• Register
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • @NeoGAF
  • Like
View Poll Results: Should TV manufacturers make a filter that adds chromatic aberration to your TV?
Yes, and on by default
115 37.58%
Yes, and not disableable
191 62.42%
Voters: 306. You may not vote on this poll


Lifeline
Member
(10-07-2017, 12:29 AM)
Lifeline's Avatar
Noticed this as soon as I got my TV years ago, and wondered if that's how old people still watch TV. Suprised it's still kept on by default.
Pai Pai Master
Banned
(10-07-2017, 12:29 AM)
Pai Pai Master's Avatar
Fuck yeah. Motion smoothing is the worst thing ever.
michaelius
Member
(10-07-2017, 12:30 AM)
michaelius's Avatar
Start filming them in high fps mode then. Hobbit 48fps was amazing experience.
old manatee
Banned
(10-07-2017, 12:31 AM)
old manatee's Avatar
My dad's friend had this turned on and we watched all of of Goodfellas that way. It looked like a cheap soap opera. I was laughing my a o.
Johnny Cage In The Shower
Member
(10-07-2017, 12:31 AM)
Johnny Cage In The Shower's Avatar
Hey man! It works great for video gaming on your TV. I get it that it shouldn't be set up as default. But it got me through lots of Pc gaming goodness, maling it seem like some games were a lot smoother in frame rate than they actually were.
Peltz
Member
(10-07-2017, 12:32 AM)
Peltz's Avatar
God speed. Motion smoothing is an abomination
Manny Calavera
Member
(10-07-2017, 12:32 AM)
Manny Calavera's Avatar

Originally Posted by Fancy Clown

The fact that itís hidden deep in menus and called something different on every TV AND is on by default is the biggest bullshit. Yeah Iím totally gonna drop a few thousand on a TV because I want to make everything look like it was filmed in some British dudeís basement in 1973.

This sums it up. Always the first feature I disable.
ShadowKingpin
Member
(10-07-2017, 12:33 AM)
ShadowKingpin's Avatar
YES. Get rid of that shit!
Sinfamy
Member
(10-07-2017, 12:34 AM)
Sinfamy's Avatar
Everytime I went to a friend's house to watch Game of Thrones I hated it his Vizio TV had this shit cranked to the max, ruins everything.
ClosingADoor
Member
(10-07-2017, 12:36 AM)
ClosingADoor's Avatar
TVs should display the images and done. No bullshit processing or smoothing or whatever. It is never better.
RandomHopeInc
Member
(10-07-2017, 12:39 AM)
RandomHopeInc's Avatar
I hate that effect so much, who asked to be hyper aware of the camera while watching movies? NO ONE
UpperCaseN
Member
(10-07-2017, 12:39 AM)
UpperCaseN's Avatar
Every input on my TV is set to PC mode. I have zero PC's connected to my TV
majik13
Member
(10-07-2017, 12:40 AM)
majik13's Avatar
Bout time, tired of searching for it and turning it off every time I go to someones house.
Giolon
Member
(10-07-2017, 12:41 AM)
Giolon's Avatar
My mom got a new 4K 65" X930D Sony TV at the beginning of the year, and with motion smoothing entirely turned off, jerkiness was distractingly bad. Fortunately, it has custom adjustments, so I enabled it with the minimum amount of smoothing, and it addresses the 90% motion jerkiness without making motion look soap opera fake and overly smooth. So, I think that there are improvements that have been made in the tech that don't have to make everything look like butt. My ~4 year old Sony W900a looks terrible with it turned on, so I keep it off.

I hate when I walk into a bar or a restaurant and they've got their TVs with motion interpolation set to maximum soap opera. I just want to take their remote and fix it.
Paragon
Member
(10-07-2017, 12:42 AM)
Paragon's Avatar

Originally Posted by matthewuk

One of the problems with LCD displays is that motion effectively reduce the resolution to 300p. So yep 1080p in stills or slow panning. But as soon as the action get heated the details fly out of the window.

That's caused by displays being flicker-free, not because they are LCDs. OLEDs have exactly the same problem.
It's also much worse than that. Those motion tests they use - which are a test of slow panning motion, not fast motion - run at 60Hz.
On a flicker-free display, motion resolution is linked directly to framerate. So it's not dropping to "300 lines of motion resolution" with 24 FPS film - it's dropping to 120 lines.

Originally Posted by CreepingFear

I'm all for native HFR. That's not what this is. This is like colorization of black and white material. It's not not good looking.

Nope. Film looks like that natively. The problem is that pretty much no-one has been watching film natively at 24Hz for decades.
Interpolation is closer to an accurate representation of the source material than repeating frames.

Originally Posted by Fitts

Interpolation is gross. Sample-and-hold displays are insufficient for displaying full motion.
Y'all should've bought plasmas while you could. Too bad the early stigma stuck, FUD spread like wildfire, and the average consumer continually buys into half-baked gimmickry.

I'll take motion blur over PWM driving. Plasmas give me migraines due to the problems that they have in motion, like the image breaking up into separate colors. Black and white films in particular are unwatchable.
Warning: lots of flicker. This slow-motion video shows how they actually draw the image.
Note: the refresh rates listed there are wrong. 14 sub-fields per frame is 840Hz (not 1400Hz) and 28 sub-fields per frame is 1680Hz (not 2800Hz).
For good motion handling, refresh rate must be equal to the framerate.
NoMoreTrolls
Member
(10-07-2017, 12:44 AM)
NoMoreTrolls's Avatar
Good. It looks like shit.
Wandering Robot
Member
(10-07-2017, 12:48 AM)
Wandering Robot's Avatar
You know, I've always hated the look but just learned the name thanks to this thread. Fortunately my TV doesn't have it, but next time I visit a few certain family members, I'll do them a quick favor.
Z3M0G
Member
(10-07-2017, 12:48 AM)
Z3M0G's Avatar
The high frame rate would be nice for some things... but it is HORRIBLE for everything due to the damn artifacts. Sports probably doesnt suffer if people dont mind it... unless they are used to seeing players look like they came out of Ringu...

Kill. It. With. Fire.

At least HFR will never be a thing in cinemas again...?
RedToad64
Member
(10-07-2017, 12:49 AM)
RedToad64's Avatar
This was the first thing I turned off when I got a TV a few years ago. It has been an issue for awhile and I always roll my eyes at the sight of someone with it on.
poppabk
Member
(10-07-2017, 12:57 AM)
poppabk's Avatar
Aren't most movies on TV using 3:2 pulldown or something similar?
I'd rather fake fluid that jerky panning shots.
Fitts
Member
(10-07-2017, 12:59 AM)
Fitts's Avatar

Originally Posted by Paragon

I'll take motion blur over PWM driving. Plasmas give me migraines due to the problems that they have in motion, like the image breaking up into separate colors. Black and white films in particular are unwatchable.

Sorry that you fall into the minority and seem to have major issues with flickering. As someone who also suffers from migraines I totally get it. I left a job because they changed to different lighting that was a major trigger and have viewed some plasmas that have had a similar affect on me. However, not all PDPs were created equal and I've owned late model Pioneers/Panasonics for years without having issues.

Blur, however, continues to be a persistent issue with every LCD/OLED. And I'm a home theater installer so you name it, and I'm eyes-on with it on a regular basis.
Fuchsdh
Member
(10-07-2017, 01:00 AM)
Fuchsdh's Avatar

Originally Posted by backflip10019

Motion smoothing is fucking horrible.

My in-laws have never turned it off, so I have to watch it there every time I visit.

Feels like every holiday I'm adjusting people's TVs to turn it off.
AuthenticM
Member
(10-07-2017, 01:08 AM)
AuthenticM's Avatar
Now this is something I can get behind.
killdatninja
Banned
(10-07-2017, 01:11 AM)
killdatninja's Avatar
It's gotten better over the years but any of the "high" settings just look awful in the real world (not on TV specific engineered demo's). I don't know how the QA departments look at a TV with motion smoothing set to high and think to themselves "the motion on this looks amazing".
emag
Member
(10-07-2017, 01:14 AM)
Motion interpolation is one thing, but I'm not at all in agreement with the High Frame Rate haters.

I, for one, can't wait until directors get on board with 120 Hz film making.
SCHUEY F1
Member
(10-07-2017, 01:14 AM)
SCHUEY F1's Avatar
Always disappointed when I see my friends leaving it on
tokkun
Member
(10-07-2017, 01:21 AM)
tokkun's Avatar

Originally Posted by border

Is there a reason games don't use this to achieve at least the look of 60 FPS?

It adds a few frames worth of input lag.
BlastCore
Banned
(10-07-2017, 01:25 AM)
The fact that it's called something different by every tv manufacturer is bullshit. Y'all should do what I do and just turn off every post processing feature on a TV.
Ridley327
Member
(10-07-2017, 01:25 AM)
Ridley327's Avatar

Originally Posted by Z3M0G

The high frame rate would be nice for some things... but it is HORRIBLE for everything due to the damn artifacts. Sports probably doesnt suffer if people dont mind it... unless they are used to seeing players look like they came out of Ringu...

Kill. It. With. Fire.

At least HFR will never be a thing in cinemas again...?

The Avatar sequels are being shot at 48fps HFR, last we heard.
Orayn
Member
(10-07-2017, 01:26 AM)
Orayn's Avatar

Originally Posted by border

Is there a reason games don't use this to achieve at least the look of 60 FPS?

There's been discussion of games implementing this internally to achieve that effect with minimal input lag, but nobody's actually done it yet. It has some things in common with temporal reconstruction techniques used for AA, just with the added element of interpolating new frames instead of just smoothing out temporal artifacts in existing ones.
The Albatross
Member
(10-07-2017, 01:27 AM)
The Albatross's Avatar
I lost this argument for years at friends houses and just gave up.

"It looks more real"

Originally Posted by border

Is there a reason games don't use this to achieve at least the look of 60 FPS?

Input lag is the main reason which is really the opposite of what you want when trying to achieve 60fps responsiveness. Ends up working against your goal.
Paragon
Member
(10-07-2017, 01:59 AM)
Paragon's Avatar

Originally Posted by Fitts

Sorry that you fall into the minority and seem to have major issues with flickering. As someone who also suffers from migraines I totally get it. I left a job because they changed to different lighting that was a major trigger and have viewed some plasmas that have had a similar affect on me. However, not all PDPs were created equal and I've owned late model Pioneers/Panasonics for years without having issues.

Yeah, it sucks. I have issues with a lot of LED lighting too - especially cheap LED lighting, which tends to use PWM dimming.
It's not an issue with any specific model of plasma though - it's how they fundamentally draw an image that is the problem.
Even if the phosphors all had identical response times, which would solve the color breakup problem, they're still drawing the image using sub-frames instead of refreshing once per frame.

Originally Posted by Fitts

Blur, however, continues to be a persistent issue with every LCD/OLED. And I'm a home theater installer so you name it, and I'm eyes-on with it on a regular basis.

Several LCDs and even some OLEDs now have backlight scanning or BFI options which greatly reduces motion blur if it's refreshing at the same rate as the framerate.
The main problem arises when the refresh rate is higher than the source framerate, since you get clear double-images in place of the motion blur.
With film only being 24 FPS, and manufacturers refusing to strobe at a rate lower than 60Hz, the only solution is interpolation, or some combination of interpolation plus strobing.

Originally Posted by poppabk

Aren't most movies on TV using 3:2 pulldown or something similar?
I'd rather fake fluid that jerky panning shots.

3:2 pulldown means that they extract the original 24 FPS frames from a 60Hz source.
Five 1080i60 fields gives you two 1080p24 frames with 3:2 pulldown - or even 480i60 to 480p24 with DVDs in certain players.
This eliminates the judder caused by an uneven 3:2 cadence from fitting 24 frames into 60 refreshes, but does nothing for the jerky appearance of low framerate motion on a flicker-free display.

Originally Posted by Ridley327

The Avatar sequels are being shot at 48fps HFR, last we heard.

Filmmakers really need to drop the idea that there is something magical about the number 24.
If it was shot at 60 FPS, it could display in HFR on virtually every television ever produced. (at least in NTSC regions)
Almost nothing supports 48Hz inputs.

If they are going to pick a framerate that nothing currently supports, they should have gone with something like 120 FPS.
Push for something even higher than that and keep theaters one step ahead of consumer displays, even.

Originally Posted by The Albatross

I lost this argument for years at friends houses and just gave up.
"It looks more real"

They're not wrong.
24 FPS looks very unnatural the way that 99% of displays out there show it.
It's just that cinephiles somehow like that awful stuttering motion and the screen becoming a blur if anything moves.
MattKeil
BIGTIME TV MOGUL #2
(10-07-2017, 02:08 AM)
MattKeil's Avatar

Originally Posted by Skux

This is the unfortunate side effect of the soap operas of the 80s and 90s - anything that looks high frame rate or smooth has embedded the association of "cheap soap opera" into the general public, and this turned a lot of people off the technical aspects of The Hobbit.

People have this ingrained idea that it's only a "film" if it's 24fps. It "feels filmic" or "has that filmic look". And rightfully so - the 24fps standard has been around for decades and has been used for almost every movie they've watched.

But 24fps is only a number that was chosen because it was the tradeoff between motion fidelity and cost. It was good enough and cheap enough to be widely adopted. Unfortunately it's also terribly limiting in some cases, but attempting to go against the grain is often met with revulsion from film purists.

We need more big budget, high frame rate content, especially for action and sci-fi films where temporal fidelity is important. This will help change the perception and make it more acceptable to have high frame rate content for films that would benefit from it. Can you imagine Fast & Furious or Star Trek shot natively at 60fps. It would be a feast for the eyes.

It would look like garbage and it can fuck off. HFR does not do anything but make film look like low budget crap. 60fps is for videogames, not movies.

You HFR people will never win this fight, thankfully. Nobody can afford to triple their CG budgets.
Santiako
Member
(10-07-2017, 02:17 AM)
Santiako's Avatar
My parents bought a new massive 4k tv and when I went to visit they were watching a stretched SD channel with motion smoothing on. I wanted to gouge my eyes out with a rusty spoon.
Gravidee
Member
(10-07-2017, 02:19 AM)
Gravidee's Avatar
Totally on board with this. I always wonder why the hell it is turned on in every TV display that I see at a retailer.
Robot Pants
Member
(10-07-2017, 02:20 AM)
Robot Pants's Avatar
Normally Iíd be on board.
But my Sony 850c has smoothing settings and ďstandardĒ is pretty fantastic on my tv.
googleplex
Member
(10-07-2017, 02:21 AM)
googleplex's Avatar
I saw The Hobbit in 3D at 48FPS. Shit was amazing.
Johnny Cage In The Shower
Member
(10-07-2017, 02:21 AM)
Johnny Cage In The Shower's Avatar
If your're dumb enough to leave this "feature" on when you newly purchase TV home and leave it on while watching movies: Maybe you don't deserve to buy a new TV etc.

What I'm getting at is, it's a feature that should not go away. It should be there as an option. Because like I said, I think it works great for (most) gaming.
Englebert3rd
Member
(10-07-2017, 02:21 AM)
I always hated that Soap Opera effect. It was the first thing I turned off in my latest TV.
DMVfan123
Banned
(10-07-2017, 02:22 AM)
I've always wondered what this feature what but could never put my finger on it
The only place I've seen this feature is at supermarkets and at some of my family's friends' houses since it never came by default on any of the TVs I've owned
Aiustis
Member
(10-07-2017, 02:22 AM)
Aiustis's Avatar
So what is motion smoothing? What does it look like?
Death Metalist
Member
(10-07-2017, 02:23 AM)
Death Metalist's Avatar
about fucking time
katsubento
Member
(10-07-2017, 02:24 AM)
katsubento's Avatar
First thing I turn off when I get a new TV.
DOWN
Junior Member
(10-07-2017, 02:27 AM)
DOWN's Avatar
I mean, high frame rate video looks grossly similar. Hobbit in high frame rate was disgusting...
Jesus Carbomb
From Water into Guinness
(10-07-2017, 02:29 AM)
Jesus Carbomb's Avatar
Should only be left on by the manufacturer for their "Sports Mode" preset. For every other preset it should be turned off.
To Far Away Times
Member
(10-07-2017, 02:30 AM)
To Far Away Times's Avatar
Yup. I can't stand it.
jstripes
Banned
(10-07-2017, 02:31 AM)

Originally Posted by Gravidee

Totally on board with this. I always wonder why the hell it is turned on in every TV display that I see at a retailer.

Because it "looks cool" to the less discerning crowd.
Septimus Prime
Member
(10-07-2017, 02:37 AM)
Septimus Prime's Avatar
Listen, if you want chromatic aberration, buy a CRT and shake it. Then you will have this feature always on.
emag
Member
(10-07-2017, 02:40 AM)

Originally Posted by Aiustis

So what is motion smoothing? What does it look like?

More like real life instead of being a slide show. Unfortunately, we've been brainwashed to think that stuttery, stilted framerates are a mark of high quality photography.

To be fair, motion smoothing is artificially trying to achieve higher frame rates after the fact by frame doubling and adding interpolated frames (akin to anti-aliasing in the temporal direction).
Bobo Dakes
Member
(10-07-2017, 02:49 AM)
Bobo Dakes's Avatar
I'll notice this on other people's TVs when I'm at their house and ask them if they want me to turn it off and they'll ask me what I'm talking about.

Might be too late.

See it on all the 4K TVs whenever I go to Best Buy.

Shame.

Thread Tools