spindoctor
Member
Not buying that he didn't get credits and yet kept trying for two months straight.
The mother is lying and going for the sympathy play.
The mother is lying and going for the sympathy play.
Bank charges are a mess as there is burden of proof. I've been in the situation of overdrawn not due to my fault, due to pending charges for failed transactions with the Nintendo eShop and its stupid invisible daily spending limit. As it was pending changes and my actual balance was always above 0 (the available balance was not) they were able to refund. This however is a bit different.A Google spokeswoman told Guardian Money that having looked at Nick and Pennys case again, it would now be refunding the family but it will not be refunding the bank charges incurred. It is still trying to work out what exactly happened.
It happens.This happened to me too, but from apple. I tried buying the gold bars for AdVenture Capitalist. I paid for it, but didn't receive the gold bars. I assumed there was a problem so I tried buying again and still I didn't get the gold bars. So I gave up.
The next day I received a receipt from apple stating that I purcchased 2 IAP goods from the game.
But luckily, I contacted apple and they refunded my money.
A password should be enough. It should be impossible to guess by a fucking 8 year old. That's why people need to be educated about password security instead of picking shitty passwords ("but they're so easy to remember!").My nephew who is 8 managed to guess his mothers password and spent £500~ on IAP just the other month, thankfully apple support refunded it all after checking transaction history.
You can say "use a password, dummy!" but sometimes it's not enough, the whole online structure for IAP sales needs to be limited in a time frame.
1. 123456
2. password
3. 12345
4. 12345678
5. qwerty
6. 123456789
7. 1234
Assuming that Play Store would realise the error and rectify it, Nicks grandfather Tom contacted Google, only to be told the payments were correct and nothing could be done. Instead of the refund he says he was simply invited to think happy thoughts.
Independent of the other foolishness in this story, they certainly should get refunded if they didn't actually receive what was paid for. Although we do only have their word for that, don't we?So the credits didn't even appear in the game which prompted him to keep trying? They deserve a refund here of that is true.
Who doesn't check their account over 2 months?
I really hope that is incorrect, I struggle to believe that parents would do something this naive. If you really are giving kids money via a card like this then common sense tells you that you need to give them a pre-paid card rather than the means to make you overdrawn as has happened here.Like thousands of other parents, Penny Wrinch handed over her debit card details...
A password should be enough. It should be impossible to guess by a fucking 8 year old. That's why people need to be educated about password security instead of picking shitty passwords ("but they're so easy to remember!").
These are the actual most common passwords out there
Scary, I know. And if "family member name" would be consolidated as one password, I'm sure it'd be among the most popular as well.Code:1. 123456 2. password 3. 12345 4. 12345678 5. qwerty 6. 123456789 7. 1234
These are the actual most common passwords out there
Scary, I know. And if "family member name" would be consolidated as one password, I'm sure it'd be among the most popular as well.Code:1. 123456 2. password 3. 12345 4. 12345678 5. qwerty 6. 123456789 7. 1234
This is why these exist
The issue here is that the kid hasn't got what he paid for, or at least claims thus. He "didn't realise" he was spending the money because he wasn't getting what he was supposedly paying for and so assumed he wasn't being charged.
If that's the legit truth, I don't see any issue with the parenting. Anyone would click again if they thought a transaction hadn't gone through, child or not.
I'm sorry, is there supposed to be sympathy here somewhere?
I see a dumb ass parent who needs a lesson taught and this seems like a start.
The kid can not magically input bank information without an adult giving it to them or helping them, so it aways comes back to the adult being a dumb ass and not reading or taking the time to look into what their child is doing.
NO, google should not refund them.
That is asinine.
If Google refunds it, it just keeps happening because someone can always keep pointing to these instances.
Take ownership of your idiocy, and be responsible for your own screw ups unlike most of society these days who always try and find an out or someone else to blame.
I find it highly unlikely that purchases weren't showing up for different apps during two months.As for most of you going "transactions are infallible google is my god, the Kid is a LIAR. I know because I was an 11 year old once." /s
It happens.
A password should be enough. It should be impossible to guess by a fucking 8 year old. That's why people need to be educated about password security instead of picking shitty passwords ("but they're so easy to remember!").
These are the actual most common passwords out there
Scary, I know. And if "family member name" would be consolidated as one password, I'm sure it'd be among the most popular as well.Code:1. 123456 2. password 3. 12345 4. 12345678 5. qwerty 6. 123456789 7. 1234
Careful: they are *claiming* there was a technical error. If there was, they absolutely should be refunded. But we only have their word for that.Didn't read the op? There was a technical error with the store.
Google spokeswoman told Guardian Money that having looked at Nick and Pennys case again, it would now be refunding the family.
To be fair, they were refunded by Google (minus the bank charges) :Careful: they are *claiming* there was a technical error. If there was, they absolutely should be refunded. But we only have their word for that.
It's just that OP is missing some pretty important info in its quotes.A Google spokeswoman told Guardian Money that having looked at Nick and Pennys case again, it would now be refunding the family but it will not be refunding the bank charges incurred. It is still trying to work out what exactly happened.
A password should be enough. It should be impossible to guess by a fucking 8 year old. That's why people need to be educated about password security instead of picking shitty passwords ("but they're so easy to remember!").
These are the actual most common passwords out there
Scary, I know. And if "family member name" would be consolidated as one password, I'm sure it'd be among the most popular as well.Code:1. 123456 2. password 3. 12345 4. 12345678 5. qwerty 6. 123456789 7. 1234
Careful: they are *claiming* there was a technical error. If there was, they absolutely should be refunded. But we only have their word for that.
These are the actual most common passwords out there
Code:3. 12345
To be fair, they were refunded by Google (minus the bank charges) :
It's just that OP is missing some pretty important info in its quotes.
Edit: well, beaten.
Why is it scary that those are the most common passwords? The unique passwords that are well made are not going to show up for that very reason, so of course these are the most common.A password should be enough. It should be impossible to guess by a fucking 8 year old. That's why people need to be educated about password security instead of picking shitty passwords ("but they're so easy to remember!").
These are the actual most common passwords out there
Scary, I know. And if "family member name" would be consolidated as one password, I'm sure it'd be among the most popular as well.Code:1. 123456 2. password 3. 12345 4. 12345678 5. qwerty 6. 123456789 7. 1234
I'm not sure where you're going with this but I can assure you that it was either a dumb password or she told it to him but didn't remember otherwhise he would not have known it. You cannot simply guess passwords, we're not living in a hollywood movie.I'm not sure how he guessed her password but I know for sure it was not anything like that, most likely a string of names or items.
I disagree with you, there should be server side caps on buying IAP to stop £500 being spent in such a short time.
Who didnt read the OP
Penny says £3,000 was paid to Google Play over a two-month period
On 2 March alone, 21 payments of £3.99 and a further nine of £1.49 disappeared from Penny’s account. The next day Nick tried again to buy the credits and the same thing happened – with 18 payments being made to Google. A week later 27 payments of between £2.99 and £6.99 were all debited.
I still find it amazing that it's even possible to spend this kind of cash on these incredibly simple mobile games. The Witcher 3 cost me £30 for all of it. It makes no sense at all.
Still, the kid's 11, he should know better.
I'm not sure where you're going with this but I can assure you that it was either a dumb password or she told it to him but didn't remember otherwhise he would not have known it. You cannot simply guess passwords, we're not living in a hollywood movie.
To your second point, why do you need to make it more inconvenient for people to spend the money who also want to only because there is a small amount of naive parents thinking their kids are different or rather nit thinking at all.
Now if you're thinking in the direction of addictiveness prevention, that's more reasonable.
This, too.I think there need to be default limits, like if you're spending a couple hundred dollars in a short amount of time they need to enforce a cooldown or require some sort of additional check to override it because that's usually indicative of fraudulent behavior.