The Old Hunters is one of the best DLCs ever made, and Ludwig, the whale sharks, and The Orphan of Kos says you weren't overleveled.
I actually think this slightly different than the usual rumor, better sources.Ah yes, monthly bloodborne resurrected news.
On the other hand if From Software is busy who else than Bluepoint could do it properly ?Bluepoint have proven their technical capabilities, not creative - handing them something as big as a Bloodborne 2 on a silver platter could be a real disaster.
On the other hand if From Software is busy who else than Bluepoint could do it properly ?
Plus being sequel cuts them a lot of work
Bloodborne with the density/graphics of Demon Souls PS5 would be something else
60FPS and some updated visuals would be tasty
I see lots of words here but all i'm getting is nonsense?Another souls game....jesus. DS is old as hell and looked like trash so fair enough for the remake but really, this is what you want another souls title to be wasting time on that came out a few years back for the PS4?
Get that guy to let sony use his method to get 60fps so you can all shut up. Bloodborne looks more than fine as is.
I think it’s both since we were told they are making a remake and original content. It makes perfect sense.Remaster or Sequel? Either way, people will find a reason to complain probably.
But they used the same code for the actual game, no?You’d like to think that Bluepoint’s experience with rebuilding DeS from scratch would mean that this would be something a bit more than just a 60fps, 4k up res job. A full remake would be too much, but I’d like to see something more between the two. Make the double dip properly worth it.
Heard it before a billion time, I'll believe it when I see it.
Since Moriarty is not a clown, however, in the chance that this is true I hope they do a quick remaster rather than a full Demon's Souls-style remake. Bloodborne is not that old, if they up the resolution, make it run smoothly at 60fps, maybe upscale some textures somehow and improve the lighting and sfx departments a bit, it will be more than enough. If they start rebuilding map and character assets form scratch, 1) it will take them forever and 2) there are zero chances people won't complain because they messed too much with the style and atmosphere.
EDIT: Well Lance said it as well, so I'll start believing it's actually real.
This. With Demon's souls remastered they have shown both Sony and From Software they could do a worthy BB remaster. But it's very probably (and hopefully) not going to be BB2.They proved themselves with Demon Souls. Now they've given them Bloodborne.
But they used the same code for the actual game, no?
I thought they simply rebuilt the assets and visual aspect?
Either way, they did a great job so would do BB justice. That bloody frame pacing….
I see lots of words here but all i'm getting is nonsense?
Bloodborne with DS Remake engine... would be megaton.
I assume PS5+PC 4K 60fps remaster with some extra sauce and content. And then after it a sequel if From Soft are too busy if they prefer to do something else after Elder Ring.Remaster or Sequel? Either way, people will find a reason to complain probably.
Idk if From Software owns the engine, I was under the impression it was developed during the Bloodborne production so its possible Sony co-developed it.
Edit: Idk, I know it was called Phyreengine but Lance McDonald tweeted this so I’m even more confused now:
Nowt wrong with wanting a great game made better. As for them making their own game, thats a massive gamble. We'll see though.After 4 years you want a remake of the same game? How low are your gaming standards. If they are doing more remakes Id rather it be something that actually would benefit like DS has. For example the rumored MGS 1 remake. Also, BP need to spread their wings and actually work on their own IP. A bunch of talented people there, they shouldn't be known only as a studio that does remakes.
FTFYRemaster or Sequel? Either way, people will find a reason tocomplainbe concerned probably.
If is remake or remaster I WILL SAY that is too soon for that.Remaster or Sequel? Either way, people will find a reason to complain probably.
I am ok with a sequel and Miyazaki being the producer.Maybe its a remaster as theres really no reason they should remake a PS4 game…. That would be a waste
Also the only person who should make a sequel is Miyazaki. Not interested in anyone else making a sequel. DLC over looked by Miyazaki is fine
Ive already spent close to 300 hours in Bloodborne, so I dont think I will start again
Its why I bumped the other thread when I did he isnt the only one talking about this and I knew it was going to come back to lifeHe's been right about things before and isn't the kind of guy who'd just make things up, so if he's saying this it's either real or he somehow got fed bad info.
I’m not so sure I want a Bloodborne REMAKE in 4-5 years - I really wish they’d just give the game a 60 FPS patch so we could all move on with our lives
I think it’s both since we were told they are making a remake and original content. It makes perfect sense.
Yeah exactly, so maybe. The solution is a port with significant additional content, collaborating with From/Miyazaki.If is remake or remaster I WILL SAY that is too soon for that.
If is a sequel o presequel the people will say WHERE IS MIYAZAKI??!!