PS5) and simply is that millimeter comparisons are not always necessary and less for occasions where the frameate in both is practically blocked always.
Not on GotG and not on Halo infinite.
in this thread or in general co if that is the case it sound like a joke ahahaah
Why you don't quote a post where I ever talked about a possible ps5 superiority in a port just for a single scene mr strawman? Because it's more probable you did it in the opposite front than me lol.
