To a degree, but generally people have a lot of inertia. Give them a reason not try something new and most won't bother.
That would make some sense if you couldn't disable the DualSense Haptics and Adaptive Triggers. So it just seems half-hearted and greedy.
Nah these kiddies like their controllers because they get super strong aim assist from the game. The game does the aiming for them. No skill involved. Can't ask them to use mouse/keyboard. They get reamed 4 ways to Sunday.
Try thinking a little more critically about this and you'll see why the Dualsense is required (despite being able to turn off the features) — his point is still valid. What you really need to understand (and I know you won't) is that the DS4 is absence of those features, there is no turning them off, it just doesn't have them. Turning them off on the DS5 does not remove them from the controller and the default isn't set to "off" (do some reading about smart defaults or settings that are default and how often people change those).
It also includes the most convenient and probably most used way of experiencing Tempest. Coupled with the included mic and mute button that helps ensure people who play online games have a convenient way to communicate and can use their own headphones. Now when you play PS5 games online you know everyone has a mic and devs know they can put effort into features that aren’t diluted by DS4 users.
www.google.com
You are absolutely right.
what does that have to do with anything I said?Phil Spencer compliments DualSense and suggests Xbox could update its controller | VGC
“We kind of look at some of that and [think] there are things that we should go do”…
They are both ~ 70 bucks in my and other european countries, but we are going in circles. I have not even the slightest doubt that Sony just did this to milk the customers who already bought additional controllers. Most of them will do it again if they have to and Sony knows it. You think differently. That's fine.
Yes, we're going in circles and I knew this in my first response (the reason why the "you won't" comment). Saying they did it for the money is just a silly thing to point out. Ofcourse they did it for money. That's the entire reason PlayStation even exists. Sony wants to make money with PlayStation. Isn't it their most profitable business? Not sure why people think this is going to be some dig or way to put down something. Sony and Microsoft aren't running a charity or a non-profit.
Yes .. all two games.
When they move to a similar upgrade like the dualsense you can check out if your statement holds. Until then, they’ve basically released the same controller for generations.
Read my post in that thread. Of course all games are compatible. That doesn’t mean they use DS specific features. I can only think of two games I’ve played that use haptic in meaningful ways and pressure triggers that are not just basic rumble.
Beginning a conversation with " i know you won't understand" is an unfair and unreasonable argument in the first place. I and everybody ever having a conversation could use that, but it doesn't make sense. We just have different opinions and that's it. I'm not the only one saying it's all about the money. Maye we are all not intelligent enough to understand your farsightedness, but i have my doubts. That's it from me, have a nice day.
That is the sweatiest clench I've ever seen lol
Then why can you remote play Ps5 games with a Ds4?
So your statement was trolling through anecdotes. Got it.Read my post in that thread. Of course all games are compatible. That doesn’t mean they use DS specific features. I can only think of two games I’ve played that use haptic in meaningful ways and pressure triggers that are not just basic rumble.
Obviously the new DS works with ps4 rumble calls so the opposite wouldn’t be that far fetched. Any haptic specific just translates into solid rumble and just ignore pressure triggers as no dev besides Sony uses those anyway.
I've just had this conversation before and know how it was going to go. And no worries if you don't want to continue since we both made our points but the last thing I will say is, saying it is about the money....is just silly because that part is obvious — it is about money and it is also about support. Just because you develop something does not mean all games will support it 100% but if you can guarantee anyone playing will be using Dualsense, that's a better argument for the two audiences that need to be convinced and not everyone will be (for reasons that should now be obvious) and that is also how Sony can make that 'money' they want.
Oh shit, where?!
The bigger issue is that as far as I know there is no 3rd party Dual Sense controller options either. They own the only store you can buy digital games as well. So it is another area where Sony is the sole provider of something for the PS5. Not sure how other companies can get by allowing customers options for controllers but it would be cool if Sony followed suit. There are better ways to make money than taking away choice from customers.
Dual shock 4 was the first good controller they made, they wanted to make money this gen so they introduced a gimmick that they could brainwash people into "needing" so they sacrificed battery life and possible innovation of standard back buttons/paddles for a ton of plastic that fights you when you try and use it. To cement this awful controller they made it mandatory to use it otherwise nobody would buy one.
Then what’s the point? The whole point is for the features to Not be ignored.
Wrong
You just jumped the shark.
You can still buy keys on sites like eneba.
There are and they are more expensive. What would be the point in a dualsense alternative? Saving $5-$10 for lesser quality?
