• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

First Lawsuit over Aurora Massacre Hits

Status
Not open for further replies.
1 and 3 are ridiculous.

What is a movie theater supposed to do, have armed guards and a metal detector at every door? People go out the back doors of movie theaters all the time, I know I do.

Don't know enough about doctors' responsibility and details of the case to know much about 2.

Even if you are on medication, the doctor can't perform pre-crime and assume that you might go out and kill someone. If so, much of the country would be in jail from taking anti-depressants and the like.
 
He'd have a better chance if he waited awhile and did a civil case against the Holmes' family.

(1) They can't sue the "Holmes' family" unless you can find a cause of action, such as negligent entrustment, to go after them on. They can go after Holmes himself, but, well, he's broke and has roughly $0 earning potential for the rest of his life.
(2) I don't know how much money the Holmes family has, but I guarantee their pockets are much shallower than the defendants who were named.
 
Sounds like someone is trying to win the ole 'redneck lottery.' When something bad happens to you or more often somebody you know, and you try to make as much money as possible by suing everyone who isn't responsible.
 
I hope Warner Brothers destroys this guy on #3.

#2 is possible I guess. I don't know enough to say anything about #1, are Fire Escape doors normally connected to alarms? I've used some and don't recall any alarms going off.
 
Talk about throwing everything to the wall and seeing what sticks. 2 is interesting but will prove hard to prove in court. 3 is ludicrous. 1 is almost as bad but who knows.
 
The doors near the screen are not intended to be emergency alarm doors. They're alternate exits.
 
Sounds like someone is trying to win the ole 'redneck lottery.' When something bad happens to you or more often somebody you know, and you try to make as much money as possible by suing everyone who isn't responsible.

That has been a sound legal tactic for greedy lawyers since forever. Cinemark doesn't want the bad press, WB will want it to go away - and while both will defend themselves, they generally settle for some sum to get it out of the press as quickly as possible. Sad but true.
 
1 and 3 are ridiculous.

What is a movie theater supposed to do, have armed guards and a metal detector at every door? People go out the back doors of movie theaters all the time, I know I do.

Don't know enough about doctors' responsibility and details of the case to know much about 2.

The door was propped open (allegedly) and no alarm sounded. If thats true then I would totally say the theater was negligent.
 
I don't know enough to say anything about #1, are Fire Escape doors normally connected to alarms? I've used some and don't recall any alarms going off.

They're just exits. At least that's how the largest chain in the US labels them. Not fire exits.
 
I'd agree with 1.

Can't really say anything about 2 without evidences.

3 is just ridiculous.

1 is ridiculous. They couldn't have planned for this and all the exits are used after the film to let people out in many theaters. 3 is ridiculous because Holmes couldn't have mimicked the events of DKR since he hadn't seen DKR.

Fuck scummy lawyers like this.
 
3. Warner Bros.

Wat?
They can't be serious.

Why not also sue Christopher Nolan or Christian Bale.

Hell, why not sue Bob Kane and Bill Finger.
yes, I know they are both dead. That's the point, it wouldn't make sense.
 
PoS scumbag this punk is. Some of these people lost their lives, some sacrificed it, he is complaining about the simple existence of the event?
 
The emergency exit doors are designed for specifically that purpose. They're a way to get people out quickly in case of a fire, bomb threat, or some other type of... emergency. I don't see how you can sue on the notion of them not being guarded. Although, having said that, I suppose them not being alarmed is fair game, although it's not common practice for them to be set up to set off alarms.

Don't think we know enough about 2. 3 should get thrown out immediately.
 
The doors near the screen are not intended to be emergency alarm doors. They're alternate exits.

That is where the lawyer will have a case. If they are required in order to evacuate the theater for fire or other reasons, they will in fact be considered emergency exits. Whether or not they HAVE to be alarmed for that reason is something more debatable. However they are more than likely required by local building code in the event of an emergency and as such would be considered "emergency exits" whether labelled in that manner or not.
 
1.- I have no doubt that the exit door system in theaters will change after the shooting, but it wasn't negligence the way it was set up before. The guy could have come through the front if he had to anyway.

2.- Doctors aren't psychic, I doubt any amount of monitoring would have helped in this case.

3. Hadn't even seen the movie.
 
How the hell were the doctors supposed to "monitor" this guy? What the hell...?

Yeah...unless there was just some blatant malpractice going on or the guy was on something that required regular levels being drawn, what monitoring is this lawyer talking about? I guess the doctor's office could call the guy to check in on him, but there is only so much the doctors can do. If the guy wasn't taking his meds and he's not in a hospital or other controlled environment, there isn't much you can do. People don't take their meds all the time.
 
That is where the lawyer will have a case. If they are required in order to evacuate the theater for fire or other reasons, they will in fact be considered emergency exits. Whether or not they HAVE to be alarmed for that reason is something more debatable. However they are more than likely required by local building code in the event of an emergency and as such would be considered "emergency exits" whether labelled in that manner or not.

If they HAVE to be alarmed, then every theater across the nation has some work to do.
 
It is definitely Warner Bros' fault. "No guns, no killing" was a call to arms.

Fuck lawyers in this country.
 
You also have to demonstrate a certain level of harm when you file lawsuit. "Mental anguish" is a catch all that is used a lot. Otherwise your suit gets thrown out. Almost always the claims are embellished but the specific ones this guy chose says to me hes just a scumbag lawyer out for money.
 
1 and 3 are bullshit.

Good luck proving # 2. Especially if Holmes stopped seeing doctors on the regular and they were unable to monitor him.
 
You mean the text that I spoiler tagged contains a spoiler?

Yeah, but many times people use the spoiler tags to say stuff like "just kidding" or anything else they want to cover just for the sake of it. I checked it by instinct thinking it would be something about the case in the OP without having the slight malevolence that it would be an actual spoiler for the movie.

Anyway, what's done is done.
 
I think I am going to sue this guy for forcing WB to spend money on lawsuits when they could instead be hiring me on fulltime instead of their bullshit contracts.
 
I think I am going to sue this guy for forcing WB to spend money on lawsuits when they could instead be hiring me on fulltime instead of their bullshit contracts.

Not if WB spends a set amount to keep attys on retainer.
 
You mean the text that I spoiler tagged contains a spoiler?
You have to contextualise spoiler tags. If you've been on NeoGAF more than 5 minutes you know that the spoiler tag when used without context is usually used as a joke. This isn't a Dark Knight thread.

It has been standard practice since before I registered to go "(dark knight spoilers)
spoiler
"

Don't plead ignorance to this either. You've been a member for ages.
 
Well the first one has some merit

The other 2 are just out there, especially #3

I know there are movie theaters who have CCTV/Cameras in the back positioned watching any people trying to get in to the theater, security does grab them

Also, the regular theater I go to with-in a 1.5 hour run time of a movie, an usher comes in 30-45 minutes block (2-3 total), goes near the theater, signs a white sheet, checks the theater nonchalantly and leaves
Regal Cinemas Midway 10 in NYC

Hell some of the theaters have an usher in front of each theater, checking tickets or with-in that area ie blocked off from theater hoppers + security
 
I don't know any big theater here that has alarms or is guarded.

And some theater security would have not really helped against a mad man with that much firepower.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom