|
formerly cjelly
(01-30-2013, 09:56 PM)
|
EA on Wii U: "What we describe as "Gen 4" is yet to come." [Up: Full Direct Quote]
#1
From their investor q and a.
Thanks to iMax. http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost...1&postcount=54
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by CrunchinJelly; 01-30-2013 at 10:55 PM.
|
|
|
|
Member
(01-30-2013, 10:01 PM)
|
#29
Doesn't have to make sense. I think we know what they mean.
Is there any truth to the Nintendo + Origin negotiations goin sour? |
|
Banned
(01-30-2013, 10:01 PM)
|
#32
|
|
Member
(01-30-2013, 10:01 PM)
|
#35
|
|
Member
(01-30-2013, 10:01 PM)
|
#36
That would involve them getting off their lazy asses. In stead they'll just make more Nintendo is doomed articles. Why not ask EA about how they were on stage with Nintendo last E3. It's strange stuff.
|
|
demodded, not denutted
(01-30-2013, 10:01 PM)
|
#39
Before the craziness and accusations begin, I am pretty sure the way they're describing gens is different from the traditional definition of 'whatever the newest iteration of a console' is.
I think he means the distinction as the differences in a generation where you have to build new engines and such... with Wii U, you can pretty much port your PS30 engines with modifications and be done with it. To get the most out of Orbis/Durango, you're going to have to build from scratch. For a game company, the distinction would be very real and a total different ballpark in terms of investment. |
|
Member
(01-30-2013, 10:02 PM)
|
#43
And any journalist worth their salt would continue to press and not be a lacky though I digress. Gaming Journalism is more about getting freebies than being a journalist
|
|
Banned
(01-30-2013, 10:03 PM)
|
#50
You really think that's what it is? EA would reserve the right to not comment, or give non-answers. Blaming the press is misguided.
|