Herbspiceguy
Member
how about deformed huge dinosaur type things
![]()
What a weird, non-sensical creature generation. You'd think they would have programmed something like: if bipedal, creature has claws instead of hoofs.
how about deformed huge dinosaur type things
![]()
Well thats not a good look...
I still don't see how those statements indicate that it would be a multiplayer game. Yes, he says it might be possible to see other players, but every single time he keeps saying that the chances of it is extremely small, which indicates to me a high unlikelihood any player would ever see another person.
So I still don't understand why any person would have bought this game for some nebulous multiplayer component that they clearly downplayed every time it was brought up.
how about deformed huge dinosaur type things
![]()
there are some strange creatures in the game..,
![]()
Seriously. Is there even a single sighting out there?
False statement.
These icon doesn't mean "online play" .
Even Until Dawn has the icon, "Online play" icons are the yellow ones.
Oh look, a bunch of people making something out of nothing.
Yep my UK copy has this sticker.
I'm also skeptical as to whether anyone has seen any creatures which remotely represent those in the pre-release images. Giant sand worms, huge dinosaur type things etc. All I've seen are deformed gazelles.
Or you know, he could have said no. There is no multiplayer component whatsoever.I still don't see how those statements indicate that it would be a multiplayer game. Yes, he says it might be possible to see other players, but every single time he keeps saying that the chances of it is extremely small, which indicates to me a high unlikelihood any player would ever see another person.
So I still don't understand why any person would have bought this game for some nebulous multiplayer component that they clearly downplayed every time it was brought up.
Actually, yes they do.Sony doesn't decide what the PEGI rates the game for. The rating on the PEGI site doesn't list online functionality either:
![]()
I still don't see how those statements indicate that it would be a multiplayer game. Yes, he says it might be possible to see other players, but every single time he keeps saying that the chances of it is extremely small, which indicates to me a high unlikelihood any player would ever see another person.
So I still don't understand why any person would have bought this game for some nebulous multiplayer component that they clearly downplayed every time it was brought up.
Oh look, a bunch of people making something out of nothing.
Oh look, a bunch of people making something out of nothing.
Surely in a world so large is it really that unusual that nobody's found certain species yet, when the game was only released a couple of days ago? Genuine question as I haven't been following the development of this game for very long.
but how much chaff should one have to sift through before finding any wheat? seems to be the problem of this game; lots of bullshit to wade through for the (very slim if next to impossible?) chance of finding something interesting.Surely in a world so large is it really that unusual that nobody's found certain species yet, when the game was only released a couple of days ago? Genuine question as I haven't been following the development of this game for very long.
It's not nothing though is it, it's a fairly unique situation for any game to be in, and worthy of discussion, I guess it's a bit of a shame the game in question is NMS though.
Different icons that convey different levels of online play, is what I have been told.
But...people have "met" each other. They were on the same planet at the same time. And...nothing.I still don't see how those statements indicate that it would be a multiplayer game. Yes, he says it might be possible to see other players, but every single time he keeps saying that the chances of it is extremely small, which indicates to me a high unlikelihood any player would ever see another person.
So I still don't understand why any person would have bought this game for some nebulous multiplayer component that they clearly downplayed every time it was brought up.
There have been evidence that the game does not send player location and movement data to the servers whatsoever.
Actually yes, it is nothing. At least the sticker bit.
You've been told wrong.
Oh look, a bunch of people making something out of nothing.
Every planet has species. (I am pretty sure) So people have seen probably millions of species by now. And not one of them looks that different to each other in terms of size, or form. I'd say the chance of there being Sandworms + huge dinosaurs is close to 0. And they'd be idiotic to make such cool variations so rare practically no one sees them.
But...people have "met" each other. They were on the same planet at the same time. And...nothing.
Was that meant as a reply to my post? Nothing in my post said the game has multiplayer...
How would multiplayer even be a secret to unlock? What benefit would it add?And one guy was on NAT3 while the other was not. I still don't find this compelling evidence to make a final judgement on.
Although the lack of a real answer from Hello Games is interesting. Either they are dancing around the subject, or maybe multiplayer is a secret to be unlocked in the game. Or any other possibility.
How would multiplayer even be a secret to unlock? What benefit would it add?
"Will you be able to play with your friends?" "Yes!"
And one guy was on NAT3 while the other was not. I still don't find this compelling evidence to make a final judgement on.
Although the lack of a real answer from Hello Games is interesting. Either they are dancing around the subject, or maybe multiplayer is a secret to be unlocked in the game. Or any other possibility.
Can you explain why it's nothing?, I asked the question earlier does this kind of thing happen often, and the answer was no, so surely something that doesn't happen often isn't nothing?
There is probably a very simple explanation, but you can't fault people for bringing something that doesn't happen very often up for discussion?
I see. Alright. Then why cover the icon up? Seems very weird to do so if there was never any need.
The sole fact that the sticker repointed PEGI 12 to PEGI 7 is an interesting bit of game development's inner secrets. I doubt anyone will care, but I wonder whether it was really a fault of HG's description of the thing, or was it a case of some sort of minor feature changes, not necessarily involving multiplayer.
Nope, no secrets. It's just a conversation between PEGI and Sony regarding the contents of the game. They decided against a 12 in the end, and Sony managed to convince them down to a 7. This takes fairly little effort in my experience, but Sony could get fined if anyone takes offense.
I've seen velociraptors.
Not the same as a diplodocus but still cool.
How would multiplayer even be a secret to unlock? What benefit would it add?
To go from that to not even being able to see anyone else at all...what happened?
I'm sure there are quite a few planets that hasn't been explored yet though...The thing that doesn't seem to be possible is specifically the size. Huge creature sightings are at 0, yes? (despite advertisement showcasing them prominently)
And one guy was on NAT3 while the other was not. I still don't find this compelling evidence to make a final judgement on.
Thanks for the explanation.
I can understand the marketing reasons for bringing the rating down from 12 to 7, but I wonder what technicalities or omissions they had to make to the game to be able to do it, or is it just simply a case of reducing the rating without actually changing anything?
Development, I'd imagine. I don't think Hello Games are liars, I think that this game's hype spiraled far out of their control and they did not get out ahead of the release and clarify older statements fast enough.
I speculate that they either forgot they had even said this stuff to the press (quite likely, given how hectic the development of this game must have been with such a small team handling everything), or they were terrified of pre-release backlash if they "canceled" multiplayer and just sort of... never said anything.
I'm sure there are quite a few planets that hasn't been explored yet though...
The thing that doesn't seem to be possible is specifically the size. Huge creature sightings are at 0, yes? (despite advertisement showcasing them prominently)
The 12 age rating is for mild violence against human-like and animal creatures.
The 3 age rating is for violence against fantasy creatures or cartoon characters.
Given the fact that all of NMS' creatures are fully fantasy creatures, a 3 age rating would have sufficed. However, the game contains content that may be frightening to young children, so they bumped it to 7, which is what that age rating is for.
The initial 12 was most likely due to the alien creatures being categorised as creatures that could be recognised as animals. They probably countered that by saying that none of the creatures exist in real life, making it fully fantasy = 3 age rating.
Making changes to appease ratings is nothing new, and happens all the time. In this case though, I think no changes had to be made.
I still don't see how those statements indicate that it would be a multiplayer game. Yes, he says it might be possible to see other players, but every single time he keeps saying that the chances of it is extremely small, which indicates to me a high unlikelihood any player would ever see another person.
So I still don't understand why any person would have bought this game for some nebulous multiplayer component that they clearly downplayed every time it was brought up.
Follow Earth's species evolution.
How many huge animals there are and how many mid/small sized?
Now think about the gazillion planets there are in the game.
Thanks for that, if nothing else, I've learnt something new today!
how about deformed huge dinosaur type things
![]()