• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Microsoft CEO: Xbox Series X|S Has Outsold PS5 in NA for 3 Qtrs in a Row. Sales tracking ahead of 360.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hendrick's

If only my penis was as big as my GamerScore!
This thread is meaningless, Sales don't mean Jack because PS5s are still sold out. All this means is that MS was able to get more Xboxs (especially the series S) on store shelves, that's it, nothing else. It has absolutely everything to do with supply and nothing to do with demand. /Thread.
So all these people buying Xboxes are going to abandon the ecosystem once PS5s are more readily available? What an idiotic take. Every Xbox sold where a PS5 is not brings the install base closer together. That means everything.
 

conpfreak

Member
At some point, the supply chain excuse for Sony underselling PS5s is no longer acceptable. Microsoft and Nintendo have largely figured out how to get stock up and reaped the benefits of doing so. I'm not buying Sony is helpless because of their failure to navigate current market conditions well enough.
 
Last edited:

Chukhopops

Member
They have to reach their 18m target for this year somehow. I expect stock to be really good throughout the year.
I believe the opposite, right now it’s decent but it’s going to be more difficult around October because of higher demand.

From the Verge article Sony will have to produce and sell +/- 5m over each of the next two quarters to reach the target. If they manage that it would be quite impressive compared to the current production trend.
 

PaintTinJr

Member
So all these people buying Xboxes are going to abandon the ecosystem once PS5s are more readily available? What an idiotic take. Every Xbox sold where a PS5 is not brings the install base closer together. That means everything.
Are you suggesting that all those people that have bought an XsS that will eventually get to buy a PS5 in NA are going to buy 4TF versions of games instead of 10TF in the future?

The userbase number is only relevant to software sales(and services) going by PS3/360 and PS4/X1 gens, and if the PS5 in those Xss households becomes the console where software is bought, that influences where devs prioritise their efforts first and the diversity of games on each platform, and so becomes a PS5 only owners, PS5 + XsS owners + some XsX & PS5 owners versus XsX only, some PS5 + XsX owners, and XsS only owners.. With going by PS5 versus XsX sales suggests the left side will be a much bigger userbase than the right - or possible equal at best in NA, IMHO.
 
Last edited:
At some point, the supply chain excuse for Sony underselling PS5s is not longer acceptable. Microsoft and Nintendo have largely figured out how to get stock up and reaped the benefits of doing so. I'm not buying Sony is helpless because of their failure to navigate current market conditions well enough.

If only they made a weak console as well...

Too bad they didn't think about it...
 

Topher

Gold Member
At some point, the supply chain excuse for Sony underselling PS5s is not longer acceptable. Microsoft and Nintendo have largely figured out how to get stock up and reaped the benefits of doing so. I'm not buying Sony is helpless because of their failure to navigate current market conditions well enough.

The last NPD showed PS5 going from third place to second behind Switch in units sold so it could be they have already made adjustments to increase production.
 

Kagey K

Banned
I believe the opposite, right now it’s decent but it’s going to be more difficult around October because of higher demand.

From the Verge article Sony will have to produce and sell +/- 5m over each of the next two quarters to reach the target. If they manage that it would be quite impressive compared to the current production trend.
I think guidance changes next quarter. They are obviously going to miss that number.
 

DaGwaphics

Member
Be honest - how many of you fuckers sleep with your console of choice?


Not me.

Bill Murray Christmas Movies GIF by filmeditor
 
At some point, the supply chain excuse for Sony underselling PS5s is not longer acceptable. Microsoft and Nintendo have largely figured out how to get stock up and reaped the benefits of doing so. I'm not buying Sony is helpless because of their failure to navigate current market conditions well enough.
Yep
 

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
What they did was release 2 SKUs. A powerful one for hardcore and wants the best, and a second one that will play the same games but less details etc.

This is not called weird it's called smart. Just like AMD and NVIDIA. Release a 3080 and a 3060. Increase your audiance based on their budget. Not everyone can spent a 600$ on a console after tax.

Some people want a console that plays the latest games for their kids ( guess what console my 7 years old has ? Yup it's an S) my son doesn't care about 4k, he care about fortnight and rocket league etc.

MS also can lower the price of the S at one point to a 200$. I mean, that is the sweet spot for a console to win user base.

It would be weird if this same company didn't care about console hardware sales at all. My point is, I believe MS "DOES" care about console hardware. Hence why they made two skus for the reasons that you stated.
 

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
What are you taking about? You seem to be clueless. The xsx regularly comes in and out of stock. Not so much with the ps5. So ms IS doing a better job of meeting demand with their supply. Not sure how you can argue otherwise... simple supply and demand

I wouldn't view the XSX as often in stock. The real game changer for stock issues is the XSS. But you are also ignoring the fact that Sony had way more stock during the launch window. So to act as if Sony should have made their own version of the Series S is laughable.
 

//DEVIL//

Member
It would be weird if this same company didn't care about console hardware sales at all. My point is, I believe MS "DOES" care about console hardware. Hence why they made two skus for the reasons that you stated.
They are even planning a cheaper alternative . Like a USB stick that you plug to TV and play games. Or like the recent Samsung TV Xbox app. MS. Will release various options for you to play Xbox games using Xbox game pass/ cloud. Not just 2skus
 

Lognor

Banned
I wouldn't view the XSX as often in stock. The real game changer for stock issues is the XSS. But you are also ignoring the fact that Sony had way more stock during the launch window. So to act as if Sony should have made their own version of the Series S is laughable.
Well if they had they would have sold more PS5 consoles. It's that simple. The Series S is the reason the Series consoles have sold as well as they have. Sony is struggling to manufacture enough PS5 consoles. The discless version is not any easier to manufacture, certainly not like the Series S. A Series S type of PS5 would have done wonders.
 

Woopah

Member
Response:
The 3DS, 2DS, new 3DS and 3DS XL had different abilities but they were still part of the same generation.
For sure, PS5 will not lose 1st place in Europe to Xbox, but Xbox will make inroads. Console gaming is growing, same as with PC gaming. Industry keeps getting bigger!
PS5 is currently second to Switch in Europe. That could change in the future.
I love how "good Xbox news" is gaming revenue being down 7 % and hardware sales being down 11 % year over year. Talk about low expectations in life. I have to wonder what would be considered as bad news at this point.

And I know times have been tough for the green team, but partying about stock levels is kinda sad.
It's still the second highest Q4 for Xbox. So not as good as last year but still a good result for them.
 

HeisenbergFX4

Gold Member
I wouldn't view the XSX as often in stock. The real game changer for stock issues is the XSS. But you are also ignoring the fact that Sony had way more stock during the launch window. So to act as if Sony should have made their own version of the Series S is laughable.
I know a couple of people now who could not find a PS5 and bought Series S instead simply because it was in stock and they couldn't be happier
 

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
Well if they had they would have sold more PS5 consoles. It's that simple. The Series S is the reason the Series consoles have sold as well as they have. Sony is struggling to manufacture enough PS5 consoles. The discless version is not any easier to manufacture, certainly not like the Series S. A Series S type of PS5 would have done wonders.

But they didn't want to split their userbase in that way. Which is smart for Sony. Don't forget that VR is a part of their Playstation business. A Series S-like powered console wouldn't work well for Playstation.
 
No, the reading problem is on your end.

No I literally had the word "myth" along with the claim of S being the leading sales consoles, which is false, had nothing to do with the PS5, you can't read.

Xbox Series S is not supply constrained,
Your own quote literally says Series X, are you doing any reading at all? I never said anything about the S in that quote.

I just addressed it.

No you didn't, you addressed the same post you didn't read correctly before. The PS5 situation is a completely different argument, stop being lazy, click the link, read the post, and respond. You'll see you haven't addressed a thing in it.
 

Lognor

Banned
But they didn't want to split their userbase in that way. Which is smart for Sony. Don't forget that VR is a part of their Playstation business. A Series S-like powered console wouldn't work well for Playstation.
Yeah that's a good point about VR. A lower powered console might not be able to support it. But I still question PSVR and it's viability. I'm not confident Sony can grow that market and make it profitable. Their resources imo are better spent elsewhere. VR has been on the market for years now and it's still extremely niche. The best selling VR headset has been relatively cheap (soon to be more expensive which is likely to be detrimental to its continued success) while PSVR2 will have a HUGE barrier to entry. $500 PS5 and then a headset that is going to cost probably at minimum $400. So $900 all in to play PSVR2. I don't see a huge market for that. But that's an argument for another thread.

But again, good point on how a series s type of console would conflict with psvr2 possibly.
 
You’ve typed a lot of words that are besides the point. Lets keep it simple.

Premise 1. Ps5 is still supply constrained overall including NA.
Premise 2. Ps5 has had a bigger supply of units than XS over the last quarter (if not also higher demand).
Premise 3. XSX is shipping much more % of its supply to one market (NA) than it’s supply limited but broader geographical competition the ps5.

The conclusion follows necessarily regarding that region…

Didn't address a single thing in my post, which was primarily focusing on NA and other regions with similar results. You clearly couldn't address the post so skipped it and then spun the topic. How about actually addressing the post?

If that's the case why did Microsoft almost abandon the Xbox brand after its disaster of a launch?
This never happened.

That’s a small price to pay to tie you to their ecosystem. And it’s very likely that most folks with Gamepass will stay and resub when their 2 years run out.
How are they supposed to sell you storage cards if you have 1TB?

Some of you act as if people are forced to buy Series S, and that's why Xbox is doing so good.

If I was in the market for PS5, then Series S or X availability would mean nothing for me.

That's like saying - "yeah, I wanted RTX 3080 but they only had GTX 1060 on the shelf so I bought that instead".
I wanted an HD console with clear graphics and Gears of War or Ratchet Tools of Destruction, but I decided to get a white Gamecube rectangle with jaggies and waggle stick for $50-$100 less with games I have no interest in because it was all that was there.

what?

Today they call it a "family" of consoles,
Ths has actually been going on since 2008 starting with PS3/360
 

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
Yeah that's a good point about VR. A lower powered console might not be able to support it. But I still question PSVR and it's viability. I'm not confident Sony can grow that market and make it profitable. Their resources imo are better spent elsewhere. VR has been on the market for years now and it's still extremely niche. The best selling VR headset has been relatively cheap (soon to be more expensive which is likely to be detrimental to its continued success) while PSVR2 will have a HUGE barrier to entry. $500 PS5 and then a headset that is going to cost probably at minimum $400. So $900 all in to play PSVR2. I don't see a huge market for that. But that's an argument for another thread.

But again, good point on how a series s type of console would conflict with psvr2 possibly.

I'm pretty sure VR is already profitable for Sony. At a small margin of course. And to me, their resources are best spent on things that they are good at. They are the only video game console maker on planet Earth that supports VR. So they have that market cornered.

It may take 10 more years, but VR is just as much here to stay as streaming video games is.
 

PaintTinJr

Member
Well if they had they would have sold more PS5 consoles. It's that simple. The Series S is the reason the Series consoles have sold as well as they have. Sony is struggling to manufacture enough PS5 consoles. The discless version is not any easier to manufacture, certainly not like the Series S. A Series S type of PS5 would have done wonders.
But that is an oxymoron, no? because they wouldn't be PlayStation 5's. I also suspect the XsS was actually meant to be the low, PS5 to be mid, and XsX to be high tier for the gen - with Xbox expecting 8TF from PS5 - only to find that it was 10.3TF/s, and not just a regular 10TF, but one with vastly more pixel-rate than their XsX, and efficiency with smartsnift and their new paradigm pro-active deterministic fixed power variable clock system, that regular sees the PS5 trade blows easily with the XsX in these - native, but - still cross-gen software times.

A current PS5 is still running games like HFW with hardly any difference to discern gens from base and Pro PS4, how would a 5TF, PS4 Pro Enhanced help PlayStation gamers, or the market. PlayStation was hardly in a rush to leave the last gen when you consider the bangers like Death stranding, Ghost of tsushima, FF7 remake - as Gaf would say - they were releasing on base and pro right up until the PS5 released. Many native PS5 apps are still in competition with the best looking exclusives on PS4 Pro IMO, so an RDNA 2 PS4 Pro wouldn't help get more PS5s to people at all, would it? and would help lift the visuals above Spiderman remastered, would it?
 

PaintTinJr

Member
Is this another attempt to claim the XSS isn’t a next gen console?
Genuine question, how does the XsS in a household where a gamer has both an XsS and PS5 only, compete for Microsoft - in a next-gen way - for sales of mutliplatform game's licensing money - where games have price parity, and aren't part of a marketing deal with exclusive content or on PS+/gamepass?

Under normal circumstances would anyone bother checking a faceoff between a 4TF AMD GPU and a 10TF AMD GPU of the same gen? Surely to be next-gen - by more than being described and marketed that way by Xbox - it has to actually be able to compete for multiplatform sales of next-gen games too, no?

Completely fine if don't agree, by the way.
 

kiphalfton

Member
This is pure bullshit. There is literally not a single game that runs on X that is not in S. Its just a lower spec version.

We don't really know how many of each unit was available for sale. However, we do know there has been extremely high demand this past year and they've been getting snatched up as soon as they're available. Meaning logic would dictate if they both sell out almost instantaneously and one console has more sales than another, that there were more XSS/XSX on the market vs PS5 disc/digital.

Now if stock wasn't limited (let's assume inifinite stock for the sake of simplicity for both consoles) and the XSS/XSX managed this feat, that would be a whole other matter.

Really what matters is the ratio of # produced and # sold for each console, to come to a solid conclusion.
 
Last edited:

kiphalfton

Member
So all these people buying Xboxes are going to abandon the ecosystem once PS5s are more readily available? What an idiotic take. Every Xbox sold where a PS5 is not brings the install base closer together. That means everything.

Talk about an idiotic take, Mr. Straw Man.

He never said anything about people abondoning the Xbox ecosystem once PS5's become more readily available.
 

ManaByte

Gold Member
Genuine question, how does the XsS in a household where a gamer has both an XsS and PS5 only, compete for Microsoft - in a next-gen way - for sales of mutliplatform game's licensing money - where games have price parity, and aren't part of a marketing deal with exclusive content or on PS+/gamepass?

Under normal circumstances would anyone bother checking a faceoff between a 4TF AMD GPU and a 10TF AMD GPU of the same gen? Surely to be next-gen - by more than being described and marketed that way by Xbox - it has to actually be able to compete for multiplatform sales of next-gen games too, no?

Completely fine if don't agree, by the way.
It’s a fucking next gen system. This is absolute bullshit.
 

DaGwaphics

Member
@ PaintTinJr PaintTinJr it's not always that linear. I had a PS4 and a X1 last gen and purchased all my third party games on Xbox, regardless of the 50% performance advantage. For me, Xbox was just the superior ecosystem that I felt would better serve my digital purchases over the long haul (across multiple generations). PS was just an exclusives box for me, nothing more, nothing less. Peoples opinions can be based on a lot of different things. The target buyer for XSS probably isn't the buyer that's playing across all consoles (If you are going to drop a grand on PS+XSS+Switch you might as well spend the extra $200) but the budget player that will only have the one device and doesn't want to spend $500. For others, maybe they like the small size. This is an old survey, but I'm sure even today the number of players with just a single console is far greater than many think. https://www.gamedeveloper.com/pc/npd-72-of-u-s-plays-games-only-2-3-own-multiple-consoles
On this board, most people have everything I'm sure, but this is an enthusiast board after all. With that said, the users that MS does get that are PS5 focused and pickup a XSS for console exclusives are customers they wouldn't have had at all. Maybe they utilize GP as their medium for accessing the first-party content, that's a win for MS.
 

The_Mike

I cry about SonyGaf from my chair in Redmond, WA
Has a game Sony ever had a big marketing deal with ever gone to gamepass day 1?
What does that have to do with anything lol.

You guys are acting like Sony is so terrified of game pass that they put a "must not come to game pass" requirement in any contract lol.

I doubt Sony gives a fuck about Microsoft having a game on game pass day one when there's three times as many PlayStation users.
 

Hendrick's

If only my penis was as big as my GamerScore!
Talk about an idiotic take, Mr. Straw Man.

He never said anything about people abondoning the Xbox ecosystem once PS5's become more readily available.
No he said that these sales were meaningless, which they clearly are not. Try again.
 

PaintTinJr

Member
It’s a fucking next gen system. This is absolute bullshit.
I don't get your angle of not wanting to counter my point. An easy rebuttal would have been that "the market decides!", and in NA - as it stands - they've decided it is exactly as Xbox have stated, that it is a next-gen system.

My rebuttal would then possibly be that the market is still to decide, and we'll see when the number of households in NA (and further afield) where a PS5 is bought after a XsS, and then we see the relative market share by digital/physical software sales, and subs.

I don't dispute it is released as a next-gen system, but for my miniscule contribution to the market deciding, I disagree personally, but am happy for everyone else to agree with Xbox, if that's what they've done.
 

ManaByte

Gold Member
I don't get your angle of not wanting to counter my point. An easy rebuttal would have been that "the market decides!", and in NA - as it stands - they've decided it is exactly as Xbox have stated, that it is a next-gen system.

My rebuttal would then possibly be that the market is still to decide, and we'll see when the number of households in NA (and further afield) where a PS5 is bought after a XsS, and then we see the relative market share by digital/physical software sales, and subs.

I don't dispute it is released as a next-gen system, but for my miniscule contribution to the market deciding, I disagree personally, but am happy for everyone else to agree with Xbox, if that's what they've done.
It has nothing to do with the market. It’s a next-gen system.
 

PaintTinJr

Member
It has nothing to do with the market. It’s a next-gen system.
I don't think Xbox themselves would agree with that, but if you are attached to how it is marketed, that's fine...however there's a slight double standard in the marketing, no? They don't believe in generations, so it could be next-next-gen too,, but now take issue with anyone like myself that disagrees with them, and says it doesn't meet my criteria to be a next-gen system for me - or my vision of the games market's next-gen.
 

Poop!

Member
Series X is regularly available direct from MS. People just don't think to check there.

At first I saw this post and thought “this guy is full of shit” so I checked the MS website and low and behold the Series X was/is in stock. I was looking for a Series X as my kids are hogging my launch Series S.

Thank you for the tip internet stranger!!!!
 

CatLady

Selfishly plays on Xbox Purr-ies X
I don't get your angle of not wanting to counter my point. An easy rebuttal would have been that "the market decides!", and in NA - as it stands - they've decided it is exactly as Xbox have stated, that it is a next-gen system.

My rebuttal would then possibly be that the market is still to decide, and we'll see when the number of households in NA (and further afield) where a PS5 is bought after a XsS, and then we see the relative market share by digital/physical software sales, and subs.

I don't dispute it is released as a next-gen system, but for my miniscule contribution to the market deciding, I disagree personally, but am happy for everyone else to agree with Xbox, if that's what they've done.

It is not up to the market to decide. It simply IS a next gen console.
If you want to claim it's not, please proof by the means the Mods require from Nydius Nydius in their ban message to prove otherwise.
[+Multiple] You were warned yesterday about this garbage. If you would like the ban lifted earlier please provide evidence of a 'next gen' game playable on XSX but not XSS.
 

PaintTinJr

Member
Stop bullshit. Seriously. It’s a next-gen console.
We have examples of all the current platform holders in the past - and ones that have left and amazon, etc - where the market has told them no, or forced them to change their stance. Xbox most recently in the previous gen had to ditch X1's DRM, they had to ditch their mandatory pack-in kinect because the market said no.

Yes it is a next-gen system because they say so, but "the market decides!" as a maxim still isn't invalid because of that.

edit:
For CatLady CatLady 's benefit, I'm obviously referring to my view of next-gen with the word "viable" implicit in there, which as you say, they've released it as a (genless) next-gen system, so wikipedia in years to come will always refer to it as part of this gen.
 
Last edited:

ManaByte

Gold Member
We have examples of all the current platform holders in the past - and ones that have left and amazon, etc - where the market has told them no, or forced them to change their stance. Xbox most recently in the previous gen had to ditch X1's DRM, they had to ditch their mandatory pack-in kinect because the market said no.

Yes it is a next-gen system because they say so, but "the market decides!" as a maxim still isn't invalid because of that.
It’s a next gen system because it has the same CPU and RNDA2 GPU as the Series X.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom