White men don't have a huge advantage in life over literally everyone else?
You talking about in America?
White men don't have a huge advantage in life over literally everyone else?
That's not what was meant by "work on" white supremacy.
Work on, as in "talk about these things and how to deal with them."
If this is the level of conversation to expect...
White men don't have a huge advantage in life over literally everyone else?
That would be a limitation of the medium. We don't know what the email intended. Only the words contained.
Yes, it was very poorly worded. I had to read it a couple of times to make sure she wasn't implying that we're all a bunch of white supremacists.
The instruction is definitely discriminatory. Ask yourself if it would be "okay" if the roles were reversed. I keep coming to the same conclusion, and that is "No; the backlash would be extraordinary if that was the case."
As an European I wonder if this constant focus on racism in the United States isn't actually furthering racial divisiveness?
You talking about in America?
As an European I wonder if this constant focus on racism in the United States isn't actually furthering racial divisiveness?
There's a backlash in this case. It's not her fault that some people have poor reading comprehension, or that some people are offended by the idea of people of color wanting a safe space for a short time.
I think your missing the point. Excluding anyone for any reason is discrimination.
White men don't have a huge advantage in life over literally everyone else?
There's a backlash in this case. It's not her fault that some people have poor reading comprehension, or that some people are offended by the idea of people of color wanting a safe space for a short time.
Can't say I mind really. Exclusionary safe spaces for minority/oppressed groups is sometimes necessary.
If you can't be honest in front of a different race, diversity will never be achieved.
"Safe space" .......... safe from what exactly?
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAAHHA.
WHOOOOOO.
If there were racial issues and issues of discrimination at the campus, the victims deserve no space to discuss it without giving an open invitation to some of the people who may perpetuate it? Failing to invite said perpetrators then shifts the failure of true diversity on to the victims. Amazing.
Can't say I mind really. Exclusionary safe spaces for minority/oppressed groups is sometimes necessary.
So not inviting white people is protecting people from racists?
They have this. It's called prison
How is excluding an entire groups viewpoint a good thing? Why just assume that every white person (or every male in the second case) is in cahoots and are working toward hurting non whites/males?Giving them a space to discuss problem with inclusion and racism with a lessoned worry of it getting back to people in positions of authority? Yes. Ensuring that people feel comfortable expressing their experiences without worry of being seen as a troublemaker, misanthrope or race baiter? Yes.
Your privilege clearly makes it impossible for you to accept this frame. You'd throw a fit about not being invited to a seminar on ending male perpetrated sexual violence and making the school safer towards women too, wouldn't you?
Do you think racism will go away if people just ignore it?
So not inviting white people is protecting people from racists?
Okay, I can see your point and that's true.BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAAHHA.
WHOOOOOO.
If there were racial issues and issues of discrimination at the campus, the victims deserve no space to discuss it without giving an open invitation to some of the people who may perpetuate it? Failing to invite said perpetrators then shifts the failure of true diversity on to the victims. Amazing.
These are all good points that, you're right, I hadn't considered. I still hold that it could have been handled in a less confrontational way, but in this context, I can see how it would be beneficial.Giving them a space to discuss problem with inclusion and racism with a lessoned worry of it getting back to people in positions of authority? Yes. Ensuring that people feel comfortable expressing their experiences without worry of being seen as a troublemaker, misanthrope or race baiter? Yes.
Your privilege clearly makes it impossible for you to accept this frame. You'd throw a fit about not being invited to a seminar on ending male perpetrated sexual violence and making the school safer towards women too, wouldn't you?
Isn't that what feminists often ask for? That the boys get educated about sexual assaults as well, instead of just telling girls to not get drunk?Your privilege clearly makes it impossible for you to accept this frame. You'd throw a fit about not being invited to a seminar on ending male perpetrated sexual violence and making the school safer towards women too, wouldn't you?
How is excluding an entire groups viewpoint a good thing? Why just assume that every white person (or every male in the second case) is in cahoots and are working toward hurting non whites/males?
Can whites or men or whoever not learn from others?
It's impossible for a white person to attend a meeting like this and not chime in that something isn't actually racist and dismissing opinions.
Take your white privilege blinders off and maybe you'll understand!
Giving them a space to discuss problem with inclusion and racism with a lessoned worry of it getting back to people in positions of authority? Yes. Ensuring that people feel comfortable expressing their experiences without worry of being seen as a troublemaker, misanthrope or race baiter? Yes.
There are times on GAF where I really can't tell what is sarcasm and what isn't.
The quick glance at this reads like it excludes white people, then says that if those white people want to get together to do some racist shit then they can do that.
I'm I'm reading that right, sounds pretty racist and angry.
Diversity training is Bullshit.What kind of daft morons are running this thing?
(video at the link)
http://www.king5.com/news/local/Col...ying-to-exclude-white-staffers-249652471.html
Holding a meeting to discuss how not to discriminate based on skin color...by discriminating based on skin color. Okay.
Giving them a space to discuss problem with inclusion and racism with a lessoned worry of it getting back to people in positions of authority? Yes. Ensuring that people feel comfortable expressing their experiences without worry of being seen as a troublemaker, misanthrope or race baiter? Yes.
Your privilege clearly makes it impossible for you to accept this frame. You'd throw a fit about not being invited to a seminar on ending male perpetrated sexual violence and making the school safer towards women too, wouldn't you?
I think your missing the point. Excluding anyone for any reason is discrimination.
As an European I wonder if this constant focus on racism in the United States isn't actually furthering racial divisiveness?
As an American, I definitely believe it is.
I don't think excluding white people is the problem so much as backhandedly accusing them all of advancing "racism and white supremacy" in the community.
It's more than a little disingenuous to dismiss that as a problem of "poor wording."
Unless the guys showing up are carrying baseball bats, staring people down, or being disruptive, you'd think that the people running the seminar would be happy to have men attend. In fact, when I went to college, there was a seminar on this subject that required everyone to attend.
"happy hour" to "build support and community" for people of color.
I don't think it did that at all.
It basically asked white people to come up with their own ways to fight racism among themselves.