the little brother of XSX lockhard has RTX and PS5 not?
Megatron
from marketing standpoint Sony can tell:
we have now the most powerful lastgen console.. not bad at all.
most powerful is most powerful... no one can tell anything to that.
So they're both using RDNA1 according to you?
It implies GCN
This is a really obtuse hot take.
But if AMD is lying MS could be lying too.
Of course it makes sense, AMD is capable of cross-generational hardware feature implementation, they do it all the time.
RDNA2 is an evolution of RDNA. RDNA2 is still using RDNA technology. So they could both use RDNA2, we just don't know yet.
What contradictory beliefs am I holding? You don't even know what cognitive dissonance is, you just thought it sounded appropriate lol...Cognitive dissonance - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
I'm also not a narcissist, I'm a believer in accuracy and nothing more.Narcissistic personality disorder - Wikipedia
They won't be using the exact chips, Microsoft already said they've done customization to theirs so by design it will be different.
Gifs and laughing emotes to facts? Man you guys are really disconnected from reality, you've completely lost the plot.
Yes indeed, one of them did do that! And since they're both confirmed by AMD to be using THE LATEST RDNA TECHNOLOGY, what does that tell you?
Yes indeed, one of them did do that! And since they're both confirmed by AMD to be using THE LATEST RDNA TECHNOLOGY, what does that tell you?
The gift is pretty accurate in that case.
I already addressed this, try to keep up small fry.Yes indeed, one of them did do that! And since they're both confirmed by AMD to be using THE LATEST RDNA TECHNOLOGY, what does that tell you?
I'm telling you that AMD confirmed what Sony already said. That they're using RDNA2, which is why they have hardware accelerated raytracing built into the GPU hardware. As per Cerny's own words.
Yes, there you go! Now ruminate on how utterly asinine your assertion is!
He will accept... the hard way but he will accept.Yes, there you go! Now ruminate on how utterly asinine your assertion is!
That you honestly think that they'd make some RDNA1/2 hybrid with all the features of RDNA2 is absolutely hilarious. And, well... deliberately obtuse.
No, they won't eat crow.....If tomorrow Sony out right says....."We are using RDNA2".....They will just say Sony wasn't clear about it before.....Just check these guys responses to raytracing, it's the same thing, they said "Sony only said raytracing, they never mentioned hardware raytracing like MS did".....That little argument spanned days, weeks and months...….I'm pretty sure some are still not convinced when Sony and Cerny have highlighted it a million times....This new argument?... Rinse, repeat...
Then.... why isn’t Sony just saying it lolYes, there you go! Now ruminate on how utterly asinine your assertion is!
That you honestly think that they'd make some RDNA1/2 hybrid with all the features of RDNA2 is absolutely hilarious. And, well... deliberately obtuse.
They don’t need at all.
Yes, that is exactly what I would say because I'm not saying it's one or the other, do you follow?
Their website just says it's using RDNA tech. Never says one way or the other.
Their website just says it's using RDNA tech. Never says one way or the other.
But we know XSX is RDNA2, so if AMD says both are RDNA2, then that confirms PS5 is RDNA2, because it's part of that "both" where we know one is RDNA2. It's logic. Try it sometimes.
No one is saying AMD is lying we simply don't know the implication of exactly what that means. It's heavily implied but it's not a confirmation of the exact hardware makeup.
No, see the above.
>AMD says both
Well you finally half accepted the reality.
"Is it 1.0 with all the features they needed to create 2.0 to be able to implement?! We just don't know!"
We don't know what 2.0 brings to the table beyond VRS and RT, it could be much more. Stop acting like you're in the know, you're not."Is it 1.0 with all the features they needed to create 2.0 to be able to implement?! We just don't know!"
