• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Biggest crow a developer has served this past gen?

I'm confused. I thought something being crow was shit.

"I'll eat crow." = "I'll eat shit."

Have I been wrong this whole time?

Eating crow doesn't mean eating shit. Eating crow is simply proving wrong when everyone doubted you, and the eating process is the humiliation the one doubting it faces.

For example "I'll eat crow if Uncharted 4 trailer is real time" or "I'll eat crow if half life 3 is revealed at E3".

It's a bet where you're sure you're not wrong but there is always a chance that you may be, so it's always great to see crow being served when someone is wrong.
 
Uncharted 2, specially when they announced that there would be online multiplayer and people kept saying that taking resources away from the single player would affect its quality.

DmC ended up being a lot of goddamned fun.

only for some

it wasn't as good nor as successful as the previous ones though.
 
Demons' Souls. I remember when it was first demoed, nearly everyone was on the hate train. People were mocking its 'PS2 graphics', wonky animations, and more. Then the game was released in Asia and people did a 180 based on how good it actually was.
 
Wii Sports/Wii Fit seem like the obvious choices on consoles. Nintendogs was the clear winner on traditional handhelds; I distinctly remember the reactions to Famitsu's 40/40 review, and then the game went on to be one of the best selling games of the generation.

I think Angry Birds and Farmville also absolutely qualify.
 
Xenoblade. When Nintendo released a few screens of it at an e3 all anyone could talk about was his shitty the fruit stand textures looked like it was a fruit stand simulator or something.
 
Eating crow basically means admitting you were wrong.

Eating crow doesn't mean eating shit. Eating crow is simply proving wrong when everyone doubted you, and the eating process is the humiliation the one doubting it faces.

For example "I'll eat crow if Uncharted 4 trailer is real time" or "I'll eat crow if half life 3 is revealed at E3".

It's a bet where you're sure you're not wrong but there is always a chance that you may be, so it's always great to see crow being served when someone is wrong.

OH! I never knew that. That makes perfect sense, even in the context where I first heard it.

TheMoreYouKnow.jpg

In that case, I take back what I said about Watch_Dogs - that was called from a mile away. DmC definitely isn't a good example either, but as someone said already, people for some reason will defend this game even in the face of the superior games before it.

Human Revolution is a good example.
 
People will argue into the ground DmC is a good game so its best to stick to the simple answer: It sold worse than DMC 4. Thats all you have to say. It sold worse. The reboot failed. Done. You cant refute the fact it sold worse.

Just because It sold worse and doesn't play as well as the old games mean its a bad game? It's not like Capcom lost money on it since it was outsourced to someone else. With this shitty logic a bunch of low selling great games are bad. And IMO DMC3>DMC1>DmC>DMC4>>>Some other game with Dante.
 
There were countless naysayers for U2's multiplayer. How at best it would be tacked on and at worst would be tacked on and make the single-player short and shitty. Not only was the single-player spectacular, but the mp went onto become one of the biggest multiplayer draws on PS3. Basically wrong in all ways, thankfully.
 
Batman Arkham Asylum, easily. A game from a relatively unknown developer on a licensed IP? There was no reason for anyone to give it a 2nd glance. Then reviews started rolling out and we all stuffed ourselves to the gills with crow.
 
I'd probably go with Batman Arkham Asylum.

Lets be real about this, before Batman AA, even dreaming about a good AAA superhero game would have gotten you laughed out of the room and be shunned for being a naive idiot who still believe that making a good superhero game is possible.

After Batman AA people can't seem to stop wondering which superhero will Rocksteady will do next?
 
TLOU multiplayer, same complaints from Uncharted 2. People felt it was going to be tacked on and take away from the single player. Ends up it's one of the best multiplayer experiences from last gen.
 
I think the Tomb Raider reboot surprised a lot of people. Course, it didn't help that the dev was out there talking the whole 'you'll want to protect her' deal.

I'm kinda getting that vibe with The Order and RAD saying all the wrong things.
 
Just because It sold worse and doesn't play as well as the old games mean its a bad game? It's not like Capcom lost money on it since it was outsourced to someone else. With this shitty logic a bunch of low selling great games are bad. And IMO DMC3>DMC1>DmC>DMC4>>>Some other game with Dante.
Nonsense list, Bayonetta is the best DMC game.

OT: Idk if it counts as crow, but there was some weird group on GAF that insisted on comparing Darksiders to Bayonetta only because they released close to each other. Not only were they crazy, they were wrong.
 
I remember there being some folks looking down on Dead Rising 2 for not coming from Capcom JP and being made by some guys in canada who made sports games?

I ended up enjoying DR2 much more than DR1 and am anxiously waiting for DR3 to come out on steam.

I think the Tomb Raider reboot surprised a lot of people. Course, it didn't help that the dev was out there talking the whole 'you'll want to protect her' deal.

That game was really, really good and didn't deserve the shit it got.
 
I'd probably go with Batman Arkham Asylum.

Lets be real about this, before Batman AA, even dreaming about a good AAA superhero game would have gotten you laughed out of the room and be shunned for being a naive idiot who still believe that making a good superhero game is possible.

After Batman AA people can't seem to stop wondering which superhero will Rocksteady will do next?

310968750967_1.jpg
 
If you said Deus Ex HR or Batman Arkham Asylum then you were right. Both games met fans and critics extremely high expectations completely out of left field. When people heard about Batman there was little to no one talking about how amazing it was going to be. Most people had written it off before it even came out. Deus Ex had similar issues but not because it's based on a movie or comic but an already preexisting series. Both games completely blew me away.
 
Batman Arkham Asylum, easily. A game from a relatively unknown developer on a licensed IP? There was no reason for anyone to give it a 2nd glance. Then reviews started rolling out and we all stuffed ourselves to the gills with crow.

Ooh, that's a good one. First time I saw it was a demo in the store. It was just the first map of challenge mode, so I thought, "Oh, it's just a shitty beat-'em-up with the Batman license. Meh."

Then I started hearing people throwing the word "Metroidvania" around, so I checked it out anyway and it wound up being one of my favorite games of the generation.
 
The hype for Batman AA was insane on GAF, I totally disagree, lots of people were convinced it was going to be hot shit.
 
I remember a lot of people making fun of Batman AA, and it turned out to be completely amazing. Though a superhero game by a relatively unknown developer doesn't seem like a recipe for success.

This was it for me

A licensed video game
From a no-track developer
 
Wii Sports/Wii Fit seem like the obvious choices on consoles. Nintendogs was the clear winner on traditional handhelds; I distinctly remember the reactions to Famitsu's 40/40 review, and then the game went on to be one of the best selling games of the generation.

Yup, these. Nintendo was serving a lot of crow last gen in general.
 
[/QUOTE]

Shit that game was so fun to swing around in. Dunno what happened in the third game.

Also, the DmC and DMC4 talk made me look at combo vids. Perhaps I'm looking at the wrong DmC videos, but none of them look as good as any of the DMC4 ones I find.

I mean shit, this is beautiful: [url]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjsuGB3S92Q#t=244[/url]
 
DmC ended up being a lot of goddamned fun.
naw.

i mean some people probably enjoyed it, but no crow was served. it turned out exactly how intelligent critics of the direction thought it would, shallow and inferior gameplay that relied entirely on aesthetic to impress. sales reflected that too.
 
DmC is the opposite of the topics premise. Naysayers said that the game would be worse than prior entries because it was likely to be dumbed down and pointed out numerous serious flaws with the game prior to release. All of these flaws ended up making it into the final release, the game was dumbed down, and it sold the worst of any entry in the series. The only way DmC would have served to actually count as serving crow is to the folks championing it prior to release.

This is correct. But at the same time, people also give DmC way less credit than it deserves just so they can say there were correct all along. It's definitely nowhere near the garbage a lot of people thought it would be.
 
Spider-Man 2 is probably a big crow serving. Before Spider-Man 2 the most notable super hero game on the market was Superman 64, and it was notable for all the wrong reasons.

Shit that game was so fun to swing around in. Dunno what happened in the third game.

Also, the DmC and DMC4 talk made me look at combo vids. Perhaps I'm looking at the wrong DmC videos, but none of them look as good as any of the DMC4 ones I find.

I mean shit, this is beautiful: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjsuGB3S92Q#t=244

I haven't been able to find many combo videos for DmC that make it look on the same level as 3 or 4. Some of the stuff people can do in DMC4 is magical, which is why gameplay wise I think 4 is actually the pinnacle of the franchise.

This is correct. But at the same time, people also give DmC way less credit than it deserves just so they can say there were correct all along. It's definitely nowhere near the garbage a lot of people thought it would be.

Eh, it's ultimately subjective but I still legitimately think DmC was the worst game I personally played in 2013. The gameplay stripped a ton of things from the DMC formula, contributed nothing new in place of any of that, and the story/writing was stunningly awful.
 
Top Bottom