Since when is that an argument? It's pretty evident how lacking the game is and how much it falls short from all the promises.
Sure, "shallow" and "unbelievably bad". Give me games that let me do shit like this, all in the same game:
So...it sold like 13M in its first 10 days...and 7M during its next 2 years with huge discounts to the point you can buy it for 10 bucks?
"OMG game system bad"
First of all, you only unlock all possible endings in a single playthrough if you have the completionist mindset - at which point roleplaying is out the window, if you look up a guide or if you fall into the 5% of players that will naturally do it.
I don't like the game, you show me the same game and now you want me to praise it?"OMG game system bad"
>Look at these multiple fun and varied playstyles
"buh buh something npcs....! HAH, GOTTEM"
I think this case is closed
Not liking something is easy, hate is cheap in this world of ours. Have you got criticism though? That's got to be backed by logic. If you said you didn't like the game because if doesn't give you options, then his answer is completely valid.
You're free to not like it. But you didn't say "i don't like it", you said the systems are "shallow" and "unbelievably bad" which i proceeded to demonstrate as clearly false claims.
The slang in the game certainly sucks.
whether it's Cyberpunk or Skyrim they're galaxies apart from The Order, in pretty much everything, i assure you...
Now that's a funny stretch (in the context of the topic). He calls himself a developer, but AFAIK he hasn't at any time actually worked as a professional game developer for any company. It seems to me he's been unsuccessfully looking for a game developer job for, what, the past 7 years..? Point is, he's a nobody, and in the end there's no more weight to his arguments about Cyberpunk 2077 than the rest of us.
no chance of that happening. i'd love for it to happen but it'd be a lot of work. they'd need lots of new animations, make changes to the map, and change interactions with characters. best we can hope for is that someone does a Redmod or that they design the sequel with 3rd person.
anime and a sale will definitely have brought in more players
I'll do that right after you write me a 3 pages essay on why you dislike to eat paint.
Trash this trash that, you seem to be hanging out a lot here for some thread all about "trash." Move on.
I haven't followed the hype and always see this lies thing being throw around. But whenever i try to look into what they lied so much about all i get are either nitpicks about minor mechanical changes or very personal interpretations on vague statements like "the city is alive!".
are you aware of how marketing works? you sure don't seem to be. marketing is legalized lying. you're either young or hasn't been paying attention your whole life.
Are you for real? That's how you are going to simp for CDPR?
I'm not the one falling for marketing traps so I don't consider myself the simp here... but whatever helps you sleep at night, I guess
Varied sure, but not everyone likes dishing on braindead AI enemies. Having decent AI that responds to player action/prompts player reaction is part of engaging gameplay."OMG game system bad"
>Look at these multiple fun and varied playstyles
"buh buh something npcs....! HAH, GOTTEM"
I think this case is closed
Agree with most of what you said, but they can have it like the old Fallouts, just go back into 1st person during conversations. Combat will need a lot of work though yeah. Still... what could be...
Not for me. Maybe if you grew up with PC gaming. Gaming interfaces have never been good enough for me to feel like I'm in the game with my own body. The 2d screen. The distance I sit from it. The clunky KB/mouse/controller that in no way approximates natural human movement. Can't suspend my disbelief. It's much easier to believe I'm puppeteering a character inside a world than pretend I'm in it myself. That's why CDPR's whole "more immersive" spiel was bunk. It's so subjective.
Yeah, the dlc need to have some glorious leg cyberware other than charged jump and double jump, wall running would be neat.
If you don't get what is wrong with lying about a product to dupe people into buying it then massively underdelivering... you really don't get it.
They have pre specified spots and routes, they'll detect you if they hear you, get spotted by a camera or if they see you - on a side note, its interesting they decided to not make enemies blind like stealth games usually do, prob cause there are more ways to elude them - when they enter combat they'll spread out and shoot at you, get behind cover, try to flank you, throw grenades if you're behind cover or shoot at you with smart weapons, melee based enemies will try to get close to you, snipers will well snipe, and netrunners will hide and try to hack you by getting a line of sight, often through cameras. As a cool touch, when most of the enemies have been defeated, the remaining ones get extra careful, getting distance from you when you get close and staying behind cover more often.
Absolutely. If there is an option for 1st person, I generally tend to prefer it. Even in games like GTA5 or RDR2, I feel it's just more immersive walking around in 1st person (Granted, the shooty bits work better in 3rd person however).
Honestly I think anything is better than “behind the ass” camera.
For some people, the ass is a huge selling point tho
I'd say it depends on the ass
The trick to solve all of this, at least on our end, is stop pre-ordering games and buying into hype. It's so easy to wait a few days and check reviews. People are so worried about missing out.
