Fanboys never learn from their mistakes.
Exclusive PS5 4k screenshot:
You lost me on that reply.Looks like you made a lot of fanboy mistakes in your post.
You lost me on that reply.
After years of tech understanding/engineering/architecture analyses. I like to think I understand things at a deep level.
From what I have seen from public showings, and also some behind the scenes stuff. I feel the XSX will be around 35% more capable.
I can see XSX being native 4k(2160P), and PS5 being dynamic 4K(1440-1800P). Might be able to just stretch x2048 with some optimisations or slightly lower settings in play.
Will the difference be noticeable? I don't think it will for this game. However, when newer games come forward with raytracing, I can imagine a more noticeable difference between the two platforms.
Should you care? No. You should know what you are getting when you purchase each system at this point.
A next gen beast that is incredible value, or a decent next gen machine, with an incredible controller.
Me too. That said, if one console is 60fps at true 4k while the other is 60fps and upscaled then there is a clear power difference at play. That difference doesn't have to be used on res, it may be the case that FX will be better on the more powerful hardware.Can anyone here, hand on heart say that there's a difference between upscaled 4k and native 4k, while playing a game and not pausing to pixel count?
I prefer FauxK to 4K, with 60fps, no RT and all of the physics, destruction etc, dialled up to 11
35% only in phil Spencer dreamsAfter years of tech understanding/engineering/architecture analyses. I like to think I understand things at a deep level.
From what I have seen from public showings, and also some behind the scenes stuff. I feel the XSX will be around 35% more capable.
I can see XSX being native 4k(2160P), and PS5 being dynamic 4K(1440-1800P). Might be able to just stretch x2048 with some optimisations or slightly lower settings in play.
Will the difference be noticeable? I don't think it will for this game. However, when newer games come forward with raytracing, I can imagine a more noticeable difference between the two platforms.
Should you care? No. You should know what you are getting when you purchase each system at this point.
A next gen beast that is incredible value, or a decent next gen machine, with an incredible controller.
Ok. My point was that people should wait until the games come out or there is official confirmation.They've.*
To clarify, people have made a lot of mistakes by jumping the gun. I still believe that if it's not Native 4K, Assassins Creed will be slightly under 4K on the PS5 and the difference will not be really noticeable.
People are comparing this to the PS4 Pro/XB1X when the GPU gap was large and PS4 Pro couldn't run those higher resolution textures. These two factors alone makes a big difference in image quality.
This entire thread too.Like fine milk.
How? As far as we know, Valhalla is native 4k on Series X. What's with people jumping to conclusions with NO actual citations or proof.Like fine milk.
I believe this will be the case as well for most 3rd party open world games. This is why I made sure my new tv had freesync. Valhalla might pump out a steady framerate though as it was made to run on jaguar. I think it will fair pretty well.I bet GAFgold it doesn't even keep 60 fps consistently with the dynamic resolution... on both next-gen consoles.
60 fps AC is a pipe dream without too much hit to IQ via settings or res reduction, the Ubi team(s) just suck at CPU optimisation for some reason and then they add too much physics interaction and too many NPCs on top of it sucking.
Thinking must be "Oh we can't do much to keep 60fps even when we cut down the scale of the IQ and the NPC/physics count so lets just put in what we want from an immersion perspective because the framerate is already small-fucked so know cares if its medium-fucked".
I really hope it has a lock to 30 option so I can just enjoy the IQ. I don't play AC games for framerate because going above 1080p (+ optimised settings) usually means drops below 60 so I gave up a few years back.
The new GPUs should solve this issue... but only for this AC... not the next-gen one. Then we'll be back in the AC:Unity situation again I'm betting although hopefully will be above 30 fps on launch day on consoles this time lol.
You obviously didn't read spoiler since you had to bring Xbox up. My comment is about that if it's dynamic and little below 4k, who cares, it's gonna look good, it's not like 480p or something.Isn't it Watch Dogs Legion on XSX ? Looks like the countryside around London.
I heard it will be upscaled from 1440p on XSX unfortunately.
Another day spent productively spreading FUD, I see.....
I think that even the XSX is upscaled too it will be a situation similar seen in XBX vs PS4 Pro where the XSX will have a higher and better resolution and assets.
What made it serious biz was sony shitting on xbox 1080p vz 900p and sharing games remember. Now Sony is getting shit on from the goConsole Wars are serious business. If your console of choice performs slightly better than the opposition - imagine what wonders that'll do for your self esteem!
So both are upscaled 4k 60
And this thread is itsfuckingnothjng.gif
Craig?Source?
Craig?
Based on what's been reported, it seems there are optimizations in place for the XSX to have native 4K for ACV.
Ok. So they are trying to say series X uses graphic setting different to the ps5? Because optimization aren't magical things
After years of tech understanding/engineering/architecture analyses. I like to think I understand things at a deep level.
From what I have seen from public showings, and also some behind the scenes stuff. I feel the XSX will be around 35% more capable.
I can see XSX being native 4k(2160P), and PS5 being dynamic 4K(1440-1800P). Might be able to just stretch x2048 with some optimisations or slightly lower settings in play.
Will the difference be noticeable? I don't think it will for this game. However, when newer games come forward with raytracing, I can imagine a more noticeable difference between the two platforms.
Should you care? No. You should know what you are getting when you purchase each system at this point.
A next gen beast that is incredible value, or a decent next gen machine, with an incredible controller.
AC:V has no RT implementation and seems to be running on an engine very close to Oddyssey.
Why is it compared to WD which uses RT and a different engine? That makes no sense whatsoever if you’ve watched gameplay of both games.
I believe this will be the case as well for most 3rd party open world games. This is why I made sure my new tv had freesync. Valhalla might pump out a steady framerate though as it was made to run on jaguar. I think it will fair pretty well.
What made it serious biz was sony shitting on xbox 1080p vz 900p and sharing games remember. Now Sony is getting shit on from the go
2+ TFLOPs?Maybe it's the extra 2+ rdna tflops?
And this has been the problem since 360 and PS3 daysIts looking likely that these consoles will turn out to be 1440p upscaled boxes and the pro versions will end up being the "native" 4k ones.
Pretty shitty tbh. Before we could even get solid 1080p/60fps games, everyone started chasing 4k. I think the same will happen with 4k, devs will eventually chase 8k and 4k will become the new 1080p.
Performance > Resolution always at least for me.
2+ TFLOPs?
So PS5's less than 10? 9TF region?
I see, could you provide the source of it being 9TF? Thanks.Technically yes. There is a difference. between sustained and variable that fanboys are pretending isn't the case.
Please delight us. Because most of fanboy talk about tech stuff which barely know, sustained and variable means nothing in the true performanceTechnically yes. There is a difference. between sustained and variable that fanboys are pretending isn't the case.
2+ TFLOPs?
So PS5's less than 10? 9TF region?
I see, could you provide the source of it being 9TF? Thanks.
Would be quite bizzarre. It means they lowered a lot of graphic setting because on pc you can't have very high setting above 1440p rendering even in a 2080 superI'll be genuinely suprised if the Xsx is native
More 9tf baiting from the usual suspects I see.
Imagine being this toxic.
You're one to talk. You even go around stalking for reaction revenge. Toxic AF