• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

DF Direct: The Price of PS5 - Are We Looking At A $500 Console?

KAL2006

Banned
I don't care how much this will cost I can pay upto 1k. However if PS5 is 9.2 TF like the digitalfoundry video used as a example and Series X is 12 TF, I would be disappointed with Sony even though I prefer Sony first party and own a PS4 over a Xbox One currently.
 

V2Tommy

Member
The irony is that people that would buy a $999 console have more money and would actually buy more games, increasing attach rate.

The opposite side is people that bought a Dreamcast for $199 and pirated all the games.

Consoles are severely underpriced for the longevity of the product.
 

01011001

Banned
The irony is that people that would buy a $999 console have more money and would actually buy more games, increasing attach rate.

The opposite side is people that bought a Dreamcast for $199 and pirated all the games.

Consoles are severely underpriced for the longevity of the product.

HA, you actually think the average player nowadays buys multiple games? nah, what these people would do is buy the 1k system and buy Fifa for it, and then buy $5000 worth of in game player packs for it.
 

HeresJohnny

Member
At one point consoles used to cost $299.
And some consoles have cost $500 and $600 and they’ve tanked at those prices. Look, if your goal is to make the next PS3 or be Xbone X then by all means..
I was under the impression Sony wants to have another 100 million unit seller on its hands.

The ceiling has been established. Maybe a console will break that ceiling someday. The truth is that even as wildly successful as the PS4 has been, it still has missed out on entire portions of the market because it is still too expensive. We tend to think we are representative of the market, but we aren’t. We just get the ball rolling. It’s the other tens of millions of people who wait for price drops that make or break a console. If the price of the machine is $100 higher at launch, it’s going to be months before it gets down to even $399.

I guess we’ll see.
 

ZywyPL

Banned
Even 499$ is very optimistic if you ask me - take the Pro as the starting point - 399$. Now throw bigger APU, more RAM, UHD BR, and better cooling - that's your X1X right there, which is 499, and is even being sold at a slight loss. And now further add even more RAM (and a newer one), SSD, possibly even bigger APU and appropriate cooling...
 

HeresJohnny

Member
Different times. Cross gen will play a huge role in this gen. As I said before, Sony will not give up PS4 when PS5 launch and probably neither Xbox. They will be selling at the same time.
Which adds even more of a barrier to PS5 adoption -- why buy a PS5 with no games for $500 or more when you can just keep playing your PS4? Is that the message to be sending?
 

Fake

Member
Which adds even more of a barrier to PS5 adoption -- why buy a PS5 with no games for $500 or more when you can just keep playing your PS4? Is that the message to be sending?
You're missing fell huge points. I not because I say 'crossgen will play a huge role next gen ' means 'next gen will not get next gen games'.
Sony already confirmed PS5 will get their exclusives for use the potential of PS5 bump hardware. I'll be there for PS5 because if at least half of the PS4 library get some sort of update to reflex the specs bumps of PS4 to PS5, will be worth anyway.

Besides, what I find funny is, the same logic apply to PC. I mean, why you need to get a better CPU or a better GPU, when you can just keep playing on your current PC?

Concluding, Sony or Microsoft should not want to 100% their actual install base to instajump to their proper next gen, but just to make this transition a little more comfortable unlike Xbox 360 to Xbox One/ PS3 to PS4. This time their have a even more structure waiting for next gen.
 
Last edited:

Roronoa Zoro

Gold Member
I miss the days of launch $199/$299 consoles just as much as anywhere else, but inflation plus the cost of tech means that shit's expensive. I guess the best solace anyone can take is that a day one purchase at $500 will get you at least seven years of usage, if the last two generations are anything to go by.
And a hell of a lot more than a $500 PC will get you. Bottom line is consoles are one hell of a bargain and if it's a big jump from PS4 I'll be happy
 

Roronoa Zoro

Gold Member
My best prediction for next gen would be

Series S: $399

PS5: $499

Series X: $599

It will all be about whether Sony gets people to look at PS5 as a bargain and very similar to series x for $100 less or if they'll look at it as a rip-off and more similar to series S
 

Flyinmunky

Member
Here in UK i'm expecting ...

£429 minimum (Doubtful but would be happily surprised)
£449 to £479 (I'm guessing it will be one of these) If the spec is excellent then i'm ok with it.
£499...At this point i know some of my friends would hold off getting one at launch. Id still bite if specs and somethings launching with it i fancy.
 

01011001

Banned
My best prediction for next gen would be

Series S: $399

PS5: $499

Series X: $599

It will all be about whether Sony gets people to look at PS5 as a bargain and very similar to series x for $100 less or if they'll look at it as a rip-off and more similar to series S

that would be the most interesting outcome. that situation would be a nice little experiment in the field of consumer choices... will the mass market go towards the lowest price, the highest specs or the middleground.
 

chinoXL

Member
Cuz they have to buy a new Iphone that'll come out around the same time.
agreed!! people wait in line for new iPhone's, pay out the a$$ and do it again the following year. a console will hold you down for years. i know they're two different markets but money spent on luxury items is money spent
 

Roronoa Zoro

Gold Member
that would be the most interesting outcome. that situation would be a nice little experiment in the field of consumer choices... will the mass market go towards the lowest price, the highest specs or the middleground.
In my profession I offer three sets of hardware at $1400, $1700, and $2000 that all get you ALMOST the same basic outcome. A few extra bells and whistles and some nice conveniences of differences but MOST of my customers pick the middle option. Another anecdote is that I just thought a Google pixel 4 for $800 when there was what I saw as a slightly better or basically the same iPhone pro for $1000 and a lesser iPhone for $700. I picked the middle option because I thought of it as the best value.
 

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
They fail to sell in numbers appreciable enough to keep software developers happy. Not enough hardware = not enough software being sold.

Sony did it with a $400 console. Not sure why $500 is impossible to sell. PLUS...........WHY THE HELL can't Sony and/or MS sell their next-gen console for $449? Is the mid way point just too dumb or scary of an idea?
 

Puskas

Member
Couldn’t care less about the price tag. I’m personally just not interested in another underpowered shitbox.
 

TGO

Hype Train conductor. Works harder than it steams.
At one point consoles used to cost $299.
Yeah and they was £299 here too
giphy.gif
 

01011001

Banned
In my profession I offer three sets of hardware at $1400, $1700, and $2000 that all get you ALMOST the same basic outcome. A few extra bells and whistles and some nice conveniences of differences but MOST of my customers pick the middle option. Another anecdote is that I just thought a Google pixel 4 for $800 when there was what I saw as a slightly better or basically the same iPhone pro for $1000 and a lesser iPhone for $700. I picked the middle option because I thought of it as the best value.

that was what I though too. the balanced middle is psychologically very tempting I bet. in your mind you think "well it's not the best one but it's still good and not too expensive"
I bet there are studies that would suggest this to be very common in many places.
 

Roronoa Zoro

Gold Member
that was what I though too. the balanced middle is psychologically very tempting I bet. in your mind you think "well it's not the best one but it's still good and not too expensive"
I bet there are studies that would suggest this to be very common in many places.
I think most people see the cheapest option as...well cheap. And when you get up high enough a $100 difference doesn't seem all that different but of course diminishing returns the higher you go. Of course we don't know what the stats are so if it were $100 between each one I honestly think it would depend on which PS5 looks more similar to when they show off games. If they look as shiney and flashy as Series X I think it would be very good for Sony. Sony has been not most powerful nor cheapest before during PS2 and PS1 so it's not a perfect strategy for beating them
 
Last edited:

Jtibh

Banned
judging from some angry/snarky replies in a couple of the next gen megathreads, it seems like a lot of people still cling to “399 or DOA.”

Im expecting 599 and hoping for 499. I don’t understand how it’s even possible for either of them to cost 399 unless being sold at a HUGE loss. I feel like it’s unreasonable to expect to mid-range gaming PC power for less than half of the price. I don’t care if it’s mobile equivalents
399?
Man i got kicked out cuz i told an idiot off cuz he was pushing for 299.

Nah you cant reason with liberal socialist hand out warriors.

In what universe do people expect 400 for a new console when it was 400 seven years ago.

Seven years ago i paid a third less for groceries than i do now.

But sure lets expect a console for 400 all while everyone is bitching about the minimum wage.
Well news flash. The more you pay for your employees the more the product will cost and i am not just talking about manufacturing but shipping and retail etc.

399 give me a break.
 
Last edited:

Jtibh

Banned
HA, you actually think the average player nowadays buys multiple games? nah, what these people would do is buy the 1k system and buy Fifa for it, and then buy $5000 worth of in game player packs for it.
I think more and more people buy multiple games given the convenience digital buy gives them with all its monthly deals.
Same goes for steam and epic.
I buy games i dont even care for if they are on a deep sale.

And if i realy want to cheap out there is gamepass.
To think about it you buy a console even at a 1000 bucks and you have 100's of games you can play for almost nothing.

Back then you bought your 200 console and spent 60 or up to a 100 for games.
 
Last edited:

Krappadizzle

Gold Member
I think more and more people buy multiple games given the convenience digital buy gives them with all its monthly deals.
Same goes for steam and epic.
I buy games i dont even care for if they are on a deep sale.

And if i realy want to cheap out there is gamepass.
To think about it you buy a console even at a 1000 bucks and you have 100's of games you can play for almost nothing.

Back then you bought your 200 console and spent 60 or up to a 100 for games.
Back then they had all kind of "platinum hits, player's choice, etc" So with your $200 console you could buy Twisted Metal 2 or Die Hard Trilogy for $20.
 

Bryank75

Banned
It really annoys me how biased towards Xbox / MS a lot of these media types are... the endless articles of how Xcloud is the future and MS have the future all sown up and Xcloud is the next big thing...... and now of course we get DF repeating this 9.2TF bullshit.

Then he goes on to say Lockhart will be a good thing... LOL. Well, if holding back the entire industry is a good thing!?
Jesus, it's so tiresome.
 

Jtibh

Banned
It really annoys me how biased towards Xbox / MS a lot of these media types are... the endless articles of how Xcloud is the future and MS have the future all sown up and Xcloud is the next big thing...... and now of course we get DF repeating this 9.2TF bullshit.

Then he goes on to say Lockhart will be a good thing... LOL. Well, if holding back the entire industry is a good thing!?
Jesus, it's so tiresome.
What ever pays their bills.

But the bias is very much in your face nowdays.

Now imagine the destruction they will cause when sony is indeed 9.2

Its safe to say df is very biased towards microsoft.
Even when sony was on top it was always downplayed by them to favour xbox.
 
399?
Man i got kicked out cuz i told an idiot off cuz he was pushing for 299.

Nah you cant reason with liberal socialist hand out warriors.

In what universe do people expect 400 for a new console when it was 400 seven years ago.

Seven years ago i paid a third less for groceries than i do now.

But sure lets expect a console for 400 all while everyone is bitching about the minimum wage.
Well news flash. The more you pay for your employees the more the product will cost and i am not just talking about manufacturing but shipping and retail etc.

399 give me a break.

ive reached a point where I just can’t wait for the official prices to be announced either way

whatever it ends up being, there’s gonna be entertaining reactions no matter what
 
Last edited:

Shmunter

Member
Platform holders are getting fat and greedy. Build it at a premium and eat the cost for mass market, make it out the other end with sales of games and accessories. The tried and tested razor blade model.

Eventually the manufacturing gets cheaper and profitable anyway.
 
You're missing fell huge points. I not because I say 'crossgen will play a huge role next gen ' means 'next gen will not get next gen games'.
Sony already confirmed PS5 will get their exclusives for use the potential of PS5 bump hardware. I'll be there for PS5 because if at least half of the PS4 library get some sort of update to reflex the specs bumps of PS4 to PS5, will be worth anyway.

Besides, what I find funny is, the same logic apply to PC. I mean, why you need to get a better CPU or a better GPU, when you can just keep playing on your current PC?

Concluding, Sony or Microsoft should not want to 100% their actual install base to instajump to their proper next gen, but just to make this transition a little more comfortable unlike Xbox 360 to Xbox One/ PS3 to PS4. This time their have a even more structure waiting for next gen.
Please trust me when I say I'm trying to come at this from as non-bias of a standpoint as I can. But are you are saying that Sony is willing to take a loss in next gen software sales but not hardware? Or are they going to take a loss on both?

The reason the prices are important to the manufacturers is that the higher the price of the next gen consoles, the lower the adoption rate will be. The lower the adoption rate, the less they will make off of software sales (the biggest money maker as far as I know.) coming from those specific consoles.

Next gen AAA games are going to cost a lot to develop if current gen AAA games are anything to go by. Less adoption rate means making less money to cover that cost.

The way to mitigate this would be to not have software that was locked to a specific console. Which is why I think MS are smart for putting their games on as many of their consoles as possible right now, even though they won't be utilizing the full potential of their machine right off the bat. And less people miss out newer games while they save up to have more bells and whistles if they want. Which to me is more "comfortable" as you put it than Sony's approach of next gen console only games.

Not to mention how this complicates the split in marketing between next gen only and current gen games. Which are you going to prioritize? Current gen, where you get most of your software sales atm? Or next gen where, if your first party games are locked, you are trying to push adoption rates to make up for the crazy amounts of money you are spending developing it's software? The higher the bar to entry the harder the ladder is going to be. So then split the diff. Either way, it's more of a risk and a money sink.

And unless I'm misunderstanding you, your analogy about PC doesn't make sense in that, your library ALWAYS comes with you and is instantly upgraded if there are settings to turn up. Which, imo, is the most comfortable of all when talking about transitioning gens.

Again, sorry if I misunderstood. I'm actually in the middle of a project and taking a break bc my brain hurts.
 

bender

What time is it?
Hope he is correct about the cooling solutions be more expensive this time around. I spend most of my time on a Playstation Pro and it gets noticeably loud during certain games (Dreams being the latest), especially when you compare it to the XBox One X.
 
Top Bottom