The game is in Early Access. They got a cool 1.2+ million in sales and will monitor how the game does over Seasons 2, 3, and 4.
You know I think you make a lot of solid points and I actually agree that live service, improving a game for years until it evolves into soemthing else, the idea inherently is incredible and in many ways better than a one and done single-player.
Hell, I love what Chinese Gacha and even Roblox are doing. Destroying the traiditonal AAA via free-to-play, all platforms and eternal live service approach.
I have even said this many times, Sony's live service was never the problem, its them not playing to their stregnth, people are only going to buy stuff that excites them, regardless whether its live service or single player.
But what I don't get is backing this obvious failure of a game. Like are you going to back other generic games that Sony is making that are obviously going to flop (fairgames, Horizon)
simply because they're live service?
You can be a champion of live service, hell go against the opinion of other people here, thats a trait I always admire,
but why not pick which games you're going to back? Back Valve's next live service game, Back Marvel Tokon, Back the brilliant Neverness to Everness, back the next gta online, back the next Arc raiders, back the dozen indie/AA/non-American live service games that become a phenomenon on Steam and you can flip all of these old geezers off when they all do big numbers, but why back just any live service solely for being live service? Why back this greedy hollow shell of a company with one foot on a banana and the other in a grave?