Yeah, Peter O'Toole, Joan Fontaine, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Roger Ebert, James Gandolfini, Ray Harryhausen, etc.
Not related to movies, but Lou Reed because he was fucking Lou Reed.
Drugs can make you even more happy. If drugs just made you feel bad nobody would be doing them. They are dangerous because they can be really fucking great to take.For what possible reason would he be using drugs? He seemed so happy.
He only appeared in the second film. And he was good, as usual.ЯAW;99333815 said:Indeed. And even if the guy wasn't all ways in quality movies he still did amazing job. I haven't seen any of the Hunger Games movies so can't say how he was in them.
For what possible reason would he be using drugs? He seemed so happy.
Um... what?This is awful. I think he had 3 kids and a wife as well? Thoughts go out to their family.
I'm sad that Hunger Games will be his last movie ever. Also I know they finished filming Part three: Part one, but I wonder how much he was able to get finished for Part Three: Part 2.
I can't believe we won't get to see all of the fantastic roles he would have played as he continued to age.
The world is a lesser place.
Drugs can make you even more happy. If drugs just made you feel bad nobody would be doing them. They are dangerous because they can be really fucking great to take.
Um... what?
Wow, I had no idea he was only 46. I thought he was at least in his late 50s.
One of my favorite underrated roles of his was in Charlie Wilson's War, a reasonably entertaining movie, that he carried to another level in every scene he was in. Guy had so much talent, he could the entire range from comedy to drama. God, there are so many great roles he could have played. What a loss.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQ_4m2ocxhI
Not surprising, considering that he has had problems with drugs for over 23 years....it's very sad though. Drugs are terrible for your health.
Wow, I had no idea he was only 46. I thought he was at least in his late 50s.