Halo Infinite was not developed as a launch title for Series X/S, it was just a Xbox One game that's taken a long time to develop so then they aimed to get it out for the new console launch and then do a Series X patch for it post launch. It didn't look impressive for a native next gen exclusive *because it isn't one*. It's a game that's been built around a 1.4TF Jaguar CPU 5400rpm HDD console while aiming for 60fps with an open world, and it would then run via BC on the X/S with higher resolution and better framerate thanks to the brute force of the new consoles. They even announced that the Series X patch that adds ray tracing would be coming post launch.
Infinite was never meant to be a launch title for a new console. It was meant to be a late gen xbox one game.
I just don't understand people saying sony knocked it out of the park by remastering a PS3 game, while also not giving MS props for having a dozen XB1 games ported to the new system with massive improvements.
Yet it sold out straight away, so they did pretty well wouldn't you think? MS aren't expecting any consoles on store shelves til potentially Q2 next year.
343i is not "Xbox". "Xbox" doesn't need to clean house. 343i have clearly been given too much rope, and we can see they're now being pulled back into line and cleaned up. You seem to forget that 343i made Halo 5 this generation too, and MCC. They didn't only work on Infinite.
You are intentionally playing fast and loose with language to minimize Demon’s Souls. It’s a remake from the ground up, a remaster would be The Last of Us: Remastered, i.e., resolution and frame rate bump.Demon's Souls is a remaster of a PS3 game. That's not debatable. It's the PS3 gameplay and level design and literally everything else, just with better graphics added.
Yes they launched Spider-Man etc.......but they also launched them on the PS4. You don't need a PS5 to play them. Demon's Souls can be played on PS3 and PC, the graphics will just be different.
Xbox launched with almost as many next gen exclusive games as Sony did - zero on MS's side, 1 on Sonys. Neither were great. MS had a dozen big updates to XB1 games that would classify as remasters in any other generation, they had the big AAA multiplatform games that will sell the best, and they sold every console they manufactured. They didn't need new first party games, clearly.
Did they need first party launch games to show off the console? It sold out within hours. You can't walk in to a shop and buy the console, and you won't be able to until some time early next year. That to me says they didn't need to, at all.
Again though - it sold out.Without numbers this doesn’t tell us much. The Xbox One sold well initially too, but didn’t compare to PS4 no matter how hard they tried. It wasn’t even a contest.
No, I’m not up on my 343 info, it’s all second-hand because I’m not an Xbox player. Microsoft has issues, clearly, as David Jaffe pointed out.
You are intentionally playing fast and loose with language to minimize Demon’s Souls. It’s a remake from the ground up, a remaster would be The Last of Us: Remastered, i.e., resolution and frame rate bump.
The point is that they covered the markets for sales by having different types of games for different types of players. If you were at all interested in PS5, they made sure they had a game to fit your tastes. Games on PS5 you can’t get on Xbox: Demon’s Souls, Spiderman: Miles Morales, Sackboy, Astro’s Playroom, and Bugsnax. That’s the important part because Sony sells a copy no matter which system you get it on. You’re still playing it on a PlayStation.
See above. My friends who bought Xboxes got AC: Valhalla and they weren’t exactly hyped. “I guess I’ll get Valhalla.” isn’t exactly a system seller. If Microsoft had stepped out with an amazing Halo: Infinite showing and blew everybody’s hair back, they’d be in a good position. As it stands, they hyped everyone up with trailers and then delayed it after disappointing their fans.
I don’t know why I‘m arguing this. I don’t care about Xbox.
The psychology of a fanboy is very interesting. You have managed to convince yourself that the only reason you got your new Xbox was to play old games and that it's absolutely fine to not get next generation games with your next gen console.
That's pretty impressive. You are harming your own interests because the brand you are attached to means more to you than the experiences it provides.
Yet it sold out straight away, so they did pretty well wouldn't you think? MS aren't expecting any consoles on store shelves til potentially Q2 next year.
343i is not "Xbox". "Xbox" doesn't need to clean house. 343i have clearly been given too much rope, and we can see they're now being pulled back into line and cleaned up. You seem to forget that 343i made Halo 5 this generation too, and MCC. They didn't only work on Infinite.
Demon's Souls is a remaster of a PS3 game. That's not debatable. It's the PS3 gameplay and level design and literally everything else, just with better graphics added.
Yes they launched Spider-Man etc.......but they also launched them on the PS4. You don't need a PS5 to play them. Demon's Souls can be played on PS3 and PC, the graphics will just be different.
Xbox launched with almost as many next gen exclusive games as Sony did - zero on MS's side, 1 on Sonys. Neither were great. MS had a dozen big updates to XB1 games that would classify as remasters in any other generation, they had the big AAA multiplatform games that will sell the best, and they sold every console they manufactured. They didn't need new first party games, clearly.
Do you think that maybe Phil Spencer blocked you for the same highlighted reason?
It's cute to see another Xbox thread made by and filled with Sony fans, but the reality is that without Phil Spencer, more than probably the Xbox brand wouldn't even exist anymore.
Obviously there's plenty of people here who would be rapt if the brand stopped it's existence, some even have said it publicly and claim that the space of MS should be taken by whatever other big multinational (Google has made quite the entrance in the console market).
But for people who actually care about the brand, Phil still has credit and some of his movements are unequivocally in the good direction. Of course we all wanted next gen games in the launch window of the Xbox Series X, but the fact is that Phil had to fought for the survival of the brand during the Xbox One fiasco, had to rethink and change the entire direction of the Xbox brand and had to invest heavily in it's vision, a vision that should come to fruition in the mid-long term but that has already made the Xbox Series X the best sold MS console at launch.
The Halo Infinite fiasco is the result of having to change so abruptly your path. You needed a big franchise to sell the new console in it's launch, but the reality is that the game was being made years ago for the previous console, that console that was so underpowered and that almost made the brand dissapear.
If I was in Phil's position, I would have probably launched the game anyway and call it a day, a little more time of development isn't going to change how the game looks in a substantial way anyway. But it's hardly his fault that the game looks like how it looks.
Phil has bought a lot of studios, let's wait to see what fruits they give before we kill the man. Or the brand.
Which do you think is more likely?
A-That I literally blocked you for saying a copter in Twisted Metal was a bad idea?
B-I blocked you because of the way you chose to express that specific idea?
Halo Infinite was not developed as a launch title for Series X/S, it was just a Xbox One game that's taken a long time to develop so then they aimed to get it out for the new console launch and then do a Series X patch for it post launch. It didn't look impressive for a native next gen exclusive *because it isn't one*. It's a game that's been built around a 1.4TF Jaguar CPU 5400rpm HDD console while aiming for 60fps with an open world, and it would then run via BC on the X/S with higher resolution and better framerate thanks to the brute force of the new consoles. They even announced that the Series X patch that adds ray tracing would be coming post launch.
Infinite was never meant to be a launch title for a new console. It was meant to be a late gen xbox one game.
I just don't understand people saying sony knocked it out of the park by remastering a PS3 game, while also not giving MS props for having a dozen XB1 games ported to the new system with massive improvements.
Which do you think is more likely?
A-That I literally blocked you for saying a copter in Twisted Metal was a bad idea?
B-I blocked you because of the way you chose to express that specific idea?
It's not even development time of their exclusives. Some of them still work on games they were working before purchase (Psychonauts 2, VR game from InXile) or released them recently (Wastelands 3, Outer Worlds).You can buy studios, however, development time
B-I blocked you because of the way you chose to express that specific idea?
Did Bautista block you around the same time, quite recently? He’s now in gears 5, so that could point to almost a company wide block list controlled by some media manager or something.Perhaps; it would not surprise me and I would totally understand if he did.
Thing is, I don't care if the guy blocks me or not. Not cause 'fuck him', just cause I never followed him and don't know him personally so it's just, 'Ok...'
Hell, I'm genuinely kinda annoyed Dave Bautista blocked me. I think he's funny and cool and I dig his politics and I've never in my life had an interaction with him so who knows what that went down.
No, voters should remain impartial . that said we know you're rightDo I get to vote too?!?!?
If they only made 30,000 consoles and sold out, that’s not impressive. Again, without numbers, we don’t have much.Again though - it sold out.
what did you want it to do, sell out more than it already did? Your friend still bought one even with being not hyped for any games, so why does it need a “system seller” when the system sold?!?
This isn’t hard to understand. It sold out without an exclusive “system seller”. It can’t have possibly sold any more consoles than it did. The second wave is also sold out. What would having halo as a launch game have accomplished sales wise for the console?
Do you get me? Your friend is the perfect example of what I’m saying - MS sold him a console that he supposedly didn’t even want any games for. That shows that they didn’t need a big exclusive first party game to sell the console, doesn’t it? Lol
davidjaffe hasn't made a good game since God of War so clearly he is in the wrong. <--- this is sarcasm, Phil is wrong.
Although I do think his original planned ending for GoW3 was pretty awesome.
The Twisted Metal game on PS3 was pretty great and underrated .
Depends on your gaming preferences. Card system for multiplayer games is an ace where quick resume fails.Absolutely agree.
Quick resume, paired with the SSD, is the best quality of life feature this gen. It’s revolutionised how I play. Quick level of Streets of Rage 4, hop in to a race or 2 on Forza Horizon 4, fly in to Halo CE’s campaign and complete a level before jumping back in to where I left Fallen Order.
Having to load a game from scratch, even on the SSD, almost feels archaic already.
It’s incomparable to the PS5’s card system and anyone that says otherwise is kidding themselves.
Can you expand further on that please? I don’t own a PS5 yet.Depends on your gaming preferences. Card system for multiplayer games is an ace where quick resume fails.
On PS5 you get cards to launch directly into matchmaking type, e.g COD team deathmatch or domination, etc.Can you expand further on that please? I don’t own a PS5 yet.
In Gears 5 for example, I can just leave the game on the matchmaking menu, then when I start the game using quick resume I literally just have to press A once and I’ll be matchmaking.
Guessing on PS5 you can just launch the multiplayer directly from the UI?
Since they patched quick resume after week 1 or 2, this no longer happens. Same for Forza Horizon 4. It takes about 3 seconds to reconnect to the server, but it doesn’t boot you out of the matchmaking screen any more, it happens in the background.On PS5 you get cards to launch directly into matchmaking type, e.g COD team deathmatch or domination, etc.
If you suspend on Xbox and resume you get the lost connection, reconnecting, then needing to navigate through the game menus to select match type.
On PS5 you get cards to launch directly into matchmaking type, e.g COD team deathmatch or domination, etc.
If you suspend on Xbox and resume you get the lost connection, reconnecting, then needing to navigate through the game menus to select match type.
3 seconds to connect to cod server? Wow, definitely not the case on PS5.Since they patched quick resume after week 1 or 2, this no longer happens. Same for Forza Horizon 4. It takes about 3 seconds to reconnect to the server, but it doesn’t boot you out of the matchmaking screen any more, it happens in the background.
That’s right, when you suspend a multiplayer match on Xbox everyone else suspends also and you resume right where you left off! Xbox....power your dreams!Bullshit. Doesn’t happen to me at all.
Also, those cards need to be configured by the Developers. Some will chose not to configure those.
With Xbox the dev doesn’t need to do anything at all.