• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Digital Foundry: PS5 vs PC in Assassin's Creed Valhalla

Leyasu

Banned
I don't see the point of this to be honest. DF seem to be cashing in on the comparison vids of late because they are starting have some competition in this space.

But in the grand scheme of things, these new consoles are pretty fucking great for the price. Everyone should be happy.
 

sleepnaught

Member
I've been a PC gamer for 25 years now, but the value proposition has gotten so bad these last few years. With Sony's lightening fast loads times and great performance, I'm thinking of not bothering to upgrade my PC. Things would be different if PC had some AAA exclusives worth upgrading for, but there isn't. I think the RTX 3000 launch fiasco was the straw that broke the camel's back for me. I was looking to upgrade my PC, but half the parts I need are completely sold out and don't look to replenish anytime soon. May as well just get a PS5 and be done with it. At least that's only one thing I have to order.
 

Mr Moose

Member
bCX0xlR.jpg
Ew, Windows 10 Home?
 
I'm not engaging in you anymore. I've given you valid objective reasoning and you are now just bashing me just because you disagree. Believe that every developer is a dummy and needs to "master" the same API they used in a previous generation all you want to make you feel like the PS5 has more "power" to be had above what is already being done. I look forward to the native 4k/60FPS games with RT enabled.

if what you’re saying is true then UE5 will be impossible to run on PS5 since devs have already mastered the hardware at launch...
 

VFXVeteran

Banned
Difficult? I thought it was impossible as pc does not have deals for mass hardware aquisition like console makers and no subsidy. And also because no one should expect to buy a much more usefull machine for the same price.

Ubiport. Nothing new for their games.

Why is it that every PS gamer thinks that you have to rebuild a new PC to compare to a console? This is fallacy already. most people build PCs 1x and keep the original hardware for years and years. It's the GPU that changes with each generation. The PC has use way beyond a console.
 

VFXVeteran

Banned
if what you’re saying is true then UE5 will be impossible to run on PS5 since devs have already mastered the hardware at launch...

What are you talking about? Epic has PS5 and look what they did before it even launch. It's not about mastering it. It's about learning some of the custom things it can do like the I/O. The rendering aspect of Lumen and Nanite was being made as agnostic techniques (i.e. independent of platform and on PC) years ago.
 
Last edited:
Why is it that every PS gamer thinks that you have to rebuild a new PC to compare to a console? This is fallacy already. most people build PCs 1x and keep the original hardware for years and years. It's the GPU that changes with each generation. The PC has use way beyond a console.
I sometimes even do tick-tock upgrades. Cpu one year, gpu the next. Sometimes just MB+RAM. You don't needa buy everything, each upgrade unlike what these lunatics think.
 
Based purely on TFs the PS5 should perform at the level of a 2080 so this isn't surprising. Yes, the 2080 Super is stronger but it's about 10% difference. No doubt the PS5 is a great value but nothing here was unexpected.
 
What are you talking about? Epic has PS5 and look what they did before it even launch. It's not about mastering it. It's about learning some of the custom things it can do like the I/O. The rendering aspect of Lumen and Nanite was being made as agnostic techniques (i.e. independent of platform and on PC) years ago.

then why don’t we see any games that look as good at launch?

no shit new rendering tech takes a while to develop...

so you agree with me that we will see dramatically better looking games in the years to come they take much more advantage of the hardware than the launch games..
 

rodrigolfp

Haptic Gamepads 4 Life
Why is it that every PS gamer thinks that you have to rebuild a new PC to compare to a console? This is fallacy already. most people build PCs 1x and keep the original hardware for years and years. It's the GPU that changes with each generation. The PC has use way beyond a console.
Well, people that do not have anything of a pc have to build from nothing. My next upgrade will be case (mine is still from 2004 LOL), cpu, MOBO, VGA, RAM an maybe SSD. This will cost me more than 1000$
 
Last edited:

Mr Moose

Member
Why is it that every PS gamer thinks that you have to rebuild a new PC to compare to a console? This is fallacy already. most people build PCs 1x and keep the original hardware for years and years. It's the GPU that changes with each generation. The PC has use way beyond a console.
You didn't get those parts for free.
Unless you stole them 👀
 

Hezekiah

Banned
Why wouldn't they?

A 2080Ti it's already outperforming the PS5, and that GPU looks like a mid tier GPU compared to a 3080, much less a 3090.
To be honest a 2080 Super right now is only mid-range if you believe Nvidia's proclamations.
 
Last edited:

thelastword

Banned
PS5 is a foliage BEAST........No wonder it rendered a whole gen worth more foliage over XBOX in Dirt...

All that custom hardware and the cache and a single pool of memory. PS5 is proving itself to be the bandwidth king.......And to think, the cache scrubbers are not even in place yet, neither is the faster IO being used to push even higher texture settings yet through HBCC......

Even more to that, in the scene where PS5 fell to 51 fps, it was performing much better than that, without as much tearing......So technically, PS5 can perform even better.....I do think PS5 is pushing the best clouds and the fire comparison seems to be a resolution difference vs a higher setting tbh....
 

CrustyBritches

Gold Member
Why is it that every PS gamer thinks that you have to rebuild a new PC to compare to a console? This is fallacy already. most people build PCs 1x and keep the original hardware for years and years. It's the GPU that changes with each generation. The PC has use way beyond a console.
At first these results were exciting, but when comparing to AMD hardware the luster wore off quickly, so then the price comparisons come up.

The comparison I'd like to see is a R5 5600(non-XT) paired with 6700(XL, max OC) with SAM enabled on AC Valhalla vs PS5. That's a good RDNA 2 36CU vs RDNA 2 36CU matchup. Once hardware shortages slow, this is something a person would actually build brand new.
 

Hezekiah

Banned
You just said it yourself. The hardware doesn't change. The engines do. In 5 years games will look better because more efficient engines and techniques. But in 5 years I can buy a new 5060ti for 400 that will make the same ps5 games look like dog shit. That hardware is fixed and maxed right now. Engines are what changes.
That's silly. Does the release of the 3060ti suddenly mean that the Last of Us 2 or Ghosts of Tsushima look like dog shit? 30fps games sure, but running on consoles with seriously underpowered CPUs unlike the PS5.

As a Playstation and a PC owner, I'm not sure why PC owners need to hold this veneer of disdain any time people talk up console performance.
 
So we can expect the PS5 to perform roughly on 2080 - 2070 level? If true, thats not bad. A huge jump from previous consoles, that launched with outdated specs.
 
AC: Valhalla is a bad game to compare PS5 to the nvidia graphics cards, It's more optimized for AMD GPUs than Nvidia ones (which is not the case for most games).
Look at this benchmark: https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pag..._graphics_performance_benchmark_review,6.html
The RX 5700 XT does almost as good as the RTX 2080 Super on ultra 1440p (59 vs 60 so -1.7%) while doing +3.5% better than the RTX 2080 and +11% better than the RTX 2070 super. While on average the RX 5700 XT is 6% slower than the RTX 2070 super in 1440p:
 

Mister Wolf

Member
That's silly. Does the release of the 3060ti suddenly mean that the Last of Us 2 or Ghosts of Tsushima look like dog shit? 30fps games sure, but running on consoles with seriously underpowered CPUs unlike the PS5.

As a Playstation and a PC owner, I'm not sure why PC owners need to hold this veneer of disdain any time people talk up console performance.

There is nothing impressive about a game running at 30fps.
 
Why is it that every PS gamer thinks that you have to rebuild a new PC to compare to a console? This is fallacy already. most people build PCs 1x and keep the original hardware for years and years. It's the GPU that changes with each generation. The PC has use way beyond a console.

This feels too much like a simplification, though. PC gamers get new hard drives, SSDs, RAM, change the CPU, motherboard... there's lots of things we have to upgrade over time besides GPU, nevermind you may need to upgrade things like power supply and such. You can still be incredibly cost effective and get good mileage out of your parts but it's a much more complicated dance than just buying a console.
 

rodrigolfp

Haptic Gamepads 4 Life
AC: Valhalla is a bad game to compare PS5 to the nvidia graphics cards, It's more optimized for AMD GPUs than Nvidia ones (which is not the case for most games).
Look at this benchmark: https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pag..._graphics_performance_benchmark_review,6.html
The RX 5700 XT does almost as good as the RTX 2080 Super on ultra 1440p (59 vs 60 so -1.7%) while doing +3.5% better than the RTX 2080 and +11% better than the RTX 2070 super. While on average the RX 5700 XT is 6% slower than the RTX 2070 super in 1440p:

shhhhhhh. let some fanboy warriors have some happiness.

There is nothing impressive about a game running at 30fps.

Wrong. There is one impressive thing. Games being deliberately made to target mediocre 30fps.
 
Last edited:

Bogroll

Likes moldy games
I'd like to see more comparisons with other games, until then it's a case of The Emperor's New Clothes.
 

Bo_Hazem

Banned
I've been a PC gamer for 25 years now, but the value proposition has gotten so bad these last few years. With Sony's lightening fast loads times and great performance, I'm thinking of not bothering to upgrade my PC. Things would be different if PC had some AAA exclusives worth upgrading for, but there isn't. I think the RTX 3000 launch fiasco was the straw that broke the camel's back for me. I was looking to upgrade my PC, but half the parts I need are completely sold out and don't look to replenish anytime soon. May as well just get a PS5 and be done with it. At least that's only one thing I have to order.

Get PS5 and upgrade to PS5 Pro by late 2023 with 72CU's and the best games possible, it should even outperform 6900 XT by then when built on 3-5nm with higher frequency. It should be priced at $500 as well by then.
 
That's silly. Does the release of the 3060ti suddenly mean that the Last of Us 2 or Ghosts of Tsushima look like dog shit? 30fps games sure, but running on consoles with seriously underpowered CPUs unlike the PS5.

As a Playstation and a PC owner, I'm not sure why PC owners need to hold this veneer of disdain any time people talk up console performance.
Sorry I'm exaggerating greatly to fit in. That wasn't what I was trying to say anyway. My bad. I'm counting this silly notion that the ps5 will get more powerful over time. If it performs like a 2060-2080 now it will also in the future.
 
Getting an RTX 2060 for half price a couple months after launch is basically fantasy land for most people

Edit - Just noticed you said canada, so now it just sounds like complete bs
There are literally hundreds of overstock/return auctions in North America daily. Be patient and you will find incredible deals. I built 3 computers everything but monitors for just over 1000$ Canadian. The worst one being a 2600 in a b450 with a 1060 6gb. Over a year ago.
 

SlimySnake

Flashless at the Golden Globes
I've been a PC gamer for 25 years now, but the value proposition has gotten so bad these last few years. With Sony's lightening fast loads times and great performance, I'm thinking of not bothering to upgrade my PC. Things would be different if PC had some AAA exclusives worth upgrading for, but there isn't. I think the RTX 3000 launch fiasco was the straw that broke the camel's back for me. I was looking to upgrade my PC, but half the parts I need are completely sold out and don't look to replenish anytime soon. May as well just get a PS5 and be done with it. At least that's only one thing I have to order.
the fact that they are selling an entry level card like the 3060 for $399 is absolute Nonsense. These x60 cards used to go for $200 while the x70 cards went for $300-350. They have almost doubled the prices for these cards over the last decade or so.

Meanwhile consoles are still targeting $399-499 and offering so much more.

I was also looking to upgrade but it seems i will also have to upgrade my cpu and the latest amd cpus are going for $449 minimum. I remember when amd was the more affordable option selling mix range cpus for $150-200.

It's great that amd is doing well now but it seems the performance costs are being passed down to consumers by both companies.
 
Last edited:
a true beast in a crossgen title

in actual nextgen games 2 years from now will reach medium at best

you know it's true, like it's been for past generations
 

rodrigolfp

Haptic Gamepads 4 Life
the fact that they are selling an entry level card like the 3060 for $399 is absolute Nonsense. These x60 cards used to go for $200 while the x70 cards went for $300-350. They have almost doubled the prices for these cards over the last decade or so.

Meanwhile consoles are still targeting $399-499 and offering so much more.

I was also looking to upgrade but it seems i will also have to upgrade my cpu and the latest amd cpus are going for $449 minimum. I remember when amd was the more affordable option selling mix range cpus for $150-200.

It's great that amd is doing well now but it seems the performance costs are being passed down to consumers by both companies.
So much more? Tell us how are they offering more whatever resolutions, framerates, controllers, mods, emulators, exclusives, annoying graphic settings to disable, etc... Because I will run now like Bolt to get one.

ACO_1440p_Ultra.png

Assassins-Creed-Valhalla-CPU-benchmarks-2.png


Not a huge difference but still a few fps here and there.
Point me the CPU usage in the game while being well optimized in these graphics because I am failing to see.
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member 17706

Unconfirmed Member
I'm running the game on a 3900x and Vega 64 with a mixture of settings at 1440p and while I'm using the adaptive resolution mode to get a mostly locked 60 FPS... yeah, I think I would definitely have benefitted from getting this on PS5! Beast of a system at the moment, especially considering how hard it is to even get the latest gen of GPUs.
 

SlimySnake

Flashless at the Golden Globes
So much more? Tell us how are they offering more whatever resolutions, framerates, controllers, mods, emulators, exclusives, annoying graphic settings to disable, etc... Because I will run now like Bolt to get one.
eh i don't want get suckered into a pc elitist argument but the consoles this time around are widely considered to be far more powerful than their predecessors were at launch. The cpu and ssd were lacking last gen while this time around they are far more capable than the 1.6 ghz netbook cpus found in the ps4 and x1.
 

thelastword

Banned
Let's also not forget about the person that created the Digital Foundry Tools - Craig Linneman

GyM4rBj.png
He always goes under the radar, but he has been responsible for pitching lots of defense shields for MS...."I heard it's the tools", well ok, and the XBOX bandwagon ran with it.......Again to nothing. Oh, the lower performance in AC is a bug.....Wait for the patch, only for Ubisoft to do what we all know they had to, decrease XBOX resolution to 1188 and even as low as 1080p according to Vgtech to boost framerates on Series X and to minimize tearing......Yet they all felt, it was only a bug and the "former artist formerly known as the world's most powerful console", would be patched up and outpace PS5 in settings and performance at 4K native locked 60fps......It's the tools man.....

Has anyone actually verified the xsx can do 12 TF ?
XSX is less performant in more aspects of the GPU over PS5......Higher clocks is greater than more CU's on the same RDNA 2 architecture....The problem with Series X is that apart from PS5 having higher clocks, it also has many other customized designs on board that quickens rendering at the GPU, CPU, Mem and IO level....You look at the PS5 design and they have 1up'd the PS4 design with it's 20Gb/s bus that connected CPU. GPU and MEM closer. PS5 is a whole other level in that design in how they have positioned the APU, the memory config with the SSD chips soldered onboard....The gains you will gain with all the communicating members so close knit will be extraordinary, when it comes to speed and rendering.......As Cerny said, don't expect PS5 to hit it's stride yet, it's only the beginning, those 12 gates on the IO DMAC, that sound SPU, those cache scrubbers are going to do things you can never replicate on XBOX.....Then the geometry engine is equivalent to the Exotic setup of the PS3 or the VU's on PS2, the GE with cache scrubbers and HBCC through the IO will do things that even the new Ampere GPU's will struggle to do in realtime.......Again, PS first party will continue to dominate this gen, but even moreso to how fast and performant the hardware is with lots of room left to squeeze out more and more as time passes....

Yup, but we dont have to hear about it in every single thread.
This is a tech thread, it's all about discussing the minute details....If you want to discuss gameplay, I'm sure there are a million vacant OT's where no one will impede on if you are having fun with 69% meta games or lower performance multiplat games...Here we discuss the tech, like we have been doing since millennia....What console has the better effects, the better performance, the better lighting, AA, AF etc...

I remember a time XBOX fans were so sure that they would dominate multi's at a landslide level, they all anticipated third party games as a time when they would beat their chests, they called a 40-50fps uptick over PS5 at 4k native, whilst PS5 would struggle at 1440p or even planted FUD as far as 1080p below 30fps on RE8 vs 4K 60fps on XBOX........Many chants on "the world's most powerful console", "8TF at best for PS5", upon spec reveal, they could not even agree and discuss the actual PS5 spec, they wanted to chop PS5 down even more, so they came in packs from the discord, singing the same harmony and fud-hosannas, many were banned for the 9TF OC'd spiel, they didn't even want to give PS5 it's 10.23TF credits......Even DF is in disbelief and dishing out content like a dripping pipe in the Sahara.....They were all involved in the fake hype instead of looking at the specs and discussing it in a realistic and professional manner......So many guys wanted SSD threads closed, the next gen thread closed, they didn't want to hear reason, that PS5 was simply faster on many levels over Series X, it's a shame that a tech outlet behaved that way and were the chief ones propagating "World's most powerful console" as if they were the most tethered to Phil's umbilical. So in typical fashion, XBOX fans clinged unto DF's 8TF at best videos, no hardware raytracing, no ML, no VRS, no 1440p, Sony has shown Nothing, we are not going to do a PS5 breakdown video, and of course their legendary "XBOX has more 120Hz games over PS5"....XBOX fans clinged unto these spiels and PR fellating pieces as flies on rice......Meanwhile, level heads were discussing the real deal in the next gen tech thread, pulling up all the figures and extrapolating what we could expect in realtime vis a vis the the different engineering profiles of these consoles.........So in the end, sound reason, not obfuscating detail and truth wins......Breaking sticks in your ears, has no effect on reality and results....
LOL What?! Are you fucking kidding me?

Did you see the state of this forum after Road to PS5 dropped? You could barely hold a decent conversation regarding any of the specs of both consoles without being trolled relentlessly by an Xbox fan.
There are many examples of people just trying to discuss specs (without any fanboy ism) and you'd have the thread thrown into disarray because some Xbox fans entered to remind you of the 12TF monster Xbox and how the PS5 is going to suffer against the power king.
This happened daily in multiple threads and was one of the reasons I took a short break from the forum.

So please, kindly STFU with that noise. There wouldn't be any gloating if it wasn't for the endless months of trolling from camp XBOX.
Amen, smacking post.....It's like you are Zeus dishing it out from Mount Olympus.....

Did you know that those clowns were begging for 9TF comment to not be bannable in the ban review thread? They were extremely aggressive with horde mentality and now you find them crying and acting "mature" to ease the pain of all the backfires of Microsoft's lies and FUD. :lollipop_tears_of_joy:
Yeah, it's so funny seeing all the..."The MS guys have had enough, let's be mature about it", Where was that maturity in the Next Gen thread or in any thread where were trying to discuss the SSD, the console spec, the controller, the tempest Engine......It was all bombarded with suicide bombers and Discord lemmings.

The worse thing is when, people come in hard and are relentless and unwavering in their FUD ands evil, reminds me of game of thrones, but when judgment times comes to them, they are so quick to ask mercy......It is only then they want to turn a new leaf or see the need for peace and civil exchanges......PS guys are not even bothering XBOX guys as they have done us. Trying to get us mass banned, using likes, laughs and triggered as a war tool, using Discords to plan how they would attack forums in droves....Even now, no PS guy, even cares, we are just happy that we have the best console as we always anticipated and are discussing the findings in these tech threads.....You think if XBOX was winning these faceoffs, even if it was not the 20-60% uptick they anticipated, they would be calm and Kumbaya about it.....They would be defacing Cerny's name right now, boosting their meme power threads and calling Jim Ryan a hack, so this fake "let's discuss this civilly" is unwarranted, because no PS fan is harassing any XBOX fan, we are just discussing and highlighting the superiority of PS5 in these multiplat games.....better foliage, better effects, better resolution, better framerates....This is no coincidence to those who paid attention to reason and logic.....


Oh and, one thing I have seen and maybe commented on before.....In as much as they say the next gen thread was a Sony safe space, we all discussed and learnt much there, many receipts were presented and good discussions ensued.....I remember going to the ban thread off and on and the hate and vitriol by mostly XBOX fans there was unsettling, it was their safe space, it was where many of them came to congregate to pent out their anger towards Sony fans, that and the Meta thread, and it's also where they went to ask for the closure of the next gen thread, suck up to mods and constantly ask for the bans of many Sony fans.....In essence, it was their safe space, Sony fans could not even go and ask for a pardon for a member without being harrassed and overtaken in responses and emoji responses by the same set of ban thread dwellers, instead of allowing us dialog with the mods on the issue, members who act like they are mods, would rush in and always write up a nothing piece as if they are so elevated.....It's a ban thread, allow members to have dialogue with the mods on pardons for members without all the bombardment and clutter........What's funny, it's the same guys who asked clemency for permed members who constantly insulted and harrassed other members on this forum.....So the hypocrisy is real here......These same members never spoke out against all the FUD that the Discord and MS group were pushing, but people are just discussing the tech, which shows all PS wins and now, they want us all to say "it's negligible", "they are like for like".....No they are not....No one is harassing anyone in these threads, we are just discussing the tech, where in the PS3 days a 40P difference was a world away better on the 360.....
 
Someone explain why everyone is creaming their pants. The PS5 performs like a 5700 (non XT, mind you), essentially as expected. What am I missing here?
 

rodrigolfp

Haptic Gamepads 4 Life
eh i don't want get suckered into a pc elitist argument but the consoles this time around are widely considered to be far more powerful than their predecessors were at launch. The cpu and ssd were lacking last gen while this time around they are far more capable than the 1.6 ghz netbook cpus found in the ps4 and x1.
All true, but pc gaming is far from being only about performance. If it was then would not make any logical sense to play there.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom