• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Samuel L. Jackson criticizes hiring of British actors, Boyega shoots back

Status
Not open for further replies.
If they got a Peruvian to play say, Pancho Villa, it'd be fucking offensive. It's basically saying 'all brown people are the same'. As a Mexican, I would be offended if they did something like that. So I have to disagree with you there.

Well, there's a difference between playing a historical character and playing a fictional character, so yes, it would be much more outrageous to cast a historical figure like that, but that issue is not present on Get Out, it's just an average man.

Casting a peruvian guy as "Juan Perez from Puebla" wouldn't be outrageous at all if the guy gets the accent and acting right.

If the screenplay specifically states the character is an African American, and then they hire a black British actor, you wonder could they not find anyone in the U.S. that could play the role? If the screenplay just says black character, then sure, no problem.

Oh, sure it is a problem if they couldn't find local talent, but that's hardly a reason to undermine Get Out, it is a huge problem among Hollywood in general.
Plus, like people have mentioned in the thread already, British and overall foreign actors get cast as american white guys too.
 
If the screenplay specifically states the character is an African American, and then they hire a black British actor, you wonder could they not find anyone in the U.S. that could play the role? If the screenplay just says black character, then sure, no problem.

oooorrrrrrrrrrrr you hire the guy who gave the best performance at the casting call.

It's not like you're veering into blackface territory
 
Sam Jackson might be an Uncle Tom.

He hates on rappers turned actors
He hates on Black Brit actors

Has no problem being in movies with a predominately White cast (except for him, of course) where white characters say the N word a hundred times all around him (Pulp Fiction, Django, Hateful 8).
This is the hottest of takes in which you disregard the point of at least Django and Hateful 8 (haven't seen Pulp Fiction so can't speak up for that).
 
I get where Sam Jacksons coming from, but the job is called acting, you don't need to have lived the life you portray on screen.

Like... I don't believe SJ should have been excluded from Star Wars because he never lived that jedi life.

I mean, I'm not black and I don't think there's any reason to be so dismissive of British actors like he is being, but you can't compare "Being a Jedi" to "Being black in America" - one of those things is fiction, the other is reality. I have no doubt that someone's experiences can only add to their ability to portray something they feel passionate about, that said I don't think it detracts from someone ELSE'S ability to do that as well.

Does SLJ make any other social commentary comments on white people playing Native American roles?

I mean, he's human, he's allowed to be concerned over one thing and not as vocal or obviously concerned about another similar thing. It doesn't make him a hypocrite or anything.
 
Both black and white brits have taken over Hollywood.

But I do find issue with Sam's assertion that a US actor would have brought something more to the role as if UK and US black male experiences are not similar in terms of interracial dating.

tend to wonder what Get Out would have been with an American brother who really feels that." Get Out star Daniel Kaluuya, who is British, might not be able to fully sympathize with how black Americans handle white American racism, according to Jackson: "Daniel grew up in a country where they've been interracial dating for a hundred years

Now this is silly. It was still a problem for interracial dating in the UK even deep into the mid 1980s I personally know plenty of white women who became my aunties who were disowned for having children with black men.

And if anything Daniel Kaluuya would have had insight into how segregated the US is in terms of race. you feel it as soon as you get here.
 
If they got a Peruvian to play say, Pancho Villa, it'd be fucking offensive. It's basically saying 'all brown people are the same'. As a Mexican, I would be offended if they did something like that. So I have to disagree with you there.

This happens with every single ethnicity out there, including white people (white Brits playing white Americans is something that gets brought up all the time). If you're going to get mad about it, get mad about it for everyone, not just when it happens to effect your ethnicity.
 
Boyega is right. The problem of american actors it's one that goes deep into the ages, they simply lack the preparation and training you see on British actors or even Australian ones. When a director demand emotion on a drama very few american actors can deliever. So americans up your game if you want a chance, start training actors like you should...
 
The level of hot takes in this thread is astounding.

Can the diaspora have some internal critique and difference of opinion without the alarms going off about supposed "division"?

Can non diaspora folk please mind ya fucking business?
 
I don't think it's just Black actors specifically. It's Brits of all races. For whatever reason Hollywood does hire a lot of actors from the UK and Australia over Americans. It's a bit ridiculous just how many big stars come from those countries.
 
oooorrrrrrrrrrrr you hire the guy who gave the best performance at the casting call.

It's not like you're veering into blackface territory

If that's what happened I have no issues with it, but the casting process isn't necessarily always about who's most talented.
 
If they got a Peruvian to play say, Pancho Villa, it'd be fucking offensive. It's basically saying 'all brown people are the same'. As a Mexican, I would be offended if they did something like that. So I have to disagree with you there.

Was a German playing Steve Jobs offensive?
 
If they got a Peruvian to play say, Pancho Villa, it'd be fucking offensive. It's basically saying 'all brown people are the same'. As a Mexican, I would be offended if they did something like that. So I have to disagree with you there.
I get upset when actors who aren't from Boston play Bostonians.
 
Boyega is right. The problem of american actors it's one that goes deep into the ages, they simply lack the preparation and training you see on British actors or even Australian ones. When a director demand emotion on a drama very few american actors can deliever. So americans up your game if you want a chance, start training actors like you should...

But talent's not usually why they're hired, it's because they're fairly cheaper. There are plenty of British pretty boys with only slim acting talent who are usually hired because they're willing to work for less. Sometimes they're cast because the director or casting director thinks they're right for the role, but most of the time that's not really the case.

Hollywood cinema or at least major films have never been about acting talent 100%. It's been about what sells first and foremost.
 
I mean, I'm not black and I don't think there's any reason to be so dismissive of British actors like he is being, but you can't compare "Being a Jedi" to "Being black in America" - one of those things is fiction, the other is reality.

I was taking the argument to its ridiculous logical extreme, but c'mon.
Get Out isn't cinéma-vérité.

If you want to make that argument, use something like Idris Elba in the Wire.
 
If they got a Peruvian to play say, Pancho Villa, it'd be fucking offensive. It's basically saying 'all brown people are the same'. As a Mexican, I would be offended if they did something like that. So I have to disagree with you there.
As a Colombian my approach has always been between "pfft/lol" and "rolleyes" whenever Mexicans get cast as Colombians (which is pretty much always, perhaps with the exception of a Brazilian being cast as Pablo Escobar). It's also funny when movies show cities/towns that are obviously Mexican and pass them as Colombia cities/towns. I don't really get offended by it, though I understand why other people would.

It all goes back to the whole "proper representation for minorities" thing though. I'm not sure where I stand on SLJ's comment. On one hand I think it's petty, on the other there's some merit to what he's saying. To be honest I didn't even know the Get Out actor was British.
 
Was a German playing Steve Jobs offensive?
Come on, guys. Pancho Villa is a very important cultural figure in Mexican History. Not just "some Mexican dude". It's understandable to have a guttural reaction like that. Much more so than Jobs.

The better example is David Oyelowo and MLK. I'm sure someone out there might have had a guttural reaction to MLK not being American, but great performance wins out.
 
If Jackson thinks that anxiety and a sense of otherness about being the only black guy in a white crowd/area doesn't exist in the UK, then he's sorely mistaken. It's obviously not 1/1, but it's close enough that this experience lacks merit.
 
I was taking the argument to its ridiculous logical extreme, but c'mon.
Get Out isn't cinéma-vérité.

If you want to make that argument, use something like Idris Elba in the Wire.

Idris Elba was so damn good in the Wire I didn't realize he wasn't actually from the US till I finally saw Luther years later. My mind was blown hearing his actual accent.
 
“Daniel grew up in a country where they’ve been interracial dating for a hundred years."

Wha? No. Where does he get this shit?

No idea, doesn't take much research or knowledge of the country to know how awfully wrong that statement is. The fact his argument relies on bullshit he didn't properly research says a lot.
 
I definitely get the spirit of what SLJ is saying, but think the results should be considered here more. I never got the feeling that Kaluuya "betrayed" his origins and failed the character in that way, but I'm not black.

This kinda reminds me of Michael K. Williams, post-The Wire. He would have people come up to him and say, "Damn man, Omar! I could tell you spent time on the street, just the way you carried yourself--you KNOW!"

But Williams' background and upbringing was *nothing* like Omar's, nor any character in The Wire. He was just a good fucking actor.
 
I see what he is saying though. It's already incredibly hard for a black American actor that's not one of the usual casted people to get roles and it makes it harder when you throw English actors into the mix. I'm not saying ban British etc actors or anything like that. Just saying it sucks when you already are facing an uphill battle

It's different for white actors. There are plenty of roles for white actors out there. So when 1 or 2 British actors put on an accent it's not really changing the status. But when you have like 10 black roles a year, and 1 goes to the Sam Jackson , the other to Denzel etc. and then you have an Englishactors also thrown into the mix, it's hard for black American actors to penetrate
 
This happens with every single ethnicity out there, including white people (white Brits playing white Americans is something that gets brought up all the time). If you're going to get mad about it, get mad about it for everyone, not just when it happens to effect your ethnicity.
Man white is white. Most are privileged and have nothing in the world to worry about, nor face racism, nor do they struggle to get roles like other races.
 
This happens with every single ethnicity out there, including white people (white Brits playing white Americans is something that gets brought up all the time). If you're going to get mad about it, get mad about it for everyone, not just when it happens to effect your ethnicity.

no.

this is very much a black american/PoC thing so please don't white wash the narrative pls&thx
 
While I understand Samuel's overall point in regards to "US Discrimination against Black people =/= British Discrimination against Black people", we're talking about a film and acting. As long as you look the part and can play the part well, that's all that should matter and for good reason. A lot of films would suffer greatly if actors were cast only if they were from the same non fictional locations as the fictional/non fictional characters (ex: the same city or state).
 
Come on, guys. Pancho Villa is a very important cultural figure in Mexican History. Not just "some Mexican dude". It's understandable to have a guttural reaction like that. Much more so than Jobs.

The better example is David Oyelowo and MLK. I'm sure someone out there might have had a guttural reaction to MLK not being American, but great performance wins out.

It's a difference between ethnicity and nationality. Someone from Mexico and someone from Peru could be of the same race or ethnicity. Meanwhile Louis CK is of Mexican ancestry. Would it make more sense to cast Louis CK as Pancho Villa?
 
The level of hot takes in this thread is astounding.

Can the diaspora have some internal critique and difference of opinion without the alarms going off about supposed "division"?

Can non diaspora folk please mind ya fucking business?
Haha, for some reason, Hit Em Up popped right into my mind:

Now when I came out I told you it was just about Biggie
Then everybody had to open their mouth with a m************n opinion
 
Man white is white. Most are privileged and have nothing in the world to worry about, nor face racism, nor do they struggle to get roles like other races.

That's not how it works, but seeing it unfold, it's like white americans don't care what country portrays white americans in movies, not sure how other countries react to their white people played by americans/foreigners.

I think Leo Dicaprio got flack for his portrayal of a white african once?
 
The whole thing w/ Brit actors is a big fish small pond situation, right? It's easier to get noticed when your country's the size of Nevada.

Uh... the UK is about 23 nevadas, population wise.
 
They have been interacially dating for hundreds of years? I didn't know the UK was Brazil. Citation needed on this one, Sam L.

I've been seeing a lot of British actors honking out a lot of horrible American accents lately. An American actor will get called out for butchering a British accent, but someone like Benedict Cumberbatch gets praised for their range if they can imitate Foghorn Leghorn.

This. There are a lot of british actors right now period. And none of can really speak with a native american accent. Either american actors are horrible or there's a british thing going on right now.
 
I understand where Jackson is coming, but, i mean, it's kinda a really weird thing to do, to try to undermine "Get Out" that is.

I can understand his point to some extent, but it's not like British cinema and TV is awash with great roles for black actors.


I get where Sam Jacksons coming from, but the job is called acting, you don't need to have lived the life you portray on screen.

I understand the angle he's coming from but its so...minor. As a black man I'm happy to see a black character in movies regardless if he's a black brit, black american or a straight up black African.

I understand. But we all gotta eat.

While I can understand where Jackson's argument for Kaluuya is coming from (I didn't even know he was British when I watched Get Out, dude's American accent is good) I will assume that Kaluuya isn't free from racism just because he lives in Britain. Sure it might not be as murderous as American racism, but it's still there.

They both have valid stances on this. I don't think it's a huge deal for Brits to be playing African-Americans but I do think there is some value in pointing it out.

I get Jackson's argument but goddamn is Boyega's response perfectly succinct.

What the hell? The crux of Jackson's argument is that the issue of interracial relationships in Britain was solved in the distant past and no British actor could possibly relate to the premise of the film the way a black American could. Which is so inaccurate it scuppers the entire argument.


He's had it with the motherfucking Brits in these motherfucking flicks.
Spectacular work, as always.
 
What the hell? The crux of Jackson's argument is that the issue of interracial relationships in Britain was solved in the distant past and no British actor could possibly relate to the premise of the film the way a black American could. Which is so inaccurate it scuppers the entire argument.

But that's the thing, it is inaccurate, but you can understand the spirit of "Give African american actors the shot they deserve", he just articulated the message in an incredibly inept way.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom