That's what your attitude towards him reveals when it bothers you when someone agrees with him even when he definitely is right
In a rational world, your concern should be directed at the person who claims something untrue in order to fabricate a narrative, but you prefer to go against the one who questions it for the reason we all know.
Because we all know why Adam annoys so many of you here...It's certainly not because of his attitude and behavior (which is generally healthy and respectful and much better than that of many who go around calling others "Shills" for not agreeing with them), it has more to do with his preferences.
I defend a person who is right about something. You attack him even when you know he's not wrong... It's up to you to figure out what makes the most sense to do...
I only came in to make this comment... That's exactly what's going to happen in practice.Watch the 25% more become 10% less because they need to run the Win11 experience
PS2 and PS3 aren't good hardwares, they're difficult to program due to complex architecture, especially the PS3.
Arrogance got them in the end. Still, the games that came out in the latter half of the PS3's lifecycle more than made up for it imho.
I just have to realize what kind of nonsense this guy is writing.
If I followed his logic, the console would have to be 25% more powerful than a 5090 if the PS6 already reaches 5090-level performance.
Now, imagine what an APU with better 5090 performance would even look like. You can't achieve that with even the smallest nanometer process or architectural change. Utter, unrealistic nonsense.
Listen, is not that hard.
Honestly? More console than PC, yes.
If you keep moving goal posts nothing is hard fam ...
You can forget about 1000$ price...this will be a 1500$ console....Omg, I need to know the price of this thing now!
And you think that these will not be trading blows given the state some games release on PC?
A 5080 alone cost that much.
Project Helix is 25 Percent Faster Than PS6, Sony Unlikely to Delay Console to 2029 – Rumor
The PS6's chip is also noted as being considerably smaller than the one in Project Helix, making the latter more expensive to produce.gamingbolt.com
With Microsoft having recently taken the first steps towards officially unveiling its next-generation Xbox, a new report by Moore's Law is Dead has offered more details about the differences in hardware between Project Helix and Sony's PS6. One of the biggest differences between the PS6's AMD Orion and Project Helix's AMD Magnus chips is their die size. While the former is believed to come in at 280 mm-squared in area, fabricated on TSMC's 3 nm process, the latter will seemingly have a much larger die, coming in at 408 mm-squared thanks to its combination of a 144 mm-squared SoC (system on a chip) and 264 mm-squared GPU. This also means that Project Helix will end up being more expensive than the PS6, since its chip is pricier to manufacture.
Another difference is how the compute units between Magnus and Orion have been set up. PS6 will seemingly run on 54 RDNA 5 compute units for its graphics, and 8 Zen 6c cores paired with 2 Zen 6 low-power cores dedicated to handling the operating system. This was, according to Moore's Law is Dead, reportedly gives a 20 percent boost in CPU power available for running games, when compared to the PS5's CPU which didn't have dedicated cores for the OS. Project Helix's Magnus, on the other hand, doesn't seem to have low-power cores. Rather, its CPU consists of up to 3 Zen 6 cores paired with 8 Zen 6c cores, while its GPU will have 68 RDNA 5 compute units.
Ultimately, the CPU powering Project Helix is noted as being more powerful thanks to its inclusion of Zen 6 cores, compared to the PS6's Zen 6c cores. However, the difference isn't expected to be too large between the two consoles when it comes to overall performance.
As for the GPU, Sony is reportedly targeting clock speeds of 3 GHz, which will result in performance of around 40 TFLOPS (trillion floating point operations per second). It is theorized to be capable of triple the rasterization performance of PS5, and up to 12 times the ray tracing performance. The Magnus chip powering Project Helix, however, is expected to be around 25 percent faster than the PS6 on paper. However, how this will play out in practice remains to be seen.
As for when these consoles might actually come out, Moore's Law is Dead expressed a belief that Sony is unlikely to actually delay the PS6. He noted that, while there are logistical issues that might drive up the cost right now owing to memory shortages and skyrocketing RAM prices, the company has dealt with similar issues just a few years ago, when the pandemic-induced lockdown caused similar problems with supply chains. To that end, he expects Sony to stick with its planned 2027 launch window, or maybe even push the console back to early 2028. However, a delay to 2029 is noted as being unlikely since it would cost the company more to disrupt its plans than it would to eat the inflated costs and launch the console as previously planned.
It depends on whether Zen 6 will clock higher in Magnus than Zen 6C in PS6 and how much faster it would be. I do not think PS5 was held back by a completely redesigned FPU / VFPU pipeline in Zen 2 for example. Now Zen 6 LP sure, but that is for the OS.
But 8 is an improvement from 6.5 cores in PS5. From 13 threads to 16 threads available to developers. And the thread will be much more potent with Zen 6. The vast majority of PS5 games were GPU limited, not CPU limited.
This but more importantly what SneakersSO said about Helix.
MS about it:
Thanks mate. I missed that. So potentially could mean API overhead and less control over system level optimisations?
Is this philosophy?
PS6 Pro in 2031 with God of War Next.
They are, especially with Unreal 5 games. It's more about if a developer takes the time to use the console power, sadly with PS being the lead platform for years, you don't see many 3rd party really making full use of the system, same goes for some of Xbox In-House teams mind.
What are you on about? It is PC hardware, so you get NO lead development at all. You have no hope, zero. Xbox has to pay the price of getting every PC port by losing custom 3rd party games. This is because they were going to have many games skipping the Nexbox if it was a conventional console. That is the PC tax all PC gamers pay. Badly made ports.
![L*][*N*K](/data/avatars/m/842/842515.jpg?1780503950){kind=avatar}
